Theme: Deception

  • In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of confli

    In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 17:10:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178356316957483008

    Reply addressees: @mechasixvii @HarmlessYardDog @trutsle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178355925817712641


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @mechasixvii @HarmlessYardDog @trutsle In this context, when people are expressing trust, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1178355925817712641


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @mechasixvii @HarmlessYardDog @trutsle In this context, when people are expressing trust, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1178355925817712641

  • In this context, when people are expressing trust, it only refers to three facto

    In this context, when people are expressing trust, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 17:08:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178355925817712641

    Reply addressees: @mechasixvii @HarmlessYardDog @trutsle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178351988364496899


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178351988364496899

  • To reinforce your observation with a bit more edge: westerners produce commons t

    To reinforce your observation with a bit more edge: westerners produce commons that other people cannot produce, and we do by NOT DOING evil: lying, misleading, cheating, stealing, free riding, corruption, as much as what we DO: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Heroism.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 16:22:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178344252113391617

    Reply addressees: @HarmlessYardDog @trutsle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178343649421271041


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HarmlessYardDog @trutsle Well done. Follower just made me aware of you.
    Sovereignty demands Reciprocity, where demand for Reciprocity includes all demonstrated interests, whether bodily, family, physical, normative, traditional, informational, or the civic and political institutions that defend them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1178343649421271041


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @HarmlessYardDog @trutsle Well done. Follower just made me aware of you.
    Sovereignty demands Reciprocity, where demand for Reciprocity includes all demonstrated interests, whether bodily, family, physical, normative, traditional, informational, or the civic and political institutions that defend them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1178343649421271041

  • BECAUSE OF THE TECHNIQUE USED TO SELL AND ARGUE THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS —“Can

    BECAUSE OF THE TECHNIQUE USED TO SELL AND ARGUE THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS

    —“Can you explain how that paradigm is Abrahamic?”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    (Referring to capitalism vs socialism instead of rule of law and arbitrary rule)

    Using the method of persuasion consisting of false promise, pilpul, and critique (undermining) by which the abrahamic religions of the old world, and the new world: marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, and denialism, with of course, fundamentalist islam persisting.

    It’s the female method of undermining, rather than western masculine truth and reciprocity.

    in effect the abrahamic method (undermining) is the primary competitor to european science and chinese reason. It is the art of lying.

    Study women’s conflict strategy.

    —“I don’t see what that has to do with Abraham.”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    Then maybe you don’t need to. Unless you want to learn the different means by which different civilizations conduct their propaganda (mythology) and group strategy then it’s not important for you.

    Just learn the technique, learn the technique of western truth, and every civilization employs a system of argument (persuasion) somewhere between european truth and abrahamic lying, with chinese closest to european, followed by hindustani, followed by buddhist followed by abrahamic (middle eastern, monotheistic, supernatural sophism, and its modern reformation in pseudoscience, and sophism).

    If we use the term rabbinical (who invented it) then we exclude christianity, islam, judaism, marxism, freudianism, boasianism, postmoernism, feminism and denialism (political correctness) which are all constructed by the same means. So we use abahamic to encompass both the first generation of abrahamic sophisms (abrahamic religions) and the second generation (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism, political correctness).

    This (The Grammars) is one of the foundational methodologies in propertarianism:

    0. Enumeration, Serialization, Disambiguation, and Operationalization

    1. Testimonial Truth and The Grammars of truth and deceit

    2. Reciprocity, Demonstrated Interest

    3. Compatibilism

    4. Strict construction of law

    5. Perfect Government

    There is much more than that but that’s about all people can manage at one time.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:28:00 UTC

  • The entirety of the left is based upon the industrialization of the spread of fa

    The entirety of the left is based upon the industrialization of the spread of falsehood by gossip, and the suppression of truth by rallying, shouting down, and undermining. And that entirety is dependent upon electricity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 01:19:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178117140664197121

  • The only consistent thing I complain about is their dishonesty, face before trut

    The only consistent thing I complain about is their dishonesty, face before truth, brutality, and criminality. It’s not like I criticize the government. 😉 lolz


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 00:56:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178111251517497349

    Reply addressees: @stevesargent10

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178109587683250176


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178109587683250176

  • The entirety of the left is based upon the industrialization of the spread of fa

    The entirety of the left is based upon the industrialization of the spread of falsehood by gossip, and the suppression of truth by rallying, shouting down, and undermining. And that entirety is dependent upon electricity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 21:19:00 UTC

  • LET’S GET DOWN TO IT. LIBERTARIANISM IS DEAD. AND WE WERE ALL USEFUL IDIOTS TO T

    LET’S GET DOWN TO IT. LIBERTARIANISM IS DEAD. AND WE WERE ALL USEFUL IDIOTS TO THE ENEMY

    —“Let’s just get down to it. … libertarianism simply means you don’t f*** with people and leave them generally alone so long as they’re not messing with anyone and doing things wrong to other people directly and intentionally. The free market is the most important thing outside of that. We support family values and other things only for the purpose of having able bodies to then contribute to the free market with their mind in the right place.”— Kevin Flynn

    ^The problem is, that’s like marxism, in that it specifies goals, not means of achieving them (a sequence of testable operations) or the means of sustaining them. So it’s like saying “i wanna feel good’. It doesn’t mean anything other than whatever nonsense the individual dreams up in his head. Thats why it works. It’s the abrahamic means of suggestion. You actually supply whatever the meaning is, because there is no content to supply meaning in the statements.

    So, lets get down to it.

