Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541988685 Timestamp) Never counter-signal when the most obvious incentive is cowardice.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542044411 Timestamp) Authoritarians (Absolutists) Suffer from the same problem as do Marxists: “Well it didn’t work here and here, but that’s because I would do it the RIGHT way. When the entire problem is, that an absolutist can in fact know what is wrong, but cannot know what is right or best broadly enough to govern. Knowledge is not commutable between disciplines. Ergo, absolutism fails for the same reason communism and socialism fail: Hayekian Knowledge at Scale. So A perfect government consists of SPECIALIZING in one’s domain of interest: Self-Interest. The self interest of the monarchy is his CAPITAL: Aesthetics (The Arts and Aesthetic Commons); Institutions (means of producing prosperity), Demographics (quality of those he rules), and Military (Power to deny usurpation). But the market that preserves each of those systems of capital formation (aesthetic, economic, human, and defensive) is created by the LAW (judges and courts) whose sole purpose is to prevent usurpation of the capital production of each of classes (Artistic, Economic, Familial, and Martial). This is not a bourgeois political bias to the production of commons suitable to the population, it is merely SCIENCE of dividing the scope of what is decidable among those that can do so. Ergo, Monarchy is the judge of last resort in all matters, and it is in his monumental interest to control the arts, and therefore the people VIA the arts. To raise new funds the monarchy can direct its income from TERRITORIAL RENTS the same way the NOBILITY can raise new funds by investing in COMMERCIAL PROFITS. But neither may impose upon the other – although the judiciary and military may choose otherwise in time of war (dictatorship).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541993767 Timestamp) (fyi: james is a fking machine. i could spend my day quoting his pm’s. its like a propaganda and counter signal firehose, lol seriously. i chat more with him than everyone else combined. and mostly i listen. its genius running commentary on the conduct of information warfare… lol. except its so brutal lol)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542044411 Timestamp) Authoritarians (Absolutists) Suffer from the same problem as do Marxists: “Well it didn’t work here and here, but that’s because I would do it the RIGHT way. When the entire problem is, that an absolutist can in fact know what is wrong, but cannot know what is right or best broadly enough to govern. Knowledge is not commutable between disciplines. Ergo, absolutism fails for the same reason communism and socialism fail: Hayekian Knowledge at Scale. So A perfect government consists of SPECIALIZING in one’s domain of interest: Self-Interest. The self interest of the monarchy is his CAPITAL: Aesthetics (The Arts and Aesthetic Commons); Institutions (means of producing prosperity), Demographics (quality of those he rules), and Military (Power to deny usurpation). But the market that preserves each of those systems of capital formation (aesthetic, economic, human, and defensive) is created by the LAW (judges and courts) whose sole purpose is to prevent usurpation of the capital production of each of classes (Artistic, Economic, Familial, and Martial). This is not a bourgeois political bias to the production of commons suitable to the population, it is merely SCIENCE of dividing the scope of what is decidable among those that can do so. Ergo, Monarchy is the judge of last resort in all matters, and it is in his monumental interest to control the arts, and therefore the people VIA the arts. To raise new funds the monarchy can direct its income from TERRITORIAL RENTS the same way the NOBILITY can raise new funds by investing in COMMERCIAL PROFITS. But neither may impose upon the other – although the judiciary and military may choose otherwise in time of war (dictatorship).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541993767 Timestamp) (fyi: james is a fking machine. i could spend my day quoting his pm’s. its like a propaganda and counter signal firehose, lol seriously. i chat more with him than everyone else combined. and mostly i listen. its genius running commentary on the conduct of information warfare… lol. except its so brutal lol)

