Mar 10, 2020, 10:54 PM The Left= Female Conflict Strategy: Deny, Avoid, Substitute Approval for Truth, Justify, Use Sophistry, Ad Hominem(gsrrm), Rally, Undermine, Strawman, Bait Into Conflict, Bait Into Hazard, Free Ride, Rent Seek, Hyperconsumption, Hypergamy, “Unconscious: The Men Will Take Care of It” The left has to lie. WHY? The suite of programs we have seen in marxism, communism, socialism, Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denialism(political correctness) are an attempt to undermine every single system of class and gender harmony in tripartite western civilization from within by the false promise of freedom from evolutionary pressures (Darwin), under the pretense that admittedly meritocratic and eugenic western civlization oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated ourselves. And that this strategy – the cause of our successes – is antithetical to the female reproductive strategy, female cognition, and the female group strategy of intellectuals behind marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism. We enfranchised this hostile intellectual group, and women at roughly the same time, and gave elites at practicing the female group strategy, and an audience of easily deceived newly enfranchised females, on top of our traditional underclasses, a market to ply with 51% of the vote, 70% of consumption of government services, and 70% of consumer spending. And we did not give them time to integrate into the franchise, rule of law, meritocracy, and to absorb the shock, before the postwar campaign to undermine western civlization through them. Marxism, postmodernism, feminism together are just a repeated of judaism, christianity islam to undermine the aristocratic empires of the ancient world. And we saw the loss of the arts, letters, culture, civilization and genomes of five great civilizations civilization reduced to dysgenia, decline, regression, ignorance, and superstition. The female group conflict strategy? ie: bait others into conflict. 1. Feminine Undermining: Interpersonal and Social Superpredators 2. Female advocacy strategy: “heaping undue praise”, give everyone a prize, giving false compliments. 3. Female Conflict Strategy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, straw manning, and reputation destruction without end (destruction). 4. Female anti-social behavior: promiscuity, impulsivity, drugs, alcohol, lying, needling, conflict generation, attention seeking, shrilling, outraging. 5. Female Technique: Seduction: False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard. —“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty; By Pretense of Plausible Deniability; DespiteDeliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s); And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), And Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, And Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”— False promise of freedom from low status and agency. False promise of ability to rule and develop agency. Destruction of civlization culture, arts, knowledge, traditions. The repeat of the christian destruction of the ancient world. Through women and slaves in the old world. Through women and immigrants in the new world. If not for immigrants we would have defeated them. Democracy by 92 Intelligence differences by 99 Gender differences by 12 Group differences in 19 Science would have won. They won by the immigration act. Not by ideas. The romans were too tolerant. So are we. The only way to defeat a social superpredator is with a physical superpredator.
Theme: Deception
-
The Frankfurt School Cancer
The Frankfurt School Cancer https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-frankfurt-school-cancer/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 22:02:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266127742157848579
-
Why Does the Left Have to Lie and Deny Differences?
Mar 18, 2020, 12:39 PM The Left= Female Conflict Strategy: Deny, Avoid, Substitute Approval for Truth, Justify, Use Sophistry, Ad Hominem(gsrrm), Rally, Undermine, Strawman, Bait Into Conflict, Bait Into Hazard, Free Ride, Rent Seek, Hyperconsumption, Hypergamy, “Unconscious: The Men Will Take Care of It” The left has to lie. WHY? The suite of programs we have seen in marxism, communism, socialism, Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denialism(political correctness) are an attempt to undermine every single system of class and gender harmony in tripartite western civilization from within by the false promise of freedom from evolutionary pressures (Darwin), under the pretense that admittedly meritocratic and eugenic western civlization oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated ourselves. And that this strategy – the cause of our successes – is antithetical to the female reproductive strategy, female cognition, and the female group strategy of intellectuals behind marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism. We enfranchised this hostile intellectual group, and women at roughly the same time, and gave elites at practicing the female group strategy, and an audience of easily deceived newly enfranchised females, on top of our traditional underclasses, a market to ply with 51% of the vote, 70% of consumption of government services, and 70% of consumer spending. And we did not give them time to integrate into the franchise, rule of law, meritocracy, and to absorb the shock, before the postwar campaign to undermine western civlization through them. Marxism, postmodernism, feminism together are just a repeated of judaism, christianity islam to undermine the aristocratic empires of the ancient world. And we saw the loss of the arts, letters, culture, civilization and genomes of five great civilizations civilization reduced to dysgenia, decline, regression, ignorance, and superstition. The female group conflict strategy? ie: bait others into conflict.
