Theme: Education

  • COUNTER TO AD HOM @xevious2030 @All; Well, you know, the curriculum you speak of

    COUNTER TO AD HOM

    @xevious2030 @All;

    Well, you know, the curriculum you speak of is rather dim – a comparison of the of the top fifty schools will rapidly illustrate only MIT and Stanford have undergraduate programs of note, and Yale is even worse, with only the JD program exemplary – demonstrating yet again, that these schools merely filter, that filtering grants life advantage, but they teach nothing of consequence and much of what they teach is of inconsequence.

    The West Point Curriculum is little different with an emphasis on military bureaucracy, and combined arms, developed during the second world war, while today men in flip-flops with old AK’s, RPG’s and improvised explosives, when on home territory can defeat the worlds greatest military over and over again for decades for the simple reason that concentration of forces does little good against non-concentrated forces. We are 0-4 losers against the muslims, who never had the Westphalian peace, and do not confuse attrition warfare for their civilization with policing actions, nor do they want western (hedonism) liberalism of the individual over the intergenerational family.

    I learned morse code in a few days in grade school, programming in most languages in a week or two, read every set of encyclopedias i could get my hands on at least three times, had entrepreneurial family I could imitate, and I’ll happily debate the generations of warfare, the technical innovation in each (rather simple really), the military, political, economic, and tactical requirements of each, and the current failure of combined arms concentration of forces in post Westphalian conditions – and the irony of concrete walls as return to historical norm. And that’s before I can discuss intellectual, scientific, technological, economic, political, civilizational history. I studied the fine arts (Aesthetics) in college – I had no other requirements.

    Innovation is far harder than understanding, because understanding is required prior to innovation. One must master craft before one produces art. Hence why some folk study trades, some the clerical, some persuasive or communicative, some the technical, some the professional, some the economic, some the political, and some of us study the great game of economic, philosophy, and warfare.

    It’s why you lived the life of an obedient common man. It’s why I built a dozen companies of 5m to 100m, retired young, solved the long standing problems of performative truth, commensurability, the grammars, the logic of the social sciences, provided a solution to the nineteenth and twentieth centuries of semitic intellectual undermining of or people, completed the aristotelian project doing so, and have started a movement, with the sole purpose of restoring Natural European, Aristotelian (truth), Pagan(Hero-Dominance), Heathen(Nature), Christian (Love-Submission) Civilization – by the only remaining method: the organized threat of, and promise of violence. Meanwhile, those who *fail* to labor to produce the innovations that provide a solution to the problems of our age, double down on their dedication catastrophic failure, and congratulate themselves on their wisdom: inability, ignorance,failure – in the most heinous demonstration of arrogance in order to obscure lack of agency and the cowardice to face it.

    Christianity like a woman – whose cognition it seduces with false promise of release from the burden of a reality requiring physical action to alter – can love, can resist, and can undermine – but it cannot *innovate* as as the evidence of jewish failure, christian failure, and islamic failure illustrates when compared to Aristotelian(Scientific), Pagan and Heathen European, and Rational, Pagan and Heathen Chinese. Even so, the Chinese, insulated from the informational-cancer, and dysgenic reproduction, of semitic monotheism by geographic distance, desert, mountain, and seas, could not achieve in millennia, what europeans achieved in a few centuries in the IE expansion, a few centuries in the Mediterranean, and a few centuries in the Modern world: to drag mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the chaos of a nature all but hostile to the continuation of human life – complaining, whining, kicking, and screaming all the while – Just as you do today. Because aristotelian description(testimony), pagan debt to ancestors, heathen debt to nature are all *true* – meaning decidable independent of condition, ability, ignorance, or preference.

    So, learn something – and save yourselves, your people, your nation, your feminine religion, your civilization, and mankind, or wallow in your arrogant, overconfident, ignorant, cowardly lack of agency to function as other than the running with the herd.

    -Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 13:08:00 UTC

  • You are a useful idiot because you were intentionally NOT taught economics, fina

    You are a useful idiot because you were intentionally NOT taught economics, finance, basic law, or even basic engineering. So you can spew ignorant envious drivel without having any conception of the extreme privilege you live under because of our bias to entrepreneurial efforts.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 13:25:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192432851242901504

    Reply addressees: @studentactivism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192432328599056385


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @studentactivism The better question is, why don’t we give ALL our research and development money to the Billionaires to manage, and all our public institutions to these same people, because they are demonstrably, in every single case, in every single era beyond what government people (fail) do.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192432328599056385


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @studentactivism The better question is, why don’t we give ALL our research and development money to the Billionaires to manage, and all our public institutions to these same people, because they are demonstrably, in every single case, in every single era beyond what government people (fail) do.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192432328599056385