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1542076253 Timestamp) POSTMODERN ASS CLOWNS: MORE ON THE NONSENSE OF GENERATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY Of course it’s nonsense. Postmodernism’s “Social Construction” + Chomsky’s Generative Grammar (From Turing) = “Generative anthropology”. A bit of wishful thinking masquerading as an “hypothesis” – a contrivance as means by which to advocate for Relativism, Undecidability, Arbitrary Truth, and Internal consistency without external correspondence. In other words yet another iteration of the attempt by the literary, continental, theological, essayists and moral fictionalists (desperately in search of a science ) to continue their revolt against anglo empiricism, science, economics finance, law, and darwinian evolution given the series of failures of europeans to produce a fictional or mythological, or spiritual, pseudo rational, or pseudoscientific method via Derrida, foucault, Adorno et al, marx, boas, freud, rousseau, kant et al. There is some (mentally unhealthy ) group of people that demand a continuous narrative dream world providing analogistic (literary) rather than descriptive (scientific, organic, mechanical), as a means of preserving the means of deception and coercion available when the narrative diverges from descriptive to analogical. This divergence creates opportunity for the cunning to manipulate or deceive or provoke submission under pretense of knowledge that parents employ over children and professors over students and priests and politicians over adults. All of postmodern thought seeks nothing more than to continue the priestly method of getting status, power, advantage and income from persuasion by these frauds. Alinsky is the most honest postmodernist. The rest are simply less honest. In the case of Thomas and Spencer and crew this is just secular empty verbalism as a replacement for theology for the reasons I stated – because they lack insight into knowledge, policy, or process and invent fictions for themselves and others by which to sedate themselves and obtain attention from the … unsophisticated … as a cover for powerlessness alienation, and failure to compete seually, socially, economically, and politically. Which means they are little different from the rest of the postmodern academy: publishing fairy stories as means of getting grants and selling nonsense courses to young women easily falling victim to non existent tragedies that can be rallied against verbally without surviving in the marke for a productive good. Pathetic really. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93e8BOk2oOE

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542053522 Timestamp) THE FACT THAT I (WE) HAVE BOTH ADVOCATES AND CRITICS IS EVIDENCE OF THE VERACITY OF THE IDEAS —“Hello, I hear you’re a Bad Man with some extreme views. Someone posted screen caps of you. Your position seemed reasonable to me so thought I’d friend request you. We have mutual friends who are in both camps about you: pro and against.”— A New Friend Hi. Well, ‘bad man’ is probably due to my online persona which is a little over the top for marketing (and education) purposes. The fact that I have pro and against camps is merely evidence of the success of the system of thought generating debate. (one way or another at least men have something worthy of debate). The truth is I CANNOT FIND A CRITIC with any argument any longer. All I can find is people who have yet to understand what I argue, or who argue the sufficiency of the solution, or who argue the practicality of the solution. In general – and I am serious – it is extremely unlikely that for the next few generations at least (if ever), anyone will propose a counter argument any more than they will propose one counter to darwin…. 😉 (Seriously, I have had no critic emerge other than the sufficiency of the argument, to provide a via-positiva solution to satisfy the market demand for a personal philosophy. And it will become very clear over the coming months that what I said would happen, has – that people who want to produce the via positiva around the aesthetic (elite), martial (physical) and the emotional (stoicism), have emerged to satisfy that market demand – meaning we will in fact produce physical, emotional, and intellectual programs with coherent and consistent themes. The fact that we have reached critical mass recently is probably becoming obvious – even if that critical mass has come more so from the personal philosophical side of the movement than the analytical that I produce.)

