Theme: Deception

  • (I know that. Which is why we have to expose it.)

    (I know that. Which is why we have to expose it.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 01:56:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635459786845085698

    Reply addressees: @Realitys_Wake

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635459415192084481

  • A police state? How about we just settle for the inability of politicians, publi

    A police state? How about we just settle for the inability of politicians, public intellectuals, the financial sector, the commercial sector, and the academy to lie to us without repercussions? 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 22:54:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635414151911866368

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635055498285268992


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    I understand. It’s a class thing. So, likewise, I have the moral obligation to (we don’t mock) discipline the aggressive, incompetent, and ignorant unworthy of pompousness. After all, we must all do our duty by policing the informational, normative, physical, and institutional commons if we are to preserve the pretense of mass democracy as one of potential equality of competency for self-governance, now, don’t we?

    Cheers. 😉
    And Yes I love respect and admire you even if you’re playing tennis here. 😉

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1635055498285268992

  • @KonstantinKisin, (all) Progressive and Conservative are intentional framings, j

    @KonstantinKisin, (all)

    Progressive and Conservative are intentional framings, just like capitalism and socialism: deception by suggestion.

    The question is instead, whether we pursue empiricism and consistency with the laws of universe and of human be havior (truth), or idealism and inconsistency with the laws of the universe and of human behavior (fraud).

    As far as I know the hate-label ‘whiteness’, equals the european group strategy of dependence on evidence, science, reason and the natural law of cooperation (reciprocity).

    As far as I know, the primary if not exclusive technique of the left, whether the abrahamic sequence of religions in the ancient world or teh marxist-to-woke squence in the modern world, relies on the technique of ‘baiting into hazard’ by the ‘false promise’ (fraud) that it is possible to escape (evade) the five laws of the universe:
    1) endless physical scarcity
    2) endless human acquisitiveness, amorality, practicality and status seeking
    3) endless evolutionary mutation, load, selection
    4) endless increases in concepts vocabulary and logic to explain all three.
    5) and the endless necessity of continuous increases in per capital transformation of energy to maintain evolution in a condition of prosperity.

    The only solution to scaling human cooperation and the benefits of doing so is only possible by maximizing incentives for individual action in pursuit of self determination by self determined means by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty to the commons.

    But our overwhelming amorality in the abscence of norms, traditions, laws, and institutions, is continuously challenged – baited into hazard – by nothing more than fortune tellers, priests, and public ‘intellectuals’.

    Humans operate at the maximum amorality that they can get away with. That’s as necessary a law of nature as is entropy.

    And to make it worse, male acquisition of capital and responsibility in pursuit of status, is the opposite of female acquistion of consumption and irresponsibility in pursuit of status. And this differences is playing out at global scale in every nation that has attempted equality under democracy, because of our experiment with the universal franchise under the false promise of endless economic growth. (Which is reversing with our decliing rates of reproduction.)

    To prevent another abrahamic or marxist dark age, we need to end the ability to sell false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe especially under democxratic participatory government. Because that’s what cults and religions do: generate demand for authority to destroy demonstrated competency with flase promises and credentialism.

    Because they lie, demanding social construction of falsehoods for membership to produce cultural warfare, to undermine meritocracy wherever it exists.

    We know the laws of civilization. The british discovered them with the invention of the modern constitutional rule of law state, by the natural law of cooperation, and the ancient european tradition of sovereignty, responsibility, and tort.

    No more lies.
    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 22:10:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635402951362592769

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635346961363787776

  • @KonstantinKisin, (all) Progressive and Conservative are intentional framings, j

    @KonstantinKisin, (all)

    Progressive and Conservative are intentional framings, just like capitalism and socialism: deception by suggestion.

    The question is instead, whether we pursue empiricism and consistency with the laws of universe and of human be havior (truth), or idealism and inconsistency with the laws of the universe and of human behavior (fraud).

    As far as I know the hate-label ‘whiteness’, equals the european group strategy of dependence on evidence, science, reason and the natural law of cooperation (reciprocity).

    As far as I know, the primary if not exclusive technique of the left, whether the abrahamic sequence of religions in the ancient world or teh marxist-to-woke squence in the modern world, relies on the technique of ‘baiting into hazard’ by the ‘false promise’ (fraud) that it is possible to escape (evade) the five laws of the universe:
    1) endless physical scarcity
    2) endless human acquisitiveness, amorality, practicality and status seeking
    3) endless evolutionary mutation, load, selection
    4) endless increases in concepts vocabulary and logic to explain all three.
    5) and the endless necessity of continuous increases in per capital transformation of energy to maintain evolution in a condition of prosperity.

    The only solution to scaling human cooperation and the benefits of doing so is only possible by maximizing incentives for individual action in pursuit of self determination by self determined means by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty to the commons.

    But our overwhelming amorality in the abscence of norms, traditions, laws, and institutions, is continuously challenged – baited into hazard – by nothing more than fortune tellers, priests, and public ‘intellectuals’.

    Humans operate at the maximum amorality that they can get away with. That’s as necessary a law of nature as is entropy.

    And to make it worse, male acquisition of capital and responsibility in pursuit of status, is the opposite of female acquistion of consumption and irresponsibility in pursuit of status. And this differences is playing out at global scale in every nation that has attempted equality under democracy, because of our experiment with the universal franchise under the false promise of endless economic growth. (Which is reversing with our decliing rates of reproduction.)

