Is there a mechanism for simply blocking all calls that originate in India? 😉
I mean, the Indians do a better job at even larger scale with phone scams than the Nigerians did with email scams. Might as well just cut India out of the telecom chain until the business impact causes…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:58:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636124710000816129
Simple test.
Use google to see the history of word usage for woke. It’s a cliff event under Obama.
WHY?
Obama was raised in a ‘hate white people’ church, and his family was an advocate of communism, and he never ran a business or political organization. He met with leading jewish economists, and the ADL/SPLC on timing of white replacement, armed the federal bureaucracy and gave them military equipment in preparation for a civil war. Used the IRS to pursue white and conservative individuals, groups, and businesses. Voted in ObamaCare over the will of the population. Allowed the strategic outsourcing of american business and industry. Allow Chinese spying and capture of technology. Let our men die in raids without rescuing them. Fired the generals who opposed him for doing it. FIlled the ranks with bureaucrats that the soldiers didn’t and don’t respect. Failed to maintain our strategic reserves of military ammunition and supplies. In fact, did nothing to preserve the postwar order creating the opportunity for Chinese and Russian aggression. All he did was pander to the population in speeches and otherwise had no legislative accomplishments. Johnson was destructive, carter was incompetent, Clinton at least moved to the center, but destroyed our military culture by turning it into a proto-woke social program instead. Biden copies trump’s international policy but facilities the woke domestic destruction of our institutions. And has weaponized the FBI against conservatives while giving free passes to the destruction of the radical left. So that’s just a SMALL part of what Obama did other than give nice speeches – the equivalent of fiddling while he set Rome on fire.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:33:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636118450803204097
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636113044165079049
Simple test.
Use google to see the history of word usage for woke. It’s a cliff event under Obama.
WHY?
Obama was raised in a ‘hate white people’ church, and his family was an advocate of communism, and he never ran a business or political organization. He met with leading jewish economists, and the ADL/SPLC on timing of white replacement, armed the federal bureaucracy and gave them military equipment in preparation for a civil war. Used the IRS to pursue white and conservative individuals, groups, and businesses. Voted in ObamaCare over the will of the population. Allowed the strategic outsourcing of american business and industry. Allow Chinese spying and capture of technology. Let our men die in raids without rescuing them. Fired the generals who opposed him for doing it. FIlled the ranks with bureaucrats that the soldiers didn’t and don’t respect. Failed to maintain our strategic reserves of military ammunition and supplies. In fact, did nothing to preserve the postwar order creating the opportunity for Chinese and Russian aggression. All he did was pander to the population in speeches and otherwise had no legislative accomplishments. Johnson was destructive, carter was incompetent, Clinton at least moved to the center, but destroyed our military culture by turning it into a proto-woke social program instead. Biden copies trump’s international policy but facilities the woke domestic destruction of our institutions. And has weaponized the FBI against conservatives while giving free passes to the destruction of the radical left. So that’s just a SMALL part of what Obama did other than give nice speeches – the equivalent of fiddling while he set Rome on fire.
Reply addressees: @ethnojello @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:33:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636118450518085633
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636113044165079049
#WokeGPT
GPT correctly answers the question of the primary races, even if it lies that it’s a social construct. 😉 It’s the first question of human differences I can get it to answer.
1. Black or African American (E African event)
2. Middle Eastern or North African (Dry Persian…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 19:01:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636080081675210752
#WokeGPT
GPT correctly answers the question of the primary races, even if it lies that it’s a social construct. 😉 It’s the first question of human differences I can get it to answer.
1. Black or African American (E African event)
2. Middle Eastern or North African (Dry Persian gulf event)
3. Asian or Pacific Islander (Tibetan plateau event?)
4. Native American or Alaska Native (Siberian Event)
5. White or Caucasian (European event, Anatolian then Steppe introgression events) Should be just ‘European’ and end the ‘Caucasian’ reference entirely which conflates south Eurasian (MENA/INDIA) with European.