1. Feminine Undermining: Interpersonal and Social Superpredators 2. Female advocacy strategy: “heaping undue praise”, give everyone a prize, giving false compliments. 3. Female Conflict Strategy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, straw manning, and reputation destruction without end (destruction). 4. Female anti-social behavior: promiscuity, impulsivity, drugs, alcohol, lying, needling, conflict generation, attention seeking, shrilling, outraging. 5. Female Technique: Seduction: False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard.
—“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty; By Pretense of Plausible Deniability; DespiteDeliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s); And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), And Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, And Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”— False promise of freedom from low status and agency. False promise of ability to rule and develop agency. Destruction of civlization culture, arts, knowledge, traditions. The repeat of the christian destruction of the ancient world. Through women and slaves in the old world. Through women and immigrants in the new world. If not for immigrants we would have defeated them. Democracy by 92 Intelligence differences by 99 Gender differences by 12 Group differences in 19 Science would have won. They won by the immigration act. Not by ideas. The romans were too tolerant. So are we. The only way to defeat a social superpredator is with a physical superpredator.
-
Why Does the Left Have to Lie and Deny Differences?
Mar 18, 2020, 12:39 PM The Left= Female Conflict Strategy: Deny, Avoid, Substitute Approval for Truth, Justify, Use Sophistry, Ad Hominem(gsrrm), Rally, Undermine, Strawman, Bait Into Conflict, Bait Into Hazard, Free Ride, Rent Seek, Hyperconsumption, Hypergamy, “Unconscious: The Men Will Take Care of It” The left has to lie. WHY? The suite of programs we have seen in marxism, communism, socialism, Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denialism(political correctness) are an attempt to undermine every single system of class and gender harmony in tripartite western civilization from within by the false promise of freedom from evolutionary pressures (Darwin), under the pretense that admittedly meritocratic and eugenic western civlization oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated ourselves. And that this strategy – the cause of our successes – is antithetical to the female reproductive strategy, female cognition, and the female group strategy of intellectuals behind marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism. We enfranchised this hostile intellectual group, and women at roughly the same time, and gave elites at practicing the female group strategy, and an audience of easily deceived newly enfranchised females, on top of our traditional underclasses, a market to ply with 51% of the vote, 70% of consumption of government services, and 70% of consumer spending. And we did not give them time to integrate into the franchise, rule of law, meritocracy, and to absorb the shock, before the postwar campaign to undermine western civlization through them. Marxism, postmodernism, feminism together are just a repeated of judaism, christianity islam to undermine the aristocratic empires of the ancient world. And we saw the loss of the arts, letters, culture, civilization and genomes of five great civilizations civilization reduced to dysgenia, decline, regression, ignorance, and superstition. The female group conflict strategy? ie: bait others into conflict.
1. Feminine Undermining: Interpersonal and Social Superpredators 2. Female advocacy strategy: “heaping undue praise”, give everyone a prize, giving false compliments. 3. Female Conflict Strategy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, straw manning, and reputation destruction without end (destruction). 4. Female anti-social behavior: promiscuity, impulsivity, drugs, alcohol, lying, needling, conflict generation, attention seeking, shrilling, outraging. 5. Female Technique: Seduction: False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard.
