No. That’s professional analysis of a technique he as had written down, published, practiced, with extraordinary success for decades. You can deny it but that’s just lying by denying from a position of ignorance.
Very kindergarten or toddler really.
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 22:39:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014105640264777844
TRUMPIAN REALITY VS WELL INTENTIONED NAIVETY
Do you think the Russians negotiate in good faith? The Chinese? Even the Europeans? I mean, I study this nonsense for a living. When the moral high ground fails, and it has with all three, then you are forced into pragmatism. And that’s what Trump is doing. He’s applying the “Art of the Deal” ( a book he wrote about his method years ago) to world politics and it turns out to be extremely effective.
IMO you are making a common mistake which is to extend your moral compass beyond the scale of it’s applicability. Our previous ‘moral’ presidents failed. They spent over thirty years failing. Trump is achieving in months what they failed at for decades. And he has little choice.
It’s normal behavior for people like you with limited world experience, just as it’s normal for young women to expect social behavior at political and economic scale.
For those of us who have run companies around the world, dealt with corruption around the world, dealt with cultural differences around the world, dealt with courts around the world, and in my case, worked in both business, Justice and Intelligence, then you are deprived of the moral naivety of the average and below average American.
Some of us have to be adults.
Partly because we know how to.
Partly because we can.
And partly because we have to compensate for a vast number of ‘well meaning fools’ like yourself.
I could call your opinion a luxury of first world innocence. Or I could call it naivety, or I could call it ignorance, or I could frame it with less kind accusations.
But you’re clearly a good person.
You’re just wrong to think your intuitions scale.
The don’t.
Cheers
CD
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 22:23:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014101604425933255
WHY YOU REALLY DISAPPROVE OF TRUMP?
Personally, what I think y’all disapprove of, is that it’s clear Trump doesn’t respect the center left to left to extreme left, and he uses your tactics against you.
You have no arguments except the usual “gossiping shaming ridiculing rallying psychologizing moralizing” which are the feminine tactics that substitute for argument.
In fact the rise of the entire right wing internet culture in 2016 was the abandonment of traditional conservative rhetorical ethics (masculine) and the adoption of leftist tactics of reputation destruction (feminine).
I mean, it’s pretty obvious.
Attached is my reduction of feminine > abrahamic > marxist > left tactics. Whereas the right’s version is what we call fictionalisms (occult, sophistry, pseudoscience.) Both strategies are expressions of sex differences in sensation, perception, valience, and expression: feminine empathizing and social-emotional undermining, male systematizing and cognitive-rational undermining.
(And yes, I am the world expert in these ridiculous things. No one developed the science of lying before. I did it by accident because I needed to improve the Law. And it was disheartening. We live in a sea of lies.)
And the tactics of the feminine > abrahamic > marxist > postmodern > woke sequence:
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 19:45:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014061802540376152
What? I’m a critic of all of those sources and most conspiracy theory. Why do you think the whacky hard right has attacked me for years? ??? lol.
I didn’t get banned from facebook by the left, but because the american nazis ran a campaign against me by miscasting a series of my posts.
The Russian government banned me from Russian Social media platform VK because I ran a think tank in Ukraine and was exposing the nonsense coming out of their propaganda factory in St Petersburg.
I’ve had the FBI meet with me regularly: because they’ve misinterpreted a post, some crazy right winger quoted me, or they think I have insight into crazies.
Are you nuts? lol
I know the IQ problem and bias amplifier is rampant but I mean, what? Seriously…
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-15 22:16:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2011925577830449329
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-15 16:20:45 UTC
Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/2011835958334030291
Lie Techniques: Gish Gallop vs Rolling Accusations vs Moving the Goal Post. (Evasions)
Gish Gallop (Overloading)
A rhetorical (and often fallacious) debate technique where someone overwhelms their opponent by rapidly firing off a large number of arguments, claims, assertions, half-truths, misrepresentations, or outright falsehoods in quick succession — without regard for their quality, accuracy, relevance, or strength.
The goal is not to build a coherent case but to create so much volume and confusion that the opponent cannot realistically address or refute every point within the available time (especially in timed debates, live discussions, or fast-paced formats like interviews or social media exchanges).
