Curt Doolittle

Theme: Decidability

  • The Reciprocity Of Measurement (Infinities)

    Operationally defined, no infinite sets can exist, and the idea of infinite sets of different sizes is also impossible. However, what is possible, is that in the generation of positional names, some sets of names must be produced faster and some slower, so that at any given moment the size of the sets will differ. A number is the name of a position. A position can be applied to any dimension, and any number of dimensions. We can create mathematics using triangulation (the greek model) beginning with sizes, and using ratios of sizes, or we can create mathematics of positions and apply them to lengths in any dimension. This property defines the reciprocity of measurement. So we can start with the mathematics of triangulation, then apply it to scale (just as we apply money to prices as a standard unit), and then we can scale the unit reciprocally. If we taught mathematics operationally then all this fictionalism that makes math nonsense to so many people would disappear. So for example, we can measure art by triangulation but we cannot measure it by numbers. We can measure distances by either triangulation or numbers. There are phenomenon we cannot measure by numbers other than probability (causal density is too high).

  • THE RECIPROCITY OF MEASUREMENT (INFINITIES) Operationally defined, no infinite s

    THE RECIPROCITY OF MEASUREMENT (INFINITIES)

    Operationally defined, no infinite sets can exist, and the idea of infinite sets of different sizes is also impossible. However, what is possible, is that in the generation of positional names, some sets of names must be produced faster and some slower, so that at any given moment the size of the sets will differ. A number is the name of a position. A position can be applied to any dimension, and any number of dimensions. We can create mathematics using triangulation (the greek model) beginning with sizes, and using ratios of sizes, or we can create mathematics of positions and apply them to lengths in any dimension. This property defines the reciprocity of measurement. So we can start with the mathematics of triangulation, then apply it to scale (just as we apply money to prices as a standard unit), and then we can scale the unit reciprocally.

    If we taught mathematics operationally then all this fictionalism that makes math nonsense to so many people would disappear.

    So for example, we can measure art by triangulation but we cannot measure it by numbers. We can measure distances by either triangulation or numbers. There are phenomenon we cannot measure by numbers other than probability (causal density is too high).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-21 11:42:00 UTC

  • Overloading Works. Period.

    —“I know of people who DO know what [Marxian] dialectics means. They have elaborated a dialectical method in the form of an “algorithmic heuristic”, based upon an axiomatized ‘mathematics of dialectics’, which is both a ‘contra-Boolean algebra’ of dialectical logic, and a “non-standard model” of “Natural” Numbers arithmetic.”— Miguel Deton It’s called ‘Pilpul’. (Look it up) Like Numerology, Astrology, Scriptural Interpretation, Legal Interpretation, Marxism-Freudianism-Boazian Pseudoscience, and Postmodernisms, Meaning, the use of overloading to find excuses for any given status quo. Or we have another word for it: “The struggle to produce Fictionalisms”. As marx himself said, (I paraphrase) “If I am wrong, I can blame it on dialectic.” In other words, he was, like freud, boaz, and the entire frankfurt school, a fabricator (fictionalist). A desirable fiction. But a fiction none the less. Those lacking agency desire to create narrative falsehoods that give them the presumption of hope. It’s a mere psychological device. A form of mindfulness that humans have evolved in order to comfort themselves for having been born a failed experiment in evolution’s randomness.

  • WORKS. PERIOD. —“I know of people who DO know what [Marxian] dialectics means.

    http://www.dialectics.org/OVERLOADING WORKS. PERIOD.

    —“I know of people who DO know what [Marxian] dialectics means. They have elaborated a dialectical method in the form of an “algorithmic heuristic”, based upon an axiomatized ‘mathematics of dialectics’, which is both a ‘contra-Boolean algebra’ of dialectical logic, and a “non-standard model” of “Natural” Numbers arithmetic.”— Miguel Deton

    It’s called ‘Pilpul’. (Look it up) Like Numerology, Astrology, Scriptural Interpretation, Legal Interpretation, Marxism-Freudianism-Boazian Pseudoscience, and Postmodernisms, Meaning, the use of overloading to find excuses for any given status quo. Or we have another word for it: “The struggle to produce Fictionalisms”.

