—“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.”—
Theme: Deception
-
“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requi
-
“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requi
—“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.”—
-
How Desperately Addicts Seek to Preserve their Lies.
I engage in science and law, [You] conflate philosophizing (reasoning independent of falsification) with science (reason dependent upon falsification) and you conflate testimony which one must warranty with threat of punishment with self reporting which one does not. THAT IS PILPUL. “Excuse Making” THE SIMPLE ANSWER: Religion: what we can get away with? (mysticism), Philosophy: what I can get away with? (sophism), -vs- Science: What we can’t get away with (diligence and warranty). Law: What you can’t get away with (liability). Pseudorationalisms: Astrology, Theology, Numerology, Philosophy, Pilpul, Critique. -vs- Sciences: History, Economics, Accounting, Law, Science, Mathematics, logic (proper). How desperately addicts seek to preserve their lies.
-
How Desperately Addicts Seek to Preserve their Lies.
I engage in science and law, [You] conflate philosophizing (reasoning independent of falsification) with science (reason dependent upon falsification) and you conflate testimony which one must warranty with threat of punishment with self reporting which one does not. THAT IS PILPUL. “Excuse Making” THE SIMPLE ANSWER: Religion: what we can get away with? (mysticism), Philosophy: what I can get away with? (sophism), -vs- Science: What we can’t get away with (diligence and warranty). Law: What you can’t get away with (liability). Pseudorationalisms: Astrology, Theology, Numerology, Philosophy, Pilpul, Critique. -vs- Sciences: History, Economics, Accounting, Law, Science, Mathematics, logic (proper). How desperately addicts seek to preserve their lies.
-
“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requi
—“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 21:03:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035996691642687490
-
Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requir
Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 21:03:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035996529356619776
Reply addressees: @Connecticutting
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035953364658540545
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035953364658540545
-
“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requi
—“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 17:03:00 UTC
-
Is that true Peter, or are you spinning it? You’re spinning it right? He said au
Is that true Peter, or are you spinning it? You’re spinning it right? He said autos are not enough. It would be foolish to cave on autos without the entire package. Especially when our negotiating position is primarily dependent upon leveraging their auto imports. NO MORE PILPUL!
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 16:00:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035920356060618752
Reply addressees: @PeterSchiff
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035293523980050436
IN REPLY TO:
@PeterSchiff
Europe just called Trump’s bluff. The president claimed his goal was zero tariffs. The EU offered him just that and Trump said no. This proves he does not want free trade or even “fair” trade. He just wants to protect inefficient domestic manufacturers from foreign competition!
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035293523980050436
-
“The (((leftist))) response to Western truth telling is to insist that literally
—“The (((leftist))) response to Western truth telling is to insist that literally no knowledge can be known at all. It is only from this subjective reality that their mental poison can take… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289128188350745&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 23:03:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035664450760663041
-
“The (((leftist))) response to Western truth telling is to insist that literally
—“The (((leftist))) response to Western truth telling is to insist that literally no knowledge can be known at all. It is only from this subjective reality that their mental poison can take root.”— Joseph Smith Just as females sew doubt and undermine any change in direction that includes any risk, and promises anything other than an immediate effortless windfall that requires no trust between parties.