Theme: Deception

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542557719 Timestamp) GOVERNING IS SIMPLE IF TRUTHFUL AND DIFFICULT IF DECEITFUL AND CORRUPT by JG Garner Agreed. Black and white. Dark or light. North or south. East or west. I read a book a few years back. A book well known to many. I will paraphrase the general idea. The author wrote governing is not hard. It is easy. The corrupt make it complicated. The compromised make the waters murky. It’s simple. Is it good for the nation? Is it good for the economy? Does it weaken us? Do we want those convicted of the most heinous crimes to still breath. As long as they live, they could be amongst us “free men” again. I’ve provided a small paragraph on an entire chapter. But you get my point. Things should be pretty cut and dry. In the criminal justice system we now look at the accused in a sympathetic view. Was his life hard? Did his parents beat him? Ect. The only thing we need to unwind is was a crime committed? Did the accused commit said crime? Is the victim dead or injured.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542550908 Timestamp) THE GENEALOGY OF ANTI-WHITE HATE SPEECH (the historical evolution of the art of fraud) anglophobia (anglos) anglophobic anglophobe … teutophobia (germanics) … teutophobic … teutophobe … … blancophobia (whites) … … blancophobic … … blancophobe … … … androphobia (men) … … … androphobic … … … androphobe … … … … naturophobia (darwin, genetics, gender, race) … … … … naturopohbic … … … … naturophobe … … … … … denial (truthophobia) … … … … … denialism (truthophobic) … … … … … denialist (truthophobe) … … … … … … sophistry (fraud by verbalism) … … … … … … sophism … … … … … … sophist … … … … … … … idealistry (platonistry) (fraud by ideal) … … … … … … … idealism (platonism) … … … … … … … idealist (platonist) … … … … … … … … pseudoscientry (fraud by falsehood) … … … … … … … … pseudoscience … … … … … … … … pseudoscientist … … … … … … … … … fictionalistry (fraud by fiction) … … … … … … … … … fictionalism … … … … … … … … … fictionalist … … … … … … … … … … deception (fraud by deception) … … … … … … … … … … deceit … … … … … … … … … … deceiver … … … … … … … … … … … lying (outright lying) … … … … … … … … … … … lie … … … … … … … … … … … liar

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542557719 Timestamp) GOVERNING IS SIMPLE IF TRUTHFUL AND DIFFICULT IF DECEITFUL AND CORRUPT by JG Garner Agreed. Black and white. Dark or light. North or south. East or west. I read a book a few years back. A book well known to many. I will paraphrase the general idea. The author wrote governing is not hard. It is easy. The corrupt make it complicated. The compromised make the waters murky. It’s simple. Is it good for the nation? Is it good for the economy? Does it weaken us? Do we want those convicted of the most heinous crimes to still breath. As long as they live, they could be amongst us “free men” again. I’ve provided a small paragraph on an entire chapter. But you get my point. Things should be pretty cut and dry. In the criminal justice system we now look at the accused in a sympathetic view. Was his life hard? Did his parents beat him? Ect. The only thing we need to unwind is was a crime committed? Did the accused commit said crime? Is the victim dead or injured.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542550908 Timestamp) THE GENEALOGY OF ANTI-WHITE HATE SPEECH (the historical evolution of the art of fraud) anglophobia (anglos) anglophobic anglophobe … teutophobia (germanics) … teutophobic … teutophobe … … blancophobia (whites) … … blancophobic … … blancophobe … … … androphobia (men) … … … androphobic … … … androphobe … … … … naturophobia (darwin, genetics, gender, race) … … … … naturopohbic … … … … naturophobe … … … … … denial (truthophobia) … … … … … denialism (truthophobic) … … … … … denialist (truthophobe) … … … … … … sophistry (fraud by verbalism) … … … … … … sophism … … … … … … sophist … … … … … … … idealistry (platonistry) (fraud by ideal) … … … … … … … idealism (platonism) … … … … … … … idealist (platonist) … … … … … … … … pseudoscientry (fraud by falsehood) … … … … … … … … pseudoscience … … … … … … … … pseudoscientist … … … … … … … … … fictionalistry (fraud by fiction) … … … … … … … … … fictionalism … … … … … … … … … fictionalist … … … … … … … … … … deception (fraud by deception) … … … … … … … … … … deceit … … … … … … … … … … deceiver … … … … … … … … … … … lying (outright lying) … … … … … … … … … … … lie … … … … … … … … … … … liar

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542678665 Timestamp) I am almost at the point where listening to economists sounds like listening to marxists, sounds like listening to theologians. All the same. Testimonialism is a necessity for human evolution.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542678665 Timestamp) I am almost at the point where listening to economists sounds like listening to marxists, sounds like listening to theologians. All the same. Testimonialism is a necessity for human evolution.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542687553 Timestamp) a meme, is a way in, as is a reframe, malformed data, buffer overwrite, as simple as a corrupt .gif and root access to make the target a f-ck puppet thus FPML – f-ck puppet markup language — james santagata

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542687553 Timestamp) a meme, is a way in, as is a reframe, malformed data, buffer overwrite, as simple as a corrupt .gif and root access to make the target a f-ck puppet thus FPML – f-ck puppet markup language — james santagata

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543004881 Timestamp) THE STRUCTURE OF THE OTHER GREAT LIE: MONOTHEISM (POLITY) VS HEATHENISM (HEARTH) (important) I talk all the time about the lie of socialism vs capitalism instead of rule by man vs rule of law. But the equally common lie is that of heathenism (paganism) vs monotheism, instead of rule of law vs rule of lies. Our sovereignty > our law of tort > our reason > our empiricism > our science > our TESTIMONIALISM. We can converge on rule of law (science) or diverge by rule of men and their lies. Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Reason, Empiricism, Science, And Markets in Everything. The literary means (analogies) by which we teach these principles need no magic, no superstition, just education. Love of our own is enough. Truth is enough. Reality is enough for the gods we have become.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542998232 Timestamp) EXAMPLE: RABBINICAL ARGUMENT > JESUIT ARGUMENT So for example, you just engaged in the following deceptions: 1) That the economic history of the world and europe has anything to do with being educated in a european country. 2) That taxation is equivalent to corruption and capital sequestration 3) That whether you are ‘convinced’ or not is a matter of the truth or falsehood of an argument – rather than a measure of your dishonesty. 4) The charity by the church, obtained by deceit, corruption, and rents was somehow comparable to the economic consequences of their corruption, deceit, rents, and capital sequestering. 5) That the (insignificant) rate of intellectual, technological, material, progress under the church was vastly lower, and that what progress that WAS made was due to the aristocracy and the military, metallurgy, and trade despite the church’s mandate of ignorance. 6) That Aristotle was somehow not practicing the european traditional method of legal-empirical argument, and applying it as a means of correcting Plato’s idealism, and that it is necessary to be of greek (now greco-anatolian) origin to categorize his thought as european. 7) That it was not the eastern non-roman empire in collusion with the egyptian and syrian that intentionally destroyed roman civilization through suppression of it’s traditions, closing of its schools, burning of its buildings, and murder of its teachers and rulers. I mean, that’s a lot of lies in half a dozen comments. And you want me to take you as other than a perfect demonstration of the abrahamic method of deceit: Sophism, Pseudoscience, and Supernaturalism? I mean you just illustrated my point so thoroughly that it’s hard to imagine anyone could be that intellectually dishonest without studying how to be.