P-COGNITIVE FILTERING by Brandon Hayes We focus on removing ignorance, error, bi

P-COGNITIVE FILTERING
by Brandon Hayes

We focus on removing ignorance, error, bias, & deceit. This is a filtering process not a process of agreement, association, nor approval.

This is a difficult shift for most. As disagreement, disassociation, & disapproval provides reasonable virtue signals.

Shifting from good/bad, right/wrong, & approval/disapproval to true/false, decidable/undecidable, & reciprocal/irreciprocal [innocent/guilty] affords the removal of error in judgement as such.

Most say don’t judge; they say so cause their judgment criteria provides poor results.

Most use good/bad [association] when they believe you biased; approval/disapproval [approval] when they believe you ignorant; right/wrong [agreement] when they believe you in error. All of which are errors in judgment.

We don’t look for non-judgment but proper judgment. No conflict avoidance; only settlement (resolution). Not judging doesn’t make one kind but merely demonstrates them as incapable of judgment. This shift in frame forces participation or illuminates the inability to participate.

So, to come back around: you asked Dr. Brad if thought the audience would understand some explanation; his response was he couldn’t tell because the advancement gifted to him in cognitive filtering can’t be overwritten.

Most use good/bad [association] when they believe you biased; approval/disapproval [approval] when they believe you ignorant; right/wrong [agreement] when they believe you in error. All of which are errors in judgment.

He basically said: “I don’t know if it’s because it’s understandable or because I understand you now.”

Which even if no one else could understand (not the case) it’d still be profound because it’s a demonstrable leap in cognition after working with someone for merely months.

P is a cooperative, cognitive, & instrumental leap in adaptability: it provides the entirety of an evolutionary step-function. Affording for the increased precision in conflict resolution by constraining negotiation to value-neutral propositions.

Affording resolutions of disputes to be ultimately decidable (by including undecidability) removes conflict-avoidance and thusly the storage of violent debts (retaliatory cycles).

Education(indoctrination) of the past required memorization; abstract routinization which is path-dependent due to the disconcordance with reality as such. Where proper disambiguation & serialization only strengthens one’s ties to worldly phenomena deepening understanding.

Tackling the taboos conditions people against biased responses; reducing all claims to first principles removes ignorance; building from those principles, faithfully, avoids error.

We can gift entire polities the equivalent of an SD in IQ.

Truth doesn’t suffer deceit.