—“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty; By Pretense of Plausible Deniability; DespiteDeliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s); And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), And Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, And Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”— False promise of freedom from low status and agency. False promise of ability to rule and develop agency. Destruction of civlization culture, arts, knowledge, traditions. The repeat of the christian destruction of the ancient world. Through women and slaves in the old world. Through women and immigrants in the new world. If not for immigrants we would have defeated them. Democracy by 92 Intelligence differences by 99 Gender differences by 12 Group differences in 19 Science would have won. They won by the immigration act. Not by ideas. The romans were too tolerant. So are we. The only way to defeat a social superpredator is with a physical superpredator.
-
How Can a Falsehood Be Reciprocal?
Mar 19, 2020, 3:46 PM 1) So the restoration of reciprocity between the genders is what you are objecting to? 2) The equal suppression of the female means of deceit and undermining so that it equals the male suppression of deceit and undermining is irreciprocal? 3) The granting of women a separate and equal political house is irreciprocal? 4) Ending community property is irreciprocal? 5) Researching artificial wombs so that males are no longer dependent upon females for reproduction is irreciprocal? 6) What civilization is more feminine than the western, and less coercive to women and the feminine than the western? (a) historically women were almost entirely uneducated, notorious gossips, shrills, and psychotics, consider the source of all evil, and it was the victorians that works to reverse that image and elevate women. (a) women were ‘convinced’ is simply counter to the historical evidence. Women wanted the vote. (b) women were liberated by men’s industrialization. (c) women displaced men in clerical and service work (easy work). (d) women spend 70% of combined income and consume 70% of government resources, while only men over 30 are net contributors to the economy. (e) women are responsible for backing and funding and advocating every major left wing pseudoscientific movement. (f) women are responsible for the continuous voting of the left, funding the left universities. HOW CAN A FALSEHOOD BE RECIPROCAL?
-
How Can a Falsehood Be Reciprocal?
Mar 19, 2020, 3:46 PM 1) So the restoration of reciprocity between the genders is what you are objecting to? 2) The equal suppression of the female means of deceit and undermining so that it equals the male suppression of deceit and undermining is irreciprocal? 3) The granting of women a separate and equal political house is irreciprocal? 4) Ending community property is irreciprocal? 5) Researching artificial wombs so that males are no longer dependent upon females for reproduction is irreciprocal? 6) What civilization is more feminine than the western, and less coercive to women and the feminine than the western? (a) historically women were almost entirely uneducated, notorious gossips, shrills, and psychotics, consider the source of all evil, and it was the victorians that works to reverse that image and elevate women. (a) women were ‘convinced’ is simply counter to the historical evidence. Women wanted the vote. (b) women were liberated by men’s industrialization. (c) women displaced men in clerical and service work (easy work). (d) women spend 70% of combined income and consume 70% of government resources, while only men over 30 are net contributors to the economy. (e) women are responsible for backing and funding and advocating every major left wing pseudoscientific movement. (f) women are responsible for the continuous voting of the left, funding the left universities. HOW CAN A FALSEHOOD BE RECIPROCAL?
-
Creating a Non-False Pre-Packaged Product
Creating a Non-False Pre-Packaged Product https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/creating-a-non-false-pre-packaged-product/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 20:47:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266108877923389443
-
The Market For Justifying Low Agency
Mar 23, 2020, 11:54 AM THE MARKET DEMAND IS FOR “AN EXCUSE TO HAVE LOW AGENCY WHILE STILL FEELING GOOD ABOUT MYSELF AND EVEN FEELING SUPERIOR TO OTHERS”. by John Mark I’ve been pondering along these lines, don’t have full answer fleshed out yet by any means. A couple things I’m confident of:
- Asking Christians to “keep their faith private” will piss them off. Won’t work. For the reason Daniel gave. It’s a monopoly religion – “If you don’t believe, you are evil and going to hell.”
However, it’s not a monopoly religion (in America today’s version) that tries to force itself on you (there’s no “believe or we’ll kill you”), they believe conversion must happen by genuine persuasion.
