Feb 28, 2020, 8:09 PM To: Kimberly Kay Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud. There is no comparison to the abrahamic dark age, the christian destruction of the arts, letters, knowledge, schools, government, and religion of the roman world; the BILLION DEAD from the islamic destruction of the north african, Egyptian, levantine, Persian, north west indian, byzantine, and balkan civilizations and their reduction to dysgenia, poverty, and ashes; or the Marxist, Bolshevik, holocaust against the russian, and ukrainian peoples, and the millions of eastern europeans who suffered under the bolsheviks including the russians whose development was set back a hundred years or more? So far the Marxist-Communist-Socialist-Postmodernist program has cost 100 Million lives at least. How many more will be lost trying to achieve in europe and america what the russians achieved at huge cost they may never recover from, and the germans achieved at cost of being all but destroyed? Why didn’t china have a problem until marx? Why did india avoid the problem? Why is western civlization experiencing the problem? Why are some ideas – false promises – so insidious that they are worse than drugs? Why are women and underclasses in particular so suggestible and easy to bait into false promise? Why do we tolerate that set of lies which is more murderous than all but the great plagues? And is constructed of lies by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary law? These are the big questions of our age. BTW: calling people nazis for arguing that some group of religions fosters undermining because of their cultural dogma and training is just evidence of the correctness of doolittle’s criticism. Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.
Theme: Deception
-
Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Female Cognitive Warfare
Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Female Cognitive Warfare Expression https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/heaping-of-undue-praise-all-left-political-behavior-is-female-cognitive-warfare-expression/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:36:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266483501576130560
-
Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Female Cognitive Warfare Expression
Mar 2, 2020, 9:55 AM Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Female Cognitive Warfare Expression
—“Heaping of undue praise, or “Praise Bombing“. Praise (love) bombing is baiting into hazard. The goal is for the target to lower their defenses. Manipulation and Betrayal only work if trust is first established.”– Andrew M Gilmour
Again, the female strategy: heaping of undue praise is how women encourage children to continue in the face of failure and adversity. That’s the positive. In the negative, it’s heaping undue praise on that which is undeserving of it, in order to undermine that which is deserving of it. in other words, the female intuition applied to the negative.
-
Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Female Cognitive Warfare Expression
Mar 2, 2020, 9:55 AM Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Female Cognitive Warfare Expression
—“Heaping of undue praise, or “Praise Bombing“. Praise (love) bombing is baiting into hazard. The goal is for the target to lower their defenses. Manipulation and Betrayal only work if trust is first established.”– Andrew M Gilmour
Again, the female strategy: heaping of undue praise is how women encourage children to continue in the face of failure and adversity. That’s the positive. In the negative, it’s heaping undue praise on that which is undeserving of it, in order to undermine that which is deserving of it. in other words, the female intuition applied to the negative.
-
“Hou’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”
“Hou’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/houre-confusing-anti-semitism-genetics-with-anti-abrahamism-argument/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:27:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266481308361986051
-
“Hou’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”
Mar 2, 2020, 1:20 PM You’re confusing anti-semitism (genetics) with anti-abrahamism (the method of creating and propagating social construction that baits into hazard) and was used to create rabbinical judaism, christianity, islam, and marxism, postmodernism, and feminism. And your making the presumption that we think anyone has any agency over their moral bias, group strategy and means of advocating and pursuing it. We don’t make that mistake. Our position is just the opposite: harmony is achievable by preventing the use of pseudoscience and sophistry to bait people into hazard in matters of the commons, and to end monopoly government so that as we did in Europe, we can separate into groups that produce the normative and social and economic commons desirable by groups, each of whom, thanks to the european system of thought, and the scientific and industrial revolution, has the luxury of pursuing polities and commons best suited to their genetic and cultural preferences. But to federally govern such polities, we must have rule of law that is decidable across polities in matters material (property). That is the propertarian project. To product a constitution of natural law limiting the federal government to its original intent – continental defense and resolution of property conflicts between independent traditional european states. While at the same time allowing the evolution of various states with different and competing interests to serve interests of groups with different interests and needs. When all we are trying to do is solve the great political question of the 21st century. .The point is, that when the population gets to the point of civil war, we will have a solution ready to resolve the crisis. And it’s all online. Now. We work on it publicly.
-
“Hou’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”
Mar 2, 2020, 1:20 PM You’re confusing anti-semitism (genetics) with anti-abrahamism (the method of creating and propagating social construction that baits into hazard) and was used to create rabbinical judaism, christianity, islam, and marxism, postmodernism, and feminism. And your making the presumption that we think anyone has any agency over their moral bias, group strategy and means of advocating and pursuing it. We don’t make that mistake. Our position is just the opposite: harmony is achievable by preventing the use of pseudoscience and sophistry to bait people into hazard in matters of the commons, and to end monopoly government so that as we did in Europe, we can separate into groups that produce the normative and social and economic commons desirable by groups, each of whom, thanks to the european system of thought, and the scientific and industrial revolution, has the luxury of pursuing polities and commons best suited to their genetic and cultural preferences. But to federally govern such polities, we must have rule of law that is decidable across polities in matters material (property). That is the propertarian project. To product a constitution of natural law limiting the federal government to its original intent – continental defense and resolution of property conflicts between independent traditional european states. While at the same time allowing the evolution of various states with different and competing interests to serve interests of groups with different interests and needs. When all we are trying to do is solve the great political question of the 21st century. .The point is, that when the population gets to the point of civil war, we will have a solution ready to resolve the crisis. And it’s all online. Now. We work on it publicly.
-
Everyone knows the truth. Just say it.
Mar 5, 2020, 5:28 PM
—“I meant civilized in the sense that they can adopt P there. In fact you can’t, the lie about the state of their economy, and pretty much everything they make is not fully warrantied.”–
Um. P is possible as long as you tell the truth. The Chinese people say all the time that the government legitimizes itself by presuming the people are childlike. The people have no problem with the government’s policies, and like russians will go along with them – its that they don’t like being lied to. Same advice I have for russians. Everyone knows the truth. Just say it.
-
Everyone knows the truth. Just say it.
Mar 5, 2020, 5:28 PM
—“I meant civilized in the sense that they can adopt P there. In fact you can’t, the lie about the state of their economy, and pretty much everything they make is not fully warrantied.”–
Um. P is possible as long as you tell the truth. The Chinese people say all the time that the government legitimizes itself by presuming the people are childlike. The people have no problem with the government’s policies, and like russians will go along with them – its that they don’t like being lied to. Same advice I have for russians. Everyone knows the truth. Just say it.
-
Ouch. Another Discovery: Facelessness
Ouch. Another Discovery: Facelessness https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/ouch-another-discovery-facelessness/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 12:48:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266350812453888002