  • Not true: millions of people watch it, thousands read it, hundreds learn from it

    Not true: millions of people watch it, thousands read it, hundreds learn from it, dozens of compete with it, and a handful now teach it. So you are only a measure of your own ignorance and inability. I write for leaders – not pop theology, philosophy,therapy for the whining weak.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 17:47:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192136312809230338

    Reply addressees: @Slackhurst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192128150043578369


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Slackhurst

    @curtdoolittle Your writing is difficult to read because it’s unreadable.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192128150043578369

  • Got instructions from ‘the management’ to invest in Brandon, Luke and a few othe

    Got instructions from ‘the management’ to invest in Brandon, Luke and a few others I won’t name. Truth is Stepan is better online than I am, and Alain is close. And it’s thrilling, Brandon can be. … But I want to explain why I’m cautious with investments. And that’s because by trying to accelerates one’s journey we always and everywhere interfere and anchor that journey. And for intellectual excellence to emerge in any individual he must produce and OWN his journey. So it is only helpful to provide positive reinforcement, and to ‘advise’ on ‘near misses’. This means keeping an eye on something and investing in ‘expanding gupon’ any given insight they have. So one can ‘instruct a body of people in foundations. You can play king of the hill to teach afterward. But you can only give subtle assistance upon request if you want to make fellow ‘kings’. This method of teaching requires knowledge skill, and must only progress over time. And this is why I am increasingly hostile to our prussian industrialized education system – which is suitable only for girls and the underclasses, and not at all suitable for boys and men – who if anything must learn to compete in individually, in groups, and in tribes (armies) to care enough to invest in themselves, their families, their societies and their people.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 15:23:00 UTC

  • “It never gets easier, you just get better” is how I’d approach your work. Like

    —“It never gets easier, you just get better” is how I’d approach your work. Like learning a programming language. Generally it’s as much about learning the syntax/grammar as the principles.”—Todd E. Magnusson


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 08:24:00 UTC

  • We must balance the permissiveness with discipline, so that the boys engage in p

    We must balance the permissiveness with discipline, so that the boys engage in pranks but not crimes; so that as men they will be competitors in the market and fathers at home; and be soldiers in war, and citizens in the commons.

    Aristocracy: Cheer them on, but carry a stick. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 17:20:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191767341337632768

    Reply addressees: @freedomismoral

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191766058157215744


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191766058157215744

  • EDUCATION Academy-State-Media = Enemy Pseudo-Intellectual Dark Web = Frenemy Pet

    EDUCATION
    Academy-State-Media = Enemy
    Pseudo-Intellectual Dark Web = Frenemy
    Peterson = Therapy – Kindergarten
    Molyneux = Counsel – Grade School
    Hoppe = Agitator – High School
    Yarvin = Critic – Junior College
    Doolittle = Conquest – University
    War = Victory – Military
    (bait) 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 17:16:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191766256183054336

  • If you are checking out a university, the only useful means of doing so is to lo

    If you are checking out a university, the only useful means of doing so is to look at the bios and publications of the professors in the disciplines you will be studying. The rest is just how much status, what social economic class, and what creature comforts you want to pay for.

    If you want me to check out prof’s for you, then yes I’ll do that. It only takes a few minutes. But I don’t really recommend universities because they’re pretty much all infected.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 18:55:00 UTC

  • THE OTHER REASON FOR ACADEMIC REFORM: USE TECH TO SCALE THE BEST, AND EXIT THE R

    THE OTHER REASON FOR ACADEMIC REFORM: USE TECH TO SCALE THE BEST, AND EXIT THE REST.
    —“Most professors outside of the very top tier don’t break the 120 -130 range (not bright enough to move… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497562774173951&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 17:33:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190320859359174658

  • THE OTHER REASON FOR ACADEMIC REFORM: USE TECH TO SCALE THE BEST, AND EXIT THE R

    THE OTHER REASON FOR ACADEMIC REFORM: USE TECH TO SCALE THE BEST, AND EXIT THE REST.

    —“Most professors outside of the very top tier don’t break the 120 -130 range (not bright enough to move the dial). I was fortunate to have an outstanding Harvard educated law school professor, however, who was both intelligent (plus 3.83-4 standard deviations) and erudite. His course on contemporary legal theory alerted me to the enemy’s 20th c. techniques (Gramscian long march, Fabian infiltration, Frankfort cultural critique, feminism, post-modernism, and unrestrained legal positivism). Thank you Professor Durham.”—Scott De Warren


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 13:32:00 UTC