Theme: Deception

ABRAHAMISM IN ITS CURRENT STATE

Abrahamism consists of the continuous advancement of the female means of conflict and war: undermining, deceit, and exhaustive relentless diligence in seizing every opportunity to do so. It is the ‘gatherer’ and ‘herd’ strategy of continuous harm. Men tend not to do this, in-group. Instead men use threats of violence and organized violence.

CORE POSTS

https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156859732687264

https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156825094652264

https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156807132857264

https://propertarianism.com/…/abrahamism-is-a-grammar…/

https://propertarianism.com/…/definition-of-abrahamism…/

https://propertarianism.com/2018/06/03/abrahamism/

(Abrahamism, like Sovereignty, via-negativa Truth, The Grammars, and Natural Law are questions that will always require larger answers than people can easily absorb.)

GETTING ANSWERS TO SUCH QUESTIONS

– You can search my FB timeline by ‘curt doolittle abrahamism’. ( @[11019687:2048:Brandon Hayes] also keeps a long threads of related posts by all of us. I don’t think he keeps a ‘FB note’ listing those long posts as an index to his topic-posts, but if he does that would be a big help to people)

– You can search the web site (it uses ElasticSearch now) by just entering ‘abrahamism’. My site is up to date through September first. I tend to update it once a quarter. Although I have gotten behind a number of times.

WORK METHODOLOGY

The way I work is by relating ideas across the spectrum in a series of shorter arguments – because I ‘whittle away’ at the stone so to speak, turning it to view it from different angles, working to gradually expose the figure (truth) below.

I try to produce operational definitions in series, and to describe behavior as supply and demand using those series of definitions.

Then I attempt to turn the fundamental insight into one or more aphorisms (summaries).

Then to create a narrative that explains the topic and its applications.

Then to weave these narratives together using the same constant language – this editing is what exhausts me and is why it takes me so long to produce a work.

WORKFLOW

I work from an outline of the complete scope of human thought.

I work through the outline from metaphysics to group competitive strategy.

Then I work with (many) sketches on FB. I move most of them to the web site.

Then I collect the best of them into what I call ‘short courses’ or collections of posts.

Then I take those ‘short courses’ and put them into the book.

Then edit it all into an explanation.

That’s my workflow.

It’s actually painfully methodical. It just doesn’t look like it to the casual observer, because most people are desirous of rushing to judgment whereas i tend to exhaust a topic completely (very) before adding it to the canon. Then refine the network of concepts added to the canon once there.

cheers.