OUR TOP SCHOOLS DO NOT TEACH LAW BUT SEDITION
When I was in college in Connecticut in the late 70s we could take certain courses across the network, and lectures at Yale were frequently worth the 45 minutes to an hour of travel time – especially if brick oven pizza was involved. We also used Trinity – mostly for movies. Wesleyan for art shows, but little else. And I won’t mention Connecticut College. 😉

My research on reform required I spend a little too much time with the curriculum of the top law schools in the USA, and I came away rather horrified – we don’t practice the intent of the University as the church intended, which was to produce people capable of sharing the aristocracy and nobility’s burden of public health (Physicians), morality (Theology), and behavior (Law).

We do not teach the natural law as a science of cooperation of large numbers of increasingly anonymous and varied people at scales that are individually incomprehensible.

We do not teach that that our institutions are empirical not political: that sovereignty and equality under the law are produced by our universal reciprocal insurance of individual one another’s sovereignty, and that we are the only people who are truly sovereign because of it;

And that the common law, the purely empirical, adversarially discovered within and across regions under the applied natural law of sovereignty; that the determination of collective action by concurrency we call democracy is empirical measurement of consensus prior to issuance of legislative contract between parties;

And that mankind will never end our innovation in cooperation – but likewise never end our innovation in free riding, rent seeking, parasitism, and predation.

And that all human organizations as they scale suppress local deceptions, rents, parasitisms and predations to pay for central suppressions of them; while gradually producing the same incentives among those whose job it is to suppress them.

And that the anonymity of those who, seeking exit from those market forces in the safety of bureaucracy, do deterministically by their power distance, serve their and their common interests first, and exhaust the surpluses of the vast edifice of civilizational cooperation through endless justification, differing only from murderers, rapists, thieves, conspirators, both private and public that they have so gently but systematically replaced.

Civilizations die for the same reason: the overproduction of rentiers whose soft and distant corruption in vast numbers by ways small and large destroy the trust that was necessary for the trust producing investment and risk by millions in thousands of subtleties every day until the calcification is sufficient that the polity cannot respond to gradual change of immanent shock.

Instead, under the marxist sequence’s imitation of the abrahamic sequence, itself an imitation of the feminine sequence of warfare by sedition, has created an industry that undermines the one thing that makes possible the greatness of the west in contrast to the rest – all of whom failed by 800ad despite their first mover advantage: individual responsibility for every other’s individual sovereignty in our demonstrated interests: to be free of parasitism leaving us only cooperation to survive, and the trust in one another that we will be so.

Our law schools do not teach moral law with which to produce a population of insurers of trust – they teach immoral activism just as certainly as the marxists and abrahamists did … and still do. Appealing to the vanity of self righteousness in advancing claims of oppression and conspiracy, where exists little other than the remains of meritocracy in a sea of rentiers.

If there is a devil. It’s name was abraham, and it came from UR – and when Hermes brought his cart of lies to the Levant, it is no wonder all in it was stolen. The most powerful lie being the false promise of freedom from evolutionary demand for cooperation at all costs in the defeat of the dark forces of time and ignorance: entropy.

Rebels seeking power are always evil – the only heroes are those seeking the power to deny power, such that only our individual insurance of one another – by pointy objects if necessary survives in markets for cooperation and markets for disputes we call courts.

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute

Reply addressees: @SRCHicks