If we do (continue) what Bill describes regarding keeping faith out of the courtroom, and just implement P-law (enforce reciprocity), where nothing is an excuse to violate reciprocity or bait the public into hazard, (I think) we can let Christians keep the outward expression of their faith & let them “evangelize” (they’re not winning many/any converts in the west anyway by the way) but if they cross the line into irreciprocity/baiting into hazard, they find their butts in court like anybody else. This combined with “reciprocal christianity is real christianity” could work. In limited experimentation in convos with rightwing-instinct Christians, they “get” reciprocity and fairly quickly give into my total intolerance for irreciprocity & hazard baiting. Cuz it makes sense to them & they quickly realize “my faith can’t contradict reciprocity or it’s nonsensical & harmful”.
We high agency unadulterated truth-speakers cannot compete with Christianity in terms of persuading the low-agency/intuitive/emotional crowd (spectrum chart Curt posted last couple days). My wife still attends church, she watched online service yesterday by a somewhat well known preacher – sermon addressing coronavirus situation using bible verses & “God told me” type stuff. It was masterful. Mix of stoicism (fine) with bible verses loosely interpreted (classic trick) and supernatural claims, humor injected, total alpha vibe “I’m not afraid, I’m full of joy”. Messages:
“God will protect you.” “You don’t have to be afraid.” “We Christians are the only ones full of joy and not afraid during this time.” (Effective out-grouping of anyone attempting to think rationally and act with agency during the crisis. Excuse for lack of agency presented as a positive.) “The Bible foretold this” (quotes a Bible prophecy about pestilence/plague and people being afraid.) “God is accomplishing a purpose through this – He is purifying His church” (provides meaning -answers “why is this happening?”). (Common tactic – anything bad that happens is presented as punishment/correction for bad people.) Again, this provides excuse for low agency and encourages it – why fight God’s will? This stuff is like crack for the low agency. I talked to my wife about it and she admitted I was right. She is pretty high-agency for a woman and high IQ and ultra right wing, understands baiting into hazard but I can tell it is still like removing an addiction. Imagine what it is like for a lower-agency person,medium-low IQ to hear us talk. For comparison, our message, the unadulterated truth:
- No one is going to help you except you, and your immediate family, and our fellow grassroots rightwingers.(Did God save millions of christians in soviet russia from being killed by the commies? No. So what guarantee do we have that He’ll help us?)
The only reason this is happening is that there are too many crappy people in the world (e.g. chinese peasant wet markets, chinese govt face-before-truth liars, and/or elite scumbags), and we have not sufficiently separated from and/or eliminated them.
The only meaning this event has is as a wake up call to the consequences of not doing that.
It is our responsibility to fix this.
Notice that every one of our points demands high agency. Which they are either incapable of, or need a lot of training for. If given a free market choice, they will choose the “excuse for low agency” message every time over ours. And this is the problem I don’t know how to solve: How to lead such people without lying to them, and/or provide them a religion/mindfulness that does not lie to them. Because what they demand is lies – which are their excuse for low agency. Removing the lies removes the very reason they are attracted to the religion in the first place. (There are exceptions, high-agency Christians exist and for them Christianity operates as just a pre-packaged “defense container” for conservative instincts – but most Christians their religion is also an excuse for low agency.) Maybe it is possible to provide a lie-free mindfulness “religion” or version of Christianity that promotes agency rather than reducing it, but who will buy it? The actual market demand is for “an excuse to have low agency while still feeling good about myself and even feeling superior to others”. Edit
-
The Market For Justifying Low Agency
Mar 23, 2020, 11:54 AM THE MARKET DEMAND IS FOR “AN EXCUSE TO HAVE LOW AGENCY WHILE STILL FEELING GOOD ABOUT MYSELF AND EVEN FEELING SUPERIOR TO OTHERS”. by John Mark I’ve been pondering along these lines, don’t have full answer fleshed out yet by any means. A couple things I’m confident of:
- Asking Christians to “keep their faith private” will piss them off. Won’t work. For the reason Daniel gave. It’s a monopoly religion – “If you don’t believe, you are evil and going to hell.”
