RT @jordanbpeterson: 40% of liberal professors deserve to be worried about being eaten by their own children.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 02:46:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630761435293798401
RT @jordanbpeterson: 40% of liberal professors deserve to be worried about being eaten by their own children.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 02:46:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630761435293798401
OBVIOUS: COLLEGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
Why? Did you go to College for education and training that made you work, or for entertainment and fulfillment that didn’t? https://twitter.com/knrd_z/status/1630435103636586496
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 02:36:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630758902768828418
Well, still/some is different from does/very much. You’re the person I respect most because you DO something, you’re not anti-intellectual, and you positively educate. Even better when I add value you appreciate it, and when I’m unconstructive you ignore it. Which is about…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 01:09:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630736915933659137
Reply addressees: @radiofreenw @MartianHoplite @TheAutistocrat @ajrwalker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630695293544202240
Well, still/some is different from does/very much. You’re the person I respect most because you DO something, you’re not anti-intellectual, and you positively educate. Even better when I add value you appreciate it, and when I’m unconstructive you ignore it. Which is about perfect in my world. 😉
I’ve been thinking.
I used to love these malcontents.
Their hostility made me lose that love. Fast.
Their continued hostility and anti-intellectualism made me sad and weighed on me. To the point where I considered stopping my work just so I didn’t deal with them.
And my limited participation in groups that are politically active, successful, and doing something constructive made me understand that there are good people out there, especially successful working, middle, and upper middle class men – but these young ‘online’ malcontents had no value, caused me to interact with their frustrating stupidity, childishness, and hostility, and poisoned the well for my work.
So it’s more that, for my own quality of life, I just want them to (shut up and) leave me alone so I can do my work with the good people who aren’t anti-intellectual, aren’t disagreeable, already get out and do something, and will not undermine everything they touch. Every single person with some leadership or knowledge is eventually dragged down by the overwhelming urge to satisfy the loud, rude mad boys, and find a false sense of confidence in clicks, attention, and grifting.
Now, association with SOME people allows me to use the good cop bad cop model, which is the most successful means of persuasion. And that model seems very effective. I can try to reach someone on their terms, but someone else will bound the discussion with limits, that prevent their terms from overstepping into justification.
So I guess what I”m saying is that I want to help everyone. Most of time the conservative position is correct. But most of the time conservatives are an obstacle to success.
In the end I think I”m probably emotionally exhausted between my health problems and the negativity. And if I don’t find a way to reduce that stress I”ll just choose to stop public participation entirely.
So that explains my behavior.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 01:09:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630736915753254914
Yes. Well, Scott’s primary area of focus is suggestion. And he uses hyperbole for the purpose of suggestion, just like authors, educators, priests, psychologists, and psychiatrists, use analogy as a means of suggestion. THE DIFFERENCE? Logical facility declines much faster than we assume, and (don’t get offended) but there is also a large difference in empathizing (feels first) vs systematizing (reals first) in the population. And that difference is the origin of our moral and political biases. So, you can’t use hyperbole with empathizers ’cause they literally can’t comprehend it. Conversely, conservatives use Hyperbole precisely because it illustrates the masculine kantian imperative and the western protestant ethic: “what if everyone did that?” THis is the cognitive opposite of the feminine NAXALT/AXALT cognitive bias, that seems unable to grasp a distribution, by defending outliers.
Humans are fascinating, but we intuit first and only softly and questionable reason second.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 17:14:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630617549938343945
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630616132422975497
I agree with school choice.
But it will require replacement of nearly the entire educational workforce with people who have demonstrated success in life experience, have no ideological illusions, operate purely empirically, and have sufficient training in cognitive behavioral therapy to fix the problem. It should take less than six generations.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 17:10:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630616496262070296
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630610922921246739
There is negative value in leveling the playing field. There are humans that require more discipline and less discipline before they can learn increasingly counter-intuitive concepts, because of our genetic differences,
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 17:09:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630616147623133193
Reply addressees: @lisamarcoux @JMeanypants @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630612510020714505
I agree. What I want tho is different from what is possible. My goal is to explain group differences truthfully and how to compensate for those differences by working at integration. That said, I would prefer my own people as many would. That can be solved by ending forced association and letting people do as they prefer.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 08:02:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630478473436307456
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630473318586363904
WHY EXPLANATION, EDUCATION, AND PERSUASION FAIL
Well, I don’t know where @Steve_Sailer stands on the issue, but the IQ problem is worse than we’d thought, because decline in logical ability increases rapidly and non-linearly, and human linguistic facility tends to mask how severe it is. There is almost no capacity to educate and explain anything of substance that is disagreeable to the audience and requires mutual sacrifice for the public good by the time we hit the low 90s and certainly the mid 80s.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 07:32:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630471048591208449
ACCUATION: “You consider yourself an educator?
You’re the worst kind of white suprematist.”
That I’m an educator? It’s just a demonstrable fact. I’m spending time and effort educating you and the audience right now.
That I’m a white supremacist? No, I’m not a white supremacist. I might be a classist (I am) because the problem of race conflict is largely a problem of class conflict, and race differences are largely a difference in the size of the lower and underclasses. So like most people I’m concerned about the behavior of the lower classes. (Genetic load tends to accumulate in the lower classes.)
I might say science is better than all the non-scientific alternatives. I might say ‘whiteness’ is the closest to behavioral science that’s possible by man. I might say ‘whiteness’ as a civilizational model is superior to all others currently known by man. I might be able to say why it is superior to all others known by man. And I might say that it’s very difficult to adopt without the significant effort of full integration.
But as for white people, the data is what it is. Genetically, the east Asians and the Ashkenazi have better statistics than we do. Biologically we are stronger than other races, but East Asians will live longer and Africans can endure more physical stress. So I’m not in favor of white superiority, or white supremacy. I’m in favor of whiteness because the science says ‘whiteness’ as civilizational order is the best man can achieve.
It’s just that whiteness is HARD. Because it requires trust and trustworthiness. And, you know, outside of Japanese, Koreans, and Europeans, that pretty much doesn’t happen in the world. Europeans practice truth before face, duty before self, and defense of the commons before all. It’s very hard to do that. That’s why Europe is a vast open-air museum and the rest of the world isn’t.
Cheers
Curt
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 07:04:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630463995734814725
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630456616519888896