Theme: Education

  • TEACHING ADVANCED CONCEPTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA? You *CAN* teach on social media. – I

    TEACHING ADVANCED CONCEPTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA?

    You *CAN* teach on social media.
    – It’s much harder on twitter than facebook. And that’s for one simple reason – the number of people on facebook vs twitter. My hope is that over the next two years as Twitter rebuilds it’s stack, and expands with new features, the combination of the cesspool that is FB’s management and personnel, vs the rise in twitter features, will cause more and more people to slowly migrate to the ‘everything app’ that musk envisions.

    Teaching on Social Media:
    1) Your audience will have different levels of understanding.
    2) Your audience will enter at different times, and progress at different rates.
    3) So you can’t control the learning process like a classroom. Instead you run it like a one-room schoolhouse with different students rotating in and out over time.
    4) So you develop a set of principles (themes) that you need to convey.
    … a) And then repeat core concepts regularly.
    … b) And use your concepts to explain current events constantly.
    … c) Then produce deep content tying everything to gether for the more developed audience.
    … d) And incrementally refine your presentation of the ideas as you go along.
    … e) And repeat a,b,c,d constantly and vary the depth based on the audience. For example, if you add a thousand new followers, then emphasize a,b, and if you’re noticing good comments and feedback, emphasize c,d.
    … f) Provide positive feedback for any progress, not just ‘getting it right or perfect’. And share the work of those who get it right or perfect.
    5) This ensures that people of different abilities who are interested enough to follow you, progress at their own rates.

    I teach content that’s really complicated: cross disciplinary in logic, language, cognitive science, behavioral economics, political economics, group evolutionary strategy, and the formal construction of algorithmic law from the first principles, and first principles of the natural law of cooperation.

    It’s about as hard to master as a STEM degree. It provides universal explanatory power for everything in the human experience. And for all intents and purposes, it’s free.

    You can do it on social media.
    But you can’t do it as we do in school and university.
    It’s more like a one room school house conducted as discourse and case studies in grad school.

    Cheers
    -Curt Doolittle.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 20:41:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633568594280710145

  • AI: ENDING THE VALUE OF GUT COURSE DEGREES? (Learn to code, and the gig economy

    AI: ENDING THE VALUE OF GUT COURSE DEGREES?
    (Learn to code, and the gig economy might be dead?)
    @KristinBTate provides a drama-free, realistic explanation of the threat of AI to white-collar “laptop workers” as great as the threat of industrialization to farm workers, robotics to… https://twitter.com/KristinBTate/status/1633503782662283266


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 18:54:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633541667763413001

  • I’m in the “If you can’t program you don’t know how to think yet”. Partly becaus

    I’m in the “If you can’t program you don’t know how to think yet”. Partly because programming is a novel mode of thought for man, and that’s because it’s intolerant of insufficiency causing ambiguity.

    By and large if you understand:
    Object-oriented programming (simulations).
    The hierarchy of ternary first principles of the universe,
    Truth, Reciprocity, and Demonstrated Interest
    And write in complete sentences, in operational prose, then you can describe any behavior of man, men, etc.

    That’s largely what P-Law consists of.
    And the P-Method consists of how to produce types, classes, properties, and methods.

    Algorithmic law.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 00:33:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633264756604665856

  • I’m in the “If you can’t program you don’t know how to think yet”. Partly becaus

    I’m in the “If you can’t program you don’t know how to think yet”. Partly because programming is a novel mode of thought for man, and that’s because it’s intolerant of insufficiency causing ambiguity.

    By and large if you understand:
    Object-oriented programming (simulations).
    The hierarchy of ternary first principles of the universe,
    Truth, Reciprocity, and Demonstrated Interest
    And write in complete sentences, in operational prose, then you can describe any behavior of man, men, etc.

    That’s largely what P-Law consists of.
    And the P-Method consists of how to produce types, classes, properties, and methods.

    Algorithmic law.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 00:33:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633264756692852739

  • Of course it is. It’s as difficult as any other four year STEM course and maybe

    Of course it is. It’s as difficult as any other four year STEM course and maybe more so. Certainly as difficult as law school.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 05:04:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632970547960115202

    Reply addressees: @Freedomcallblo1 @PNACstreetgang @FenianWiseguy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632969802116472835

  • lol…. The map is a history that reflects the density of literacy and record ke

    lol…. The map is a history that reflects the density of literacy and record keeping. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 03:11:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632941922699431936

    Reply addressees: @Dosadian @chedetofficial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632711077933854720

  • It’s OK. It’s adult conversation. It requires cross disciplinary knowledge of th

    It’s OK. It’s adult conversation. It requires cross disciplinary knowledge of the sciences. Go ahead and Switch back to porn and youtube. You’ll be fine.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 21:26:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632855313245143041

    Reply addressees: @factsimile1 @ScottAdamsSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632820136682962944

  • OMG – “College Students” Lot of these videos circulating. I remember feeling bad

    OMG – “College Students”
    Lot of these videos circulating. I remember feeling bad in poli sci when I couldn’t name but three of the sitting supreme court justices.
    This is why europeans, justifiably, think americans are ignorant… because they are. How on https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6htcNvxnVfg…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 14:48:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632755132445204482

  • Great question. Though one that’s difficult to answer, simply because science is

    Great question. Though one that’s difficult to answer, simply because science is so specialized, and there are nearly a hundred solid journals, and countless other niche publications.
    But, for the general audience the Nature family of publication is most respected and most likely to report something interesting.
    They have an eamil list that you can join that will send you a weekly list of what’s been published, and some responses (letters) to those articles.
    FWIW: I set up google alerts for science topics I’m interested in, and follow a number of people who ‘filter’ the lesser quality research for the few worthy (there are only a few really) bits that are useful.
    FWIW2: You would be surprised that it’s reasonably possible to stay current in most of the sciences simply because while a lot is published, very little provides novel insight. And also, there are not as many open questions about the universe as you’d imagine. It’s that those open questions are very hard to research.

    Reply addressees: @GracianoGreen @VelenskiMeir @Stoic_Media @PeterZeihan @EconomicsEx


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 21:27:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632493084930916352

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632471269009489922

  • Great question. Though one that’s difficult to answer, simply because science is

    Great question. Though one that’s difficult to answer, simply because science is so specialized, and there are nearly a hundred solid journals, and countless other niche publications.
    But, for the general audience the Nature family of publication is most respected and most likely to report something interesting.
    They have an eamil list that you can join that will send you a weekly list of what’s been published, and some responses (letters) to those articles.
    FWIW: I set up google alerts for science topics I’m interested in, and follow a number of people who ‘filter’ the lesser quality research for the few worthy (there are only a few really) bits that are useful.
    FWIW2: You would be surprised that it’s reasonably possible to stay current in most of the sciences simply because while a lot is published, very little provides novel insight. And also, there are not as many open questions about the universe as you’d imagine. It’s that those open questions are very hard to research.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 21:27:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632493085115465730

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632471269009489922