    As marx himself said, (I paraphrase) “If I am wrong, I can blame it on dialectic.” In other words, he was, like freud, boaz, and the entire frankfurt school, a fabricator (fictionalist). A desirable fiction. But a fiction none the less.

    Those lacking agency desire to create narrative falsehoods that give them the presumption of hope. It’s a mere psychological device. A form of mindfulness that humans have evolved in order to comfort themselves for having been born a failed experiment in evolution’s randomness.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 20:42:00 UTC

  • Overloading Works. Period.

    —“I know of people who DO know what [Marxian] dialectics means. They have elaborated a dialectical method in the form of an “algorithmic heuristic”, based upon an axiomatized ‘mathematics of dialectics’, which is both a ‘contra-Boolean algebra’ of dialectical logic, and a “non-standard model” of “Natural” Numbers arithmetic.”— Miguel Deton It’s called ‘Pilpul’. (Look it up) Like Numerology, Astrology, Scriptural Interpretation, Legal Interpretation, Marxism-Freudianism-Boazian Pseudoscience, and Postmodernisms, Meaning, the use of overloading to find excuses for any given status quo. Or we have another word for it: “The struggle to produce Fictionalisms”. As marx himself said, (I paraphrase) “If I am wrong, I can blame it on dialectic.” In other words, he was, like freud, boaz, and the entire frankfurt school, a fabricator (fictionalist). A desirable fiction. But a fiction none the less. Those lacking agency desire to create narrative falsehoods that give them the presumption of hope. It’s a mere psychological device. A form of mindfulness that humans have evolved in order to comfort themselves for having been born a failed experiment in evolution’s randomness.

  • Very Few People Pursue Truth. Most Want “True Enough”

    VERY FEW PEOPLE PURSUE TRUTH. MOST WANT “TRUE ENOUGH” The number of people whose primary concern is the discovery of perfect decidability (meaning Truth), and perfect decidability in physical, personal, interpersonal, political, and inter-political matters is very small. What all but a few want is not truth but justification, technique, or opportunity. The value of decidability (truth) to that near complete majority is in denying the opposition arguments, and modifying their justifications so that they are less impossible. But we will never change the human desire to discover a justificationary philosophy that grants them internal license to free ride or steal, in one way or another. Because all we are doing is seeking a means of expressing our evolutionary strategies.

  • VERY FEW PEOPLE PURSUE TRUTH. MOST WANT “TRUE ENOUGH” The number of people whose

    VERY FEW PEOPLE PURSUE TRUTH. MOST WANT “TRUE ENOUGH”

    The number of people whose primary concern is the discovery of perfect decidability (meaning Truth), and perfect decidability in physical, personal, interpersonal, political, and inter-political matters is very small. What all but a few want is not truth but justification, technique, or opportunity. The value of decidability (truth) to that near complete majority is in denying the opposition arguments, and modifying their justifications so that they are less impossible. But we will never change the human desire to discover a justificationary philosophy that grants them internal license to free ride or steal, in one way or another. Because all we are doing is seeking a means of expressing our evolutionary strategies.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 15:02:00 UTC

  • Very Few People Pursue Truth. Most Want “True Enough”

    VERY FEW PEOPLE PURSUE TRUTH. MOST WANT “TRUE ENOUGH” The number of people whose primary concern is the discovery of perfect decidability (meaning Truth), and perfect decidability in physical, personal, interpersonal, political, and inter-political matters is very small. What all but a few want is not truth but justification, technique, or opportunity. The value of decidability (truth) to that near complete majority is in denying the opposition arguments, and modifying their justifications so that they are less impossible. But we will never change the human desire to discover a justificationary philosophy that grants them internal license to free ride or steal, in one way or another. Because all we are doing is seeking a means of expressing our evolutionary strategies.

  • Philosophy Vs Science

    Ideal vs Real Proof vs Survival Type vs Spectrum Truth vs Decidability Right/Wrong vs Exchange/Theft Good/Bad vs Productive/Unproductive.

  • PHILOSOPHY VS SCIENCE Ideal vs Real Proof vs Survival Type vs Spectrum Truth vs

    PHILOSOPHY VS SCIENCE

    Ideal vs Real

    Proof vs Survival

    Type vs Spectrum

    Truth vs Decidability

    Right/Wrong vs Exchange/Theft

    Good/Bad vs Productive/Unproductive.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 14:50:00 UTC