    Libertarianism either means rule of law by reciprocity that insures us all against conflict, where conflict consists of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others (negatives), codified in tangible categories we call ‘property’ (positives), with MANDATORY contribution to the defense of rule of law from all enemies both external and internal that would seek to incrementally or radically impose violations of those interests, with the MARKET of competition for territory population and rule, determining the necessary mandatory contribution to the defense of that rule of law. Period.

    Either that’s your definition, or you’re just making up fantasy stories like communism. In fact, that is what you’re doing, and what most libertarians are doing, they are promoting common property marxism, instead of private property marxism.

    So no, “Lets Get Down To It” means libertarians are either demanding rule of law and contribution to the defense of it by reciprocal insurance of it, or they are just asking for communes with private instead of common property – which is exactly what the ‘inventors’ of left-propertarianism (leave me alone) indented you to think.

    There is no such thing as “libertarianism”. There is just rule of law and the production of commons sufficient to preserve it. Sovereignty, liberty, and freedom cannot be produced by any other possible means.

    Not Hoppe’s fantasy of recreating the German Free cities (by permission), or Rothbard’s dream of recreating the Pale of Settlement, or the Ghetto (by permission), or the dream of recreating the American frontier (by permission). There are no ‘borderlands’ left to settle on behalf of a state in exchange for defense but the ‘liberty’ to preserve local custom (which is the meaning of liberty.)

    So I’ll call out all libertarians as Useful Idiots of the enemy. Suckers. Ass Clowns. There is no such thing as Libertarianism any More than there is such a thing as it’s mirror image: communism.

    You’re either a Propertarian or a fucking idiot. And there isn’t any debate to be had. It’s not even open to discussion, only education.

    One has liberty by permission of a state. One has freedom by permission of an owner. One has sovereignty because a group of men are willing and able to deny other men of any practical scale, from imposing something other than rule of law by reciprocity upon them.

    LIBERTARIANISM DOESN”T EXIST. It’s another false dichotomy like Socialism vs Capitalism.

    There is only rule of law and the property that results from it, and the commons necessary to defend it, or there is rule by man and all are subjects to those who rule, with the degree of liberty, freedom, or slavery imposed upon them against their will – for having FAILED to produce a condition of sovereignty.

    For this reason I call Propertarianism SOVEREIGNTARIANISM and I almost changed the name to it. And maybe I should have. Liberty consist of permission for those who live in border areas to have defense of superior peoples in exchange for temporarily holding territory – meaning, buying an option on territory – until sufficiently developed to rule, or sufficiently useful to exchange with a competitor.

    Libertarians are beggars like marxists. Sovereigntarians are OWNERS of their territory, polity, institutions, norms, traditions, and all commons under their domain.

    Libertarianism then is sophistry. We either are sovereigntarians descriptively, propertarians operationally, or absolute fking idiots practicing yet another sophomoric secular religion produced by the enemy, just like marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism, and the three abrahamic religions – although, we gotta give christianity a pass having been so thoroughly germanicized into a folk religion.

    We are warriors. Or we are slaves.

    Choose.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 14:26:00 UTC

  • BECAUSE OF THE TECHNIQUE USED TO SELL AND ARGUE THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS —“Can

    BECAUSE OF THE TECHNIQUE USED TO SELL AND ARGUE THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS

    —“Can you explain how that paradigm is Abrahamic?”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    (Referring to capitalism vs socialism instead of rule of law and arbitrary rule)

    Using the method of persuasion consisting of false promise, pilpul, and critique (undermining) by which the abrahamic religions of the old world, and the new world: marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, and denialism, with of course, fundamentalist islam persisting.

    It’s the female method of undermining, rather than western masculine truth and reciprocity.

    in effect the abrahamic method (undermining) is the primary competitor to european science and chinese reason. It is the art of lying.

    Study women’s conflict strategy.

    —“I don’t see what that has to do with Abraham.”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    Then maybe you don’t need to. Unless you want to learn the different means by which different civilizations conduct their propaganda (mythology) and group strategy then it’s not important for you.

    Just learn the technique, learn the technique of western truth, and every civilization employs a system of argument (persuasion) somewhere between european truth and abrahamic lying, with chinese closest to european, followed by hindustani, followed by buddhist followed by abrahamic (middle eastern, monotheistic, supernatural sophism, and its modern reformation in pseudoscience, and sophism).

    If we use the term rabbinical (who invented it) then we exclude christianity, islam, judaism, marxism, freudianism, boasianism, postmoernism, feminism and denialism (political correctness) which are all constructed by the same means. So we use abahamic to encompass both the first generation of abrahamic sophisms (abrahamic religions) and the second generation (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism, political correctness).

    This (The Gramamars) is one of the foundational methodologies in propertarianism:

    0. Enumeration, Serialization, Disambiguation, and Operationalization

    1. Testimonial Truth and The Grammars of truth and deceit

    2. Reciprocity, Demonstrated Interest

    3. Compatibilism

    4. Strict construction of law

    5. Perfect Government

    There is much more than that but that’s about all people can manage at one time.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 11:36:00 UTC

  • Thanks for wasting my time, which is usual for wanna be intellects, overinvested

    Thanks for wasting my time, which is usual for wanna be intellects, overinvested in sophisms manufactured for the consumption of useful idiots. Libertarianism in the rothbardian tradition is just common property marxism, an attempt to recreate the corruption of the pale.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 03:21:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177785268411260929

    Reply addressees: @audger

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177784855624593408


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177784855624593408