—“The (((leftist))) response to Western truth telling is to insist that literally no knowledge can be known at all. It is only from this subjective reality that their mental poison can take root.”— Joseph Smith Just as females sew doubt and undermine any change in direction that includes any risk, and promises anything other than an immediate effortless windfall that requires no trust between parties.
Theme: Deception
-
Mass Media and The Explosion of Sophism
––“Invention of mass media led to explosion of sophism. Add in social media so you can see what everybody is thinking, and it becomes clear – most people are just operating on instinct. Even most right-wingers. (What Haidt points out is readily observable. People cherry-pick data according to the narrative their instinct causes them to embrace.) It just so happens that the right-wing instinct builds civilization and the left instinct destroys it. Point is, this modern explosion of sophism (leftists overloading the discourse via mass media) hasn’t actually changed the underlying dynamic, which is the same as in the previous battles between the two instincts.”— —John Mark
-
Mass Media and The Explosion of Sophism
––“Invention of mass media led to explosion of sophism. Add in social media so you can see what everybody is thinking, and it becomes clear – most people are just operating on instinct. Even most right-wingers. (What Haidt points out is readily observable. People cherry-pick data according to the narrative their instinct causes them to embrace.) It just so happens that the right-wing instinct builds civilization and the left instinct destroys it. Point is, this modern explosion of sophism (leftists overloading the discourse via mass media) hasn’t actually changed the underlying dynamic, which is the same as in the previous battles between the two instincts.”— —John Mark
-
No More Lies.
NO MORE LIES: 1) SCIENCE = LAW, 2) PHILOSOPHY = SOPHISM, 3) THEOLOGY = FICTIONALISM Science consists of performing due diligence such that we can warranty our testimony in operational terms each of which is testable by the audience (jury). In other words, science (which emerged out of western customary law) In science we attempt to falsify until only truth existentially possible candidates remain. Philosophy as the term is used, and as the consists of justificationism. It is an attempt to bridge the legal(scientific), and Imaginary (fictional). Just as theology is an attempt to exit the legal(scientific). In other words, both philosophy and theology seek to circumvent the demand for testimony. Law/Science (falsification) > Philosophy (justification) > Theology justificationary fictionalism). In other words, you either practice law or your practice sophism (fraud) or you practice fictionalism (lying). The question is, if you can’t state your testimony in legal (scientific) language, then you either don’t know what you’re talking about or your lying for one reason or another, because you CAN’T DO OTHERWISE.
-
No More Lies.
NO MORE LIES: 1) SCIENCE = LAW, 2) PHILOSOPHY = SOPHISM, 3) THEOLOGY = FICTIONALISM Science consists of performing due diligence such that we can warranty our testimony in operational terms each of which is testable by the audience (jury). In other words, science (which emerged out of western customary law) In science we attempt to falsify until only truth existentially possible candidates remain. Philosophy as the term is used, and as the consists of justificationism. It is an attempt to bridge the legal(scientific), and Imaginary (fictional). Just as theology is an attempt to exit the legal(scientific). In other words, both philosophy and theology seek to circumvent the demand for testimony. Law/Science (falsification) > Philosophy (justification) > Theology justificationary fictionalism). In other words, you either practice law or your practice sophism (fraud) or you practice fictionalism (lying). The question is, if you can’t state your testimony in legal (scientific) language, then you either don’t know what you’re talking about or your lying for one reason or another, because you CAN’T DO OTHERWISE.
-
Babylonian Origins
The resurrection was added much later and copied from a babylonian source. There are no records of testimony from the period, nor records of his existence. We know the origin of the three days narrative, and we know the origin of the rising from the dead narrative. These were added later by other authors. Saul (Paul) made up most of it, from what was possibly a real person who was rebelling against the use of the temple to raise more money – the roman occupation and the introduction of roman gods meant that temple revenues had decreased rapidly, so the priests were ‘drumming up new business’ and it seems likely some zealot rebelled and was imprisoned and killed for it. But there are no ‘testimonies’ and every pretense of testimony we have appears to be a fabrication.
-
Babylonian Origins
The resurrection was added much later and copied from a babylonian source. There are no records of testimony from the period, nor records of his existence. We know the origin of the three days narrative, and we know the origin of the rising from the dead narrative. These were added later by other authors. Saul (Paul) made up most of it, from what was possibly a real person who was rebelling against the use of the temple to raise more money – the roman occupation and the introduction of roman gods meant that temple revenues had decreased rapidly, so the priests were ‘drumming up new business’ and it seems likely some zealot rebelled and was imprisoned and killed for it. But there are no ‘testimonies’ and every pretense of testimony we have appears to be a fabrication.
-
The Purpose of Sophism Is Overloading
The purpose of a Sophism is to overload your reason such that you must appeal to intuition for decidability. And intuition is even more negatively biased than our cognitive biases.
-
The Purpose of Sophism Is Overloading
The purpose of a Sophism is to overload your reason such that you must appeal to intuition for decidability. And intuition is even more negatively biased than our cognitive biases.
-
no, the middle class rate of reproduction is being hindered by tax burden justif
no, the middle class rate of reproduction is being hindered by tax burden justified by postmodern deception
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 21:23:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035639283095400450
Reply addressees: @Qbeck01
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035597008042708992
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035597008042708992