However, it’s not a monopoly religion (in America today’s version) that tries to force itself on you (there’s no “believe or we’ll kill you”), they believe conversion must happen by genuine persuasion.
If we do (continue) what Bill describes regarding keeping faith out of the courtroom, and just implement P-law (enforce reciprocity), where nothing is an excuse to violate reciprocity or bait the public into hazard, (I think) we can let Christians keep the outward expression of their faith & let them “evangelize” (they’re not winning many/any converts in the west anyway by the way) but if they cross the line into irreciprocity/baiting into hazard, they find their butts in court like anybody else. This combined with “reciprocal christianity is real christianity” could work. In limited experimentation in convos with rightwing-instinct Christians, they “get” reciprocity and fairly quickly give into my total intolerance for irreciprocity & hazard baiting. Cuz it makes sense to them & they quickly realize “my faith can’t contradict reciprocity or it’s nonsensical & harmful”.
We high agency unadulterated truth-speakers cannot compete with Christianity in terms of persuading the low-agency/intuitive/emotional crowd (spectrum chart Curt posted last couple days). My wife still attends church, she watched online service yesterday by a somewhat well known preacher – sermon addressing coronavirus situation using bible verses & “God told me” type stuff. It was masterful. Mix of stoicism (fine) with bible verses loosely interpreted (classic trick) and supernatural claims, humor injected, total alpha vibe “I’m not afraid, I’m full of joy”. Messages:
“God will protect you.” “You don’t have to be afraid.” “We Christians are the only ones full of joy and not afraid during this time.” (Effective out-grouping of anyone attempting to think rationally and act with agency during the crisis. Excuse for lack of agency presented as a positive.) “The Bible foretold this” (quotes a Bible prophecy about pestilence/plague and people being afraid.) “God is accomplishing a purpose through this – He is purifying His church” (provides meaning -answers “why is this happening?”). (Common tactic – anything bad that happens is presented as punishment/correction for bad people.) Again, this provides excuse for low agency and encourages it – why fight God’s will? This stuff is like crack for the low agency. I talked to my wife about it and she admitted I was right. She is pretty high-agency for a woman and high IQ and ultra right wing, understands baiting into hazard but I can tell it is still like removing an addiction. Imagine what it is like for a lower-agency person,medium-low IQ to hear us talk. For comparison, our message, the unadulterated truth:
- No one is going to help you except you, and your immediate family, and our fellow grassroots rightwingers.(Did God save millions of christians in soviet russia from being killed by the commies? No. So what guarantee do we have that He’ll help us?)
The only reason this is happening is that there are too many crappy people in the world (e.g. chinese peasant wet markets, chinese govt face-before-truth liars, and/or elite scumbags), and we have not sufficiently separated from and/or eliminated them.
The only meaning this event has is as a wake up call to the consequences of not doing that.
It is our responsibility to fix this.
Notice that every one of our points demands high agency. Which they are either incapable of, or need a lot of training for. If given a free market choice, they will choose the “excuse for low agency” message every time over ours. And this is the problem I don’t know how to solve: How to lead such people without lying to them, and/or provide them a religion/mindfulness that does not lie to them. Because what they demand is lies – which are their excuse for low agency. Removing the lies removes the very reason they are attracted to the religion in the first place. (There are exceptions, high-agency Christians exist and for them Christianity operates as just a pre-packaged “defense container” for conservative instincts – but most Christians their religion is also an excuse for low agency.) Maybe it is possible to provide a lie-free mindfulness “religion” or version of Christianity that promotes agency rather than reducing it, but who will buy it? The actual market demand is for “an excuse to have low agency while still feeling good about myself and even feeling superior to others”. Edit
