DECIDABILITY FOR NEWBS
“Decidability in logic or mathematics means that the information to distinguish between 3 and 4 for example, requires no additional information for comparison. Whereas choice and preference require information external to the argument.
I use ‘decidability’ and ‘truth’ very precisely.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-04 11:22:00 UTC
The Left hate decidability.
God is just another means of it.
Truth is just another means of it.
Law is just another means of it.
They want the world to be run by gossip not law.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-03 10:10:00 UTC
—“Is Truth then Relative or Absolute?”—Ken Cavallon
It’s a false dichotomy. We use the term TRUE for “agreement on correspondence”,
|TRUTH CLAIM| Undecidable > Possible > Relative > Consensual > Contingent > Probable > Decidable > Necessary > Analytic > Tautological.
As far as I know, all statements remain contingent, if only for the imprecision of definitions alone.
I’ll deflate it further into TESIMONY, DEMAND, and WARRANTY.
TESTIMONY: demand for agreement(x), degree of necessity(y) and degree of warranty(z).
DEMAND: I can hold an agreement on correspondence with myself, with someone else, with others, with everyone, with anyone.
WARRANTY: I can warranty my testimony corresponds to the possible, probable, contingent, decidable, necessary, analytic, and tautological.
And agreement can be possible, personally actionable, collectively actionable, collectively decidable, and collectively irrefutable, and collectively tautological.
We use ‘Truth’ for all those purposes: “true enough for the circumstance.”
The question is whether one uses the truth that is sufficient for the circumstances.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 07:17:00 UTC
The only decidable good is demonstrated voluntary reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-29 13:01:00 UTC