Love you man but I understand motivated reasoning. So I’m going to go with my terribly good history of prediction of long term outcomes on this. There are other alternatives, (like regulating it as a savings vehicle) but to say the state can’t kill it off is positively false.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 20:46:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453825599563345921
Reply addressees: @ThorkilVaerge
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453825203625209862
CRITICAL RACE THEORY IS JUST THE PRESENT APPLICATION OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF REBELLION BY THE FEMININE MIDDLE EAST AGAINST THE MASCULINE INDO EUROPEANS.
No matter how we describe it or how we name it:
1) “The female method of anti-social behavior, converted to a means of anti-social wafare”,
2) “The Revolutionary Spirit”,
3) Communism, Leninism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Anti-Male feminism, PC-Woke, Critical Race Theory.
These are all the single technique of rallying the margins to destroy cooperation between sexes, classes, ethnicities, and races, by the false promise that “after indo europeans”, “after rome”, or “after white men”, we can violate the laws of the universe:
1) the formal sciences (logic),
2) the physical sciences (scarcity),
3) the behavioral sciences (acquisition, cooperation, division of labor, by sovereignty in demonstrated interestsa and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality)
4) the evolutionary sciences (sex, class, ethnicity, and race differeinces. mutational load is almost always negative, and drifts downward into the lower classes. natural selection by sortition and control of reproduction is necessary to prevent regression to the mean. Markets by internal forces are the substitute for natural selection by external forces. we must always defeat the red queen, and we have a narrow time frame in which to do so before this hostile climate, geology, solar system, and galacy visit upon us another extinction event.
It’s a beautiful lie. A desirable lie. It allows the enemies of our people our civlization and human evolution to blame us for the laws of nature, when it is our discovery, adaptation to, application of, and evolution by those laws of nature that allows those of ‘infantilized mind’ to have the privilge to undermine rather than disappear into ashes and dust.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 14:31:42 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107179638942061536
@Sargonofakkad100 Correct. No matter how we describe it or how we name it: “The female method of anti-social behavior, converted to a means of anti-social wafare”, “The Revolutionary Spirit”, Communism, Leninism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Anti-Male feminism, PC-Woke, Critical Race Theory. These are all the single technique of rallying the margins to destroy cooperation between sexes, classes, ethnicities, and races, by the false promise that “after indo europeans”, “after rome”, or “after white men”, we can violate the laws of the universe: 1) the formal sciences (logic), 2) the physical sciences (scarcity), 3) the behavioral sciences (acquisition, cooperation, division of labor, by sovereignty in demonstrated interestsa and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality) 4) the evolutionary sciences (sex, class, ethnicity, and race differeinces. mutational load is almost always negative, and drifts downward into the lower classes. natural selection by sortition and control of reproduction is necessary to prevent regression to the mean. Markets by internal forces are the substitute for natural selection by external forces. we must always defeat the red queen, and we have a narrow time frame in which to do so before this hostile climate, geology, solar system, and galacy visit upon us another extinction event..
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 14:29:04 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107179628621912181
P-COGNITIVE FILTERING
by Brandon Hayes
We focus on removing ignorance, error, bias, & deceit. This is a filtering process not a process of agreement, association, nor approval.
This is a difficult shift for most. As disagreement, disassociation, & disapproval provides reasonable virtue signals.
Shifting from good/bad, right/wrong, & approval/disapproval to true/false, decidable/undecidable, & reciprocal/irreciprocal [innocent/guilty] affords the removal of error in judgement as such.
Most say don’t judge; they say so cause their judgment criteria provides poor results.
Most use good/bad [association] when they believe you biased; approval/disapproval [approval] when they believe you ignorant; right/wrong [agreement] when they believe you in error. All of which are errors in judgment.
We don’t look for non-judgment but proper judgment. No conflict avoidance; only settlement (resolution). Not judging doesn’t make one kind but merely demonstrates them as incapable of judgment. This shift in frame forces participation or illuminates the inability to participate.
So, to come back around: you asked Dr. Brad if thought the audience would understand some explanation; his response was he couldn’t tell because the advancement gifted to him in cognitive filtering can’t be overwritten.
Most use good/bad [association] when they believe you biased; approval/disapproval [approval] when they believe you ignorant; right/wrong [agreement] when they believe you in error. All of which are errors in judgment.
He basically said: “I don’t know if it’s because it’s understandable or because I understand you now.”
Which even if no one else could understand (not the case) it’d still be profound because it’s a demonstrable leap in cognition after working with someone for merely months.
P is a cooperative, cognitive, & instrumental leap in adaptability: it provides the entirety of an evolutionary step-function. Affording for the increased precision in conflict resolution by constraining negotiation to value-neutral propositions.
Affording resolutions of disputes to be ultimately decidable (by including undecidability) removes conflict-avoidance and thusly the storage of violent debts (retaliatory cycles).
Education(indoctrination) of the past required memorization; abstract routinization which is path-dependent due to the disconcordance with reality as such. Where proper disambiguation & serialization only strengthens one’s ties to worldly phenomena deepening understanding.
Tackling the taboos conditions people against biased responses; reducing all claims to first principles removes ignorance; building from those principles, faithfully, avoids error.
We can gift entire polities the equivalent of an SD in IQ.
Truth doesn’t suffer deceit.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 00:10:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107176252144773857
RT @ThruTheHayes: Most use good/bad [association] when they believe you biased; approval/disapproval [approval] when they believe you ignor…
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-27 20:07:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453453339786629126
RT @ThruTheHayes: COGNITIVE FILTERING
We focus of removing ignorance, error, bias, & deceit. This is a filtering process not a process of…
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-27 20:07:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453453291900260361
Not at all. I’m saying you can’t testify to that which you can’t in fact testify to. Which is why you need to lie and why the Abrahamic method of deceit is necessary for you to defend your superstition, instead of just saying “I have faith” thereby demonstrating that you don’t.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-27 16:55:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453405077549600772
Reply addressees: @Evangelium18 @pontifex_mxms @NewClothesForMe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453404585150881801
I do truth. I don’t need comforting lies. It comes with courage, character, and intelligence. You should try it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-27 16:46:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453402714847776768
Reply addressees: @Evangelium18 @pontifex_mxms @NewClothesForMe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453401647934226432
I am not an atheist. I just separate the words of Jesus (if he existed) from the lies that generation cumulatively added, and the evil god of the semites in the old testament.
European gods are far better. Jesus filled a hole in our natural religion and philosophy: love.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-27 16:38:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453400652982390794
Reply addressees: @pontifex_mxms @Evangelium18 @NewClothesForMe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453400035375284230
I would instead, call christians, jews. Because the Jefferson bible, is all that Jesus (if he existed) ever said. The rest is made up nonsense and lies. With Nicea the first great crime against Chrisitianity.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-27 14:54:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453374438465052677
Reply addressees: @NewClothesForMe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453372433247866880