Rolling Accusations (Positiva)
A lie/deflection technique where someone or some group fires off a sequence of (often unrelated or escalating) accusations as each if falsified. Primarily used by Media and DNC. “The Gated Institutional Narrative”.
Moving the Goalposts (Negativa)
A lie/evasion technique where, after you meet their stated demand or provide evidence, they quietly change (or raise) the requirements — demanding more proof, stricter standards, or a new condition — to avoid admitting defeat and keep claiming you haven’t satisfied them.
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-12 17:45:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2010770053193683022
FASCINATING EXAMPLE OF PROJECTION AND SUBJECTIVITY OF PERCEPTION
This discourse is the best example, far better than during George Floyd, of the human tendency to project bias into perception of events. And to bend events to reinforce their biases.
I do this kind of assessment for a living so to speak, and use social media to perform textual analysis of differences of perception and valence to understand the motives, bias, reaction, projection, and reasoning of the populations – with special emphasis on sex, class, and cultural differences.
In almost every case the difference is sex-biased: meaning feminine prey (fear) response and masculine predator (confidence) response – although as we have seen in this thread, there are overlaps that include feminine empathic males, and masculine systemic rational females. And there is a definite class effect with the lower classes biasing to the feminine (victim, prey, progressive) response and the upper middle and upper biasing toward the masculine (actor, predator, conservative).
These distributions are expected and universal though they vary by culture and that culture’s biases toward responsibility.
But this is the best example I’ve seen of provoking stereotypical bias projection.
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-12 13:49:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2010710671370207481
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-12 01:34:26 UTC
Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/2010525748134887513
Great Question.
While (a) all conspiracy theories hold a grain of truth at their core and (b) there is a tendency on the right to seek conspiracy narratives just as the left has a tendency toward oppression narratives, the reality is that the city of london does specialize in shady money, but that they’re closely intertwined with our NYC only slightly less questionable money.
While I get why folks latch onto these City of London empire theories—there’s no denying London’s massive role in global finance, handling 40% of forex and offshore havens that tie into US trends like deindustrialization—it’s mostly overblown conspiracy thinking.
What we should think in terms of is the US-UK transfer of imperial power and the UK’s retention of some aspects of that history combined with some aspects of american postwar capture of the UK financial system in order to expand american postwar power.
But in the end it’s rational incentives (‘conspiracy of common interests’) not conspiracy by intent.
Financialization in America ramped up through our own choices, like deregulation in the ’80s and chasing short-term profits, which yeah, led to predictable downsides like inequality and job losses in manufacturing, but also powered our dominance in world trade and military might. The USA switched from military to economic power especially under Regan. Which we see playing out with Trump’s continuation of exercising that power today.
Instead of chasing plots, let’s stick to facts: incentives drive this stuff, not some British overlord suppressing sovereignty.
OTOH: anything that gets the radical right to agitprop is probably a counter-balance to the radical left and in some strange way produces a reasonable equilibrium.
Short answer, no conspiracy other than common interest made possible by the utility of our shared anglo american common law emphasis on the protection of private property, the profitability of globalism for the financial sector, and the utility of using that wealth as strategic leverage instead of blood and steel.
I hope this provides the answer you’re looking for. I try to remain sympathetic to conservatives without feeding the false narratives.
CD
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-02 06:06:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2006970421980299501
As I have said, as far as I know I’m the existing expert on the sex differences in perception cognition and speech – particularly in deception – and I recognize that the ashkenazim are employing the female means of sedition. The question is whether like women it’s genetic (neurological) or cultural or both. I assume it’s both since it doesn’t dissipate with outbreeding.
Regardless, I do not see the world lacking women, nor the absence of the feminine cognition in other populations.
I just want to know what to do about their sedition in an era where we have hyper-regulated male anti-social and anti-political behavior but enabled and encoursaged the female versions of it.
The present civilizational crisis is the result of the combination of the introgression of jewish thought combined with the introgression of women into the franchise and the economy.
It’s simple really.
The question is what do we do to accomodate evolutionary differences that may be almost impossible to regulate?
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-02 01:02:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2006893953669611863