photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49608047_10156900072117264_6902927856821600256_o_10156900072112264.jpg PROPAGANDA AND MY RESPONSE TO IT.
(heated topic warning)
Some clown spreading propaganda….James SantagataOf course, in this course, Palestinians (or Arabs for that matter) are not classified as Semites, the Jewish guys are no longer white since it has a lower ROI in this use case.Jan 6, 2019, 8:53 PMGreg Woodburythere are a few valid ways to define “semite” but jewish is not one of them lolJan 6, 2019, 9:04 PMAlex MacleodThe origin of anti-semitism is semitism; so how might anti-semitism be eliminated?Jan 6, 2019, 9:05 PMGreg WoodburypagangJan 6, 2019, 9:06 PMGregory GichevMake shareable pl0xJan 6, 2019, 10:14 PMDustin HutchinsonCrushed.Jan 6, 2019, 10:34 PMDustin HutchinsonShut it down, the goyim know!Jan 6, 2019, 10:34 PMDigue Dougwhat a patronising shitJan 7, 2019, 1:54 AMNoah J RevoyThey have spent trillions of dollars trying to get us to love them and hate ourselves. It’s a mental virus designed to weaken us enough that we can be controlled. Curt, myself and others are providing the antidote. The antidote is truth.Jan 7, 2019, 6:10 AMJames SantagataJan 7, 2019, 7:51 AMEric McGowanSo good!Jan 7, 2019, 10:23 AMPROPAGANDA AND MY RESPONSE TO IT.
Everyone is trolling. They are more obvious and not, and more intentional and not. But to some degree we all do nothing but negotiate for our preferences either by shaming, begging, advisin, exchanging, competing, or conquering. 😉
Everyone is trolling. They are more obvious and not, and more intentional and not. But to some degree we all do nothing but negotiate for our preferences either by shaming, begging, advisin, exchanging, competing, or conquering. 😉
Look. I don’t make mistakes.
It’s my job to prosecute pseudoscience. Race denialism, is pseudoscience just, just as much as marxist economics is pseudoscience, as much as theology is pseudoscience, and just as much as postmodernism is a combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and outright denial .
The importance of race may be relative but the existence of races is an observable fact which is fairly obvious from the vast differences in our skulls that equal to the differences in the identification of everything from beetles to mammals.
Ergo if you say certain species and subspecies should be protected and do not say that the same applies to humans then you are simply engaging in fraud and deceit.
Here is a link to the full extent of known peoples, which I update to reflect each major revision in the DNA research once or twice a year. I have not updated it for 2018 findings yet.
Below is the Primate taxonomy. Taxonomy is determined by morphology (gene expression) assisting in the identification of kin groups (kin selection). In other words, morphology assists in the identification of kin, and because of kin better ability to judge the fitness of those mates. (Conversely, crossing kingroup boundaries provides the genetically UNFIT with opportunity that is not available within group. As such superior groups should logically seek to exit non-conforming members, not retain them.)
The difference between races are observable at the morphological, behavioral, aggregate behavioral, and genetic levels, but largely minor other than the fact that the size of the underclass genetic classes versus the middle genetic classes is asymmetric favoring survival under glaciation, as well as survival of winter farming, which led to greater neoteny (‘domestication’) in the far east and far west and less so in the more equatorial regions.
When we notice differences between the races we are largely noticing (and reacting to) greater and lesser degrees of neotonic evolution, and when we stereotype races we are largely noticing and reacting to the sizes of the underclasses in relation tot he middle and upper.
And when we measure the economic, political, social, and intellectual status of civilizations, races, and subraces, we are largely measuring the inability of groups to cull the size of the underclass sufficiently to produce a Pareto distribution capable of economic, political, social, and military competition with neighboring groups.
This is the science. And any contrary argument is false, lie, and fraud. Sorry.
Order:Primates
Suborder:Haplorhini
Infraorder:Simiiformes
Family:Hominidae
Subfamily:Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
… Genus: Pan
… … Species
… … … Pan Troglodytes ( Common Chimpanzee)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … 1. Pan troglodytes verus
… … … … 2. P. t. ellioti
… … … … 3. P. t. troglodytes
… … … … 4. P. t. schweinfurthii
… … Species
… … … Pan Paniscus (Bonobo)
… Genus:Homo
… … Species:
… … … H. sapiens (anatomically modern humans)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … H. S. Sapiens
… … … … … Races:
… … … … … … H. S. Africanus
… … … … … … H. S. Mongoloid
… … … … … … H. S. Caucasoid
The question is only whether we are different races, subspecies, or species, since the definition of subspecies on down is determined by adaptation to geographic conditions and tendency for ingroup selection.