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1542076253 Timestamp) POSTMODERN ASS CLOWNS: MORE ON THE NONSENSE OF GENERATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY Of course it’s nonsense. Postmodernism’s “Social Construction” + Chomsky’s Generative Grammar (From Turing) = “Generative anthropology”. A bit of wishful thinking masquerading as an “hypothesis” – a contrivance as means by which to advocate for Relativism, Undecidability, Arbitrary Truth, and Internal consistency without external correspondence. In other words yet another iteration of the attempt by the literary, continental, theological, essayists and moral fictionalists (desperately in search of a science ) to continue their revolt against anglo empiricism, science, economics finance, law, and darwinian evolution given the series of failures of europeans to produce a fictional or mythological, or spiritual, pseudo rational, or pseudoscientific method via Derrida, foucault, Adorno et al, marx, boas, freud, rousseau, kant et al. There is some (mentally unhealthy ) group of people that demand a continuous narrative dream world providing analogistic (literary) rather than descriptive (scientific, organic, mechanical), as a means of preserving the means of deception and coercion available when the narrative diverges from descriptive to analogical. This divergence creates opportunity for the cunning to manipulate or deceive or provoke submission under pretense of knowledge that parents employ over children and professors over students and priests and politicians over adults. All of postmodern thought seeks nothing more than to continue the priestly method of getting status, power, advantage and income from persuasion by these frauds. Alinsky is the most honest postmodernist. The rest are simply less honest. In the case of Thomas and Spencer and crew this is just secular empty verbalism as a replacement for theology for the reasons I stated – because they lack insight into knowledge, policy, or process and invent fictions for themselves and others by which to sedate themselves and obtain attention from the … unsophisticated … as a cover for powerlessness alienation, and failure to compete seually, socially, economically, and politically. Which means they are little different from the rest of the postmodern academy: publishing fairy stories as means of getting grants and selling nonsense courses to young women easily falling victim to non existent tragedies that can be rallied against verbally without surviving in the marke for a productive good. Pathetic really. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93e8BOk2oOE

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542053522 Timestamp) THE FACT THAT I (WE) HAVE BOTH ADVOCATES AND CRITICS IS EVIDENCE OF THE VERACITY OF THE IDEAS —“Hello, I hear you’re a Bad Man with some extreme views. Someone posted screen caps of you. Your position seemed reasonable to me so thought I’d friend request you. We have mutual friends who are in both camps about you: pro and against.”— A New Friend Hi. Well, ‘bad man’ is probably due to my online persona which is a little over the top for marketing (and education) purposes. The fact that I have pro and against camps is merely evidence of the success of the system of thought generating debate. (one way or another at least men have something worthy of debate). The truth is I CANNOT FIND A CRITIC with any argument any longer. All I can find is people who have yet to understand what I argue, or who argue the sufficiency of the solution, or who argue the practicality of the solution. In general – and I am serious – it is extremely unlikely that for the next few generations at least (if ever), anyone will propose a counter argument any more than they will propose one counter to darwin…. 😉 (Seriously, I have had no critic emerge other than the sufficiency of the argument, to provide a via-positiva solution to satisfy the market demand for a personal philosophy. And it will become very clear over the coming months that what I said would happen, has – that people who want to produce the via positiva around the aesthetic (elite), martial (physical) and the emotional (stoicism), have emerged to satisfy that market demand – meaning we will in fact produce physical, emotional, and intellectual programs with coherent and consistent themes. The fact that we have reached critical mass recently is probably becoming obvious – even if that critical mass has come more so from the personal philosophical side of the movement than the analytical that I produce.)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542126100 Timestamp) NO, I’M HONESTLY CALLY POMO’S CRIMINALS. As for dishonest, no, I am HONESTLY (Truthfully also) claiming GA like POMO is a pseudoscientific fraud for the purpose of restoring a secular cult of abrahamic equalitarianism by the same incremental techniques that were used in the ancient world to undermine the aristocracy, by the same process of selling to women in particular and the useful idiots that pursue the favor of those women, to bring about our conquest yet again by immigration and displacement. And no, there is no value in trying to recreate the levantine culture here in the west, It’s been failing for thousands of years. The chinese and the europeans had it right. BUILD WALLS. WOrse, I am claiming that the only incentive to pursue a pseudoscientific fraud is to use cunning as a weapon of coercion against those lacking sufficient agency to comprehend the consequences of the actions thus inspired. So I am honestly calling such people not just fools, but frauds, and in very real terms – criminals, in a crime against humanity. Is that over the top enough? ;)