    To prevent another abrahamic or marxist dark age, we need to end the ability to sell false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe especially under democxratic participatory government. Because that’s what cults and religions do: generate demand for authority to destroy demonstrated competency with flase promises and credentialism.

    Because they lie, demanding social construction of falsehoods for membership to produce cultural warfare, to undermine meritocracy wherever it exists.

    We know the laws of civilization. The british discovered them with the invention of the modern constitutional rule of law state, by the natural law of cooperation, and the ancient european tradition of sovereignty, responsibility, and tort.

    No more lies.
    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @KonstantinKisin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 22:10:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635402951056392193

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635346961363787776

  • Interesting but good try. I work in cognitive science, truth, economics, and law

    Interesting but good try.
    I work in cognitive science, truth, economics, and law – and in particular the science and logic of lying.
    So, disapproval of uncomfortable truths is one of the most common lies in public discourse today.
    So it’s not that I hate (it’s a foreign emotion) or care about diapproval.
    I care, as a professional and moral matter, when people state disapproval to countersignal a evidentiary truth, as a means of lying and denying: the institutionalization of the otherwise female means of antisocial behavior that’s evolved slowly (by design) over the century.

    So. You think you’re disapproving.
    I’m stating you’re lying.
    And you don’t know the difference.
    And that is one of the many civic ‘devotions’ we’re trying to repair.

    I’m sure you are a decent person.
    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 21:09:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635387647433531393

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635386297618681857

  • Interesting but good try. I work in cognitive science, truth, economics, and law

    Interesting but good try.
    I work in cognitive science, truth, economics, and law – and in particular the science and logic of lying.
    So, disapproval of uncomfortable truths is one of the most common lies in public discourse today.
    So it’s not that I hate (it’s a foreign emotion) or care about diapproval.
    I care, as a professional and moral matter, when people state disapproval to countersignal a evidentiary truth, as a means of lying and denying: the institutionalization of the otherwise female means of antisocial behavior that’s evolved slowly (by design) over the century.

    So. You think you’re disapproving.
    I’m stating you’re lying.
    And you don’t know the difference.
    And that is one of the many civic ‘devotions’ we’re trying to repair.

    I’m sure you are a decent person.
    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Gridlad2 @FrailSkeleton


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 21:09:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635387647299317762

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635386297618681857

  • I do the science. I don’t have to like it. Disapproval is irrelevant. I don’t ha

    I do the science.
    I don’t have to like it.
    Disapproval is irrelevant.
    I don’t have the choice of comfortable lies.
    And over time, none of us do.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 18:55:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635353987858980864

    Reply addressees: @thenoahkinsey

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635352075898085378

  • Russians are acting like the nazis (‘expand for living room’) Ukrainians are usi

    Russians are acting like the nazis (‘expand for living room’)
    Ukrainians are using nazi symbols because the russians hate the nazis. (threat expression)
    This is the irony of it all.
    It’s backwards. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 17:29:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635332166866595840

    Reply addressees: @therealkurt @whatDoYoExpect @CharlesRent @dom_lucre

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635331399824855040

  • Brevity is the soul of wit (analogy, suggestion, deceit), while operational pros

    Brevity is the soul of wit (analogy, suggestion, deceit), while operational prose is the grammar of testimony (truth).

    I can write logic, algorithms, operational proofs (what you’re objecting to), arguments, essays, opinion, history, fiction, scripts, and poetry with near equal facility.

    But my job – requires the paradigm, logic, vocabulary, and syntax of testimonial truth: operational prose, including serialization as a mesurement in defense against ambiguity.

    It looks like ordinary language. But it’s closer to mathematics and programming, but using ordinal rather than cardinal logic.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 15:14:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635298293931556864

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635284366476861444


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Well, you don’t know this, but you should be for engaging with me, that I work in cognitive science, behavioral economics, epistemology, testimony, law, and most especially the logic of lying. So just as when you go to a doctor or lawyer and speak, and in turn they disambiguate what you’ve said into causes, I do the same. It’s just that I see how you’re lying, defrauding, cheating, stealing, undermining, projecting, defending, evading, and denying. And work in this discipline unfortunately means a vast majority of the population is about as smart, cunning, witty, funny as a preschooler.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1635284366476861444

  • Brevity is the soul of wit (analogy, suggestion, deceit), while operational pros

    Brevity is the soul of wit (analogy, suggestion, deceit), while operational prose is the grammar of testimony (truth).

    I can write logic, algorithms, operational proofs (what you’re objecting to), arguments, essays, opinion, history, fiction, scripts, and poetry with near equal facility.

    But my job – requires the paradigm, logic, vocabulary, and syntax of testimonial truth: operational prose, including serialization as a mesurement in defense against ambiguity.

    It looks like ordinary language. But it’s closer to mathematics and programming, but using ordinal rather than cardinal logic.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @goufmanouf @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 15:14:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635298293818224640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635284366476861444


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Well, you don’t know this, but you should be for engaging with me, that I work in cognitive science, behavioral economics, epistemology, testimony, law, and most especially the logic of lying. So just as when you go to a doctor or lawyer and speak, and in turn they disambiguate what you’ve said into causes, I do the same. It’s just that I see how you’re lying, defrauding, cheating, stealing, undermining, projecting, defending, evading, and denying. And work in this discipline unfortunately means a vast majority of the population is about as smart, cunning, witty, funny as a preschooler.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1635284366476861444