Since humans are happy to attempt to ‘breed with’ (euphemistically) just about anything from dogs, to sheep to donkeys, the we have only marriage selection as an equivalent test of ingroup identification among human races.
Cheers
Look. I don’t make mistakes.
It’s my job to prosecute pseudoscience. Race denialism, is pseudoscience just, just as much as marxist economics is pseudoscience, as much as theology is pseudoscience, and just as much as postmodernism is a combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and outright denial .
The importance of race may be relative but the existence of races is an observable fact which is fairly obvious from the vast differences in our skulls that equal to the differences in the identification of everything from beetles to mammals.
Ergo if you say certain species and subspecies should be protected and do not say that the same applies to humans then you are simply engaging in fraud and deceit.
Here is a link to the full extent of known peoples, which I update to reflect each major revision in the DNA research once or twice a year. I have not updated it for 2018 findings yet.
Below is the Primate taxonomy. Taxonomy is determined by morphology (gene expression) assisting in the identification of kin groups (kin selection). In other words, morphology assists in the identification of kin, and because of kin better ability to judge the fitness of those mates. (Conversely, crossing kingroup boundaries provides the genetically UNFIT with opportunity that is not available within group. As such superior groups should logically seek to exit non-conforming members, not retain them.)
The difference between races are observable at the morphological, behavioral, aggregate behavioral, and genetic levels, but largely minor other than the fact that the size of the underclass genetic classes versus the middle genetic classes is asymmetric favoring survival under glaciation, as well as survival of winter farming, which led to greater neoteny (‘domestication’) in the far east and far west and less so in the more equatorial regions.
When we notice differences between the races we are largely noticing (and reacting to) greater and lesser degrees of neotonic evolution, and when we stereotype races we are largely noticing and reacting to the sizes of the underclasses in relation tot he middle and upper.
And when we measure the economic, political, social, and intellectual status of civilizations, races, and subraces, we are largely measuring the inability of groups to cull the size of the underclass sufficiently to produce a Pareto distribution capable of economic, political, social, and military competition with neighboring groups.
This is the science. And any contrary argument is false, lie, and fraud. Sorry.
Order:Primates
Suborder:Haplorhini
Infraorder:Simiiformes
Family:Hominidae
Subfamily:Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
… Genus: Pan
… … Species
… … … Pan Troglodytes ( Common Chimpanzee)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … 1. Pan troglodytes verus
… … … … 2. P. t. ellioti
… … … … 3. P. t. troglodytes
… … … … 4. P. t. schweinfurthii
… … Species
… … … Pan Paniscus (Bonobo)
… Genus:Homo
… … Species:
… … … H. sapiens (anatomically modern humans)
… … … Subspecies:
… … … … H. S. Sapiens
… … … … … Races:
… … … … … … H. S. Africanus
… … … … … … H. S. Mongoloid
… … … … … … H. S. Caucasoid
The question is only whether we are different races, subspecies, or species, since the definition of subspecies on down is determined by adaptation to geographic conditions and tendency for ingroup selection.
Since humans are happy to attempt to ‘breed with’ (euphemistically) just about anything from dogs, to sheep to donkeys, the we have only marriage selection as an equivalent test of ingroup identification among human races.
Cheers
Last week, @Culttture reported on a big brain argument — @nnTaleb vs. @gmiller on the real world value of IQ — and asked whether @StefanMolyneux would weigh in.
Now, @StefanMolyneux has told Culttture, “Taleb blocked me.”
Do you want to see these two 🧠heavyweights debate? https://t.co/EkAGEC65uk
I am probably three standard deviations above you dear. I do science. That’s why your folk are afraid of me. Because science unlike Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism doesn’t lie. 😉
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
There are always suckers for the shortcuts of sophism, pseudoscience, and the occult-supernatural. Most of them are women if it is submission (harmony). The rest are unsuccessful men if class-rotation(dominance). And alway pseudo-intellectuals leading with pretense of knowledge.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
1) Critique without corresponding solution. 2) Claim of solution without providing one. 3) Pretense of knowledge of organization 4) False claim and false promise of the good 5) Rinse and repeat of semitic authoritarianism. ie: Postmodernism: critique, sophism, ’empty purse’
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
I am going to enjoy increasing the scope of my reputation by gutting Taleb’s pseudoscience, and in doing so explain why a certain tribe commits so much evil.
