Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Everything, literally everything the church claims, just as they converted natur

    Everything, literally everything the church claims, just as they converted natural law to divine law, and greek ethics to christian ethics, is just an authoritarian supernatural retread to appeal to the ignorant and petty underclasses who could not obtain status by merit in aristocratic european civ. The church destroyed the schools, the philosophers, their writings, the arts, and the monuments of europe, just as today’s leftists destroy education, history, law. There is no difference. The weaponization of the weak and unable and cowardly – and IRRESPONSIBLe, against the strong, and able, and brave – and RESPONSIBLE. The abrahamic religions are a cancer of ignorance. Had stoicism and one of the movements akin to Sol Invictus (which jesus is a copy of) survived, the west might never have had a dark age, and might have hit the industrial revolution by the time of the muslim conquests that destroyed the trade of the old world.

    Reply addressees: @ProductionMan @MikeChardin

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-24 18:30:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904239430250151936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904233074382233606

  • We are so suppressed on this platform that it’s hardly worth the effort I put in

    We are so suppressed on this platform that it’s hardly worth the effort I put into it. Unfortunately, as a news source, and with grok as a service, it’s still worth it.

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-20 18:18:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1902786746309656630

  • RT @Father_Speaking: @curtdoolittle You can summarise it to “Our technology stop

    RT @Father_Speaking: @curtdoolittle You can summarise it to “Our technology stops the lying, stops the fighting and stops wasting time.”

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-20 01:35:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1902534373888684282

  • RT @mattwridley: 5 years ago today @NatureMedicine published the proximal origin

    RT @mattwridley: 5 years ago today @NatureMedicine published the proximal origin paper which misled me and many others into thinking a lab…

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-18 03:09:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1901833390980276260

  • That not how criticism woks. You are trying to justify argument from your ignora

    That not how criticism woks. You are trying to justify argument from your ignorance. Its a category of lying using pretense of knowledge in which you do not demonstrate competency sufficient to levy criticism, and instead rely on feminine personal criticism to cover for your ignorance. Its a cognitively feminine means of self preservation of self image and imagined status akin to the feminine resistance to self auditing and adapting to preserve dependence upon impulse and intuition.

    Sorry but you are unequipped for this discourse.

    Reply addressees: @redemotivator

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-15 01:10:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1900716275053322240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1900710098311451019

  • EXPLAINING THE FEMININE BEHAVIOR OF THE LEFT AS CRIMINAL The left, as we have se

    EXPLAINING THE FEMININE BEHAVIOR OF THE LEFT AS CRIMINAL
    The left, as we have seen worldwide, continues to converge on the female strategy and means of argument persuasion influence and deception. It is a form of luxury belief justifying unearned hyperconsumption. We see this where women if possible will migrate to feminine careers and men the opposite. This divergence will manifest anywhere that the traditional economic divergence between the sexes is ameliorated. This is what we’re going through at the moment. Every time we add a class to the franchise we experience disruption as the class added must adopt the responsibilities their new agency demands. There is an adaptive lag in our cultures, institutions and laws. While all previous class advancement have dominated by the masculine emergence (Middle-enlightenment, lower-marxist), the recent is the opposite: feminine and the radically higher resistance to responsibility in the cognitively feminine. At present we have failed to suppress the feminine means of antisocial, anti-economic, anti-political, and anti-geostrategic, and those means driven by those traits, destructive at scale, based on four falsehoods (denials) of the left (scarcity, self interest, natural selection, evidentiary truth), of the four sciences (physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and formal). All of which are evasions of responsibility for the self, private, and common. So we will reform our laws and our policies now that the feminine has failed, just as the working class failed. Because the secret to the west is the institutionalization over five thousand years, or responsibility (duty) of insurance of individual sovereignty in one’s demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, and truth before face, regardless of cost, and heroism by truth excellence and beauty(contribution to the commons) in all that one is capable of.

    All those values are responsibilities inimical to the cognitively feminine (infantilized) regardless of sex.

    The left is driven by envy, irresponsibility, and evasion of work and risk. Because that’s what women with children must do as hunter gatherers.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @alan2102z @uberboyo

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-14 21:18:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1900657902475526144

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1900652768529883244

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: Labels define the entire existence of the left. Not attribute

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: Labels define the entire existence of the left.

    Not attributes.
    Not characteristics.
    Not reality.

    Just labels.

    If it…

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-14 19:41:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1900633415856386106

  • West: High Trust, Truth Before Face: Be a Hero. Middle East: Facelessness: lying

    West: High Trust, Truth Before Face: Be a Hero.
    Middle East: Facelessness: lying is virtuous on behalf of family or tribe: Seize the opportunity before others do vs. Don’t be a sucker.
    East: Face Before Truth: Be Harmonious.
    Africa: Truth Blindness: The Way of Four Families. Seize the opportunity before others do, and ignore the consequences.

    Reminder via @bryanbrey

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-13 16:05:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1900216718762676224

  • THEY MAKE STUFF UP, LIE, CHEAT, AND STEAL? Leftists like women, ‘make stuff up’

    THEY MAKE STUFF UP, LIE, CHEAT, AND STEAL?
    Leftists like women, ‘make stuff up’ with magical thinking and emotional loading seeking attention by dramatical effect. Conservatives, like men, state the facts as they see them, and use hyperbolic exaggeration to gain attention and inspire emotional loading.

    The weird thing we’re realizing, is that conservatives, even the wacky ones, are right more often than not, and the leftists are wrong even when we intuit that they might be right.

    This is both a confusing and fascinating era for social and behavioral science – if you’re a conservative. Because the leftists are almost universally wrong about almost everything.

    It’s as though (as I’ve said many times before) the world went sideways between the progressives and the. marxists and the western intellectual tradition failed by the end of the 1920s. With the few exceptions in tech lingering on, despite the total eventual collapse of western evidentiary, realist, naturalist, materialist thought and the subsequent feminine takeover and destruction of the academy fist, education section, family third, and society last.

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-10 15:44:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1899124132241141760

  • Q: CURT –“would you debate @paleochristcon Andrew Wilson?” I would have a discu

    Q: CURT –“would you debate @paleochristcon Andrew Wilson?”

    I would have a discussion to seek to undersetand. I tend not to enter into debates because they are predominantly intellectually dishonest.
    Even then, I dunno what I would debate him about. I mean, I’m arguing the science of decidability. He’s making moral argument. I kind of doubt I’d disagree with him on much. If there was a disagreement, it would be over a pragmatism of either of our approaches. My view of course is that a christian is the best religion for those who need religion, and since it is consistent with natural law, and the constitution a document of natural law. And that I’m not in favor of immigration or expansion of any other religions at all – because they’re almost all (otehr than buddhism) hostile to christianity.
    So then It’s just a matter of whether you see yourself as a ‘priestly’ man of the people that helps choose, or a ‘jurist’ for the people that must decide. Otherwise I suspect I would just agree with him.
    FWIW: It’s fundamentalism that states theological claims are materially ‘true’ rather than metaphorically ‘wise and just’ I have a problem with. Even then I don’t care as long as it doesn’t interfere with the law.
    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @ScottClaremonty @paleochristcon

    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-09 18:08:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898798119774715904

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898704579694641329