This is the order of speciation. It appears to list them in arbitrary order when asked.
At least it only partly lies on this topic. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 19:01:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636080081549262850
FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS > ACTIVISTS.
ROLLING ACCUSATIONS
The Left alliances uses the technique of rolling accusations of unspecific, untestifiable, and often non-existent instuitions, thoughts words and deeds, that they can’t even articulate or apply to the individual, as a means of disapproval masquerading (lying, false accusation) under cover of free speech, without liability for defamation under the pretense, or even apology for past indiscretions.
ENDING ROLLLING ACCUSATIONS AND MORE
We can easily restore and expand defamation in spoken (slander), or published (libel), and remove the limit of demonstrated harm, instead returning to it simply needs to be untestifiable or false. And then we can expand it, as we have in commercial speech (fraud, libel), to public speech in the commons, to the commons, of matters common, and criminalize false accusation AND false promise in political speech.
ALL LEFTISM IS ORGANIZED CRIME
Since ALL lefitst claims are attempts to violate the natural, common, concurrent law, our natural righst obligations and inalienations under that law, and the capture of that law in our constitution and code, we would, rather quikcly outlaw no only the explicity political left, but the seditious left, and the means by which the left achieves funding of its war against our people and civilization by organized crime in entertainment, media, academy, finance, and state.
ITS POSSIBLE
Easy to do.
You just need to ‘show up’ to make it happen.
And the the market for the suppression of crimniality we call the courts, do their job.
In ten years ‘its fixed’.
That’s the amount of time legislation and regulation are required to spread through the pouplation and convert into norm and habit.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:31:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636072567017553924
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636017896370614273
FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS > ACTIVISTS.
ROLLING ACCUSATIONS
The Left alliances uses the technique of rolling accusations of unspecific, untestifiable, and often non-existent instuitions, thoughts words and deeds, that they can’t even articulate or apply to the individual, as a means of disapproval masquerading (lying, false accusation) under cover of free speech, without liability for defamation under the pretense, or even apology for past indiscretions.
ENDING ROLLLING ACCUSATIONS AND MORE
We can easily restore and expand defamation in spoken (slander), or published (libel), and remove the limit of demonstrated harm, instead returning to it simply needs to be untestifiable or false. And then we can expand it, as we have in commercial speech (fraud, libel), to public speech in the commons, to the commons, of matters common, and criminalize false accusation AND false promise in political speech.
ALL LEFTISM IS ORGANIZED CRIME
Since ALL lefitst claims are attempts to violate the natural, common, concurrent law, our natural righst obligations and inalienations under that law, and the capture of that law in our constitution and code, we would, rather quikcly outlaw no only the explicity political left, but the seditious left, and the means by which the left achieves funding of its war against our people and civilization by organized crime in entertainment, media, academy, finance, and state.
ITS POSSIBLE
Easy to do.
You just need to ‘show up’ to make it happen.
And the the market for the suppression of crimniality we call the courts, do their job.
In ten years ‘its fixed’.
That’s the amount of time legislation and regulation are required to spread through the pouplation and convert into norm and habit.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:31:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636072566849695744
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636017896370614273
No, just that men ‘manipulate’ by nonsense pretense of rational argument. They don’t manipulate as women do by emotion social construction.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 16:18:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636039258669449218
Reply addressees: @Amphianda @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636034134614364161
The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine men since the dawn of time:
“Seduction by Baiting into Hazard”
The Female > Abrahamic > Marxist sequence
How many women in divorce court today provoke men intentionally into physical force, then claim they are victims?
What is the left doing to the conservatives and the government? Why are the government and the right accused of authoritarianism when they police the commons against the left. And why do we oddly have any sense of guilt about it. Yet the right can protest and it strikes fear into the hearts of government and the left?
The question is rather odd really: why do we put up with the feminine-left false oppression narrative, when in both cases we are correcting female anti-social behavior by social economic and political harm, but suppress male anti-social behavior by physical harm?
Wny do we pander to women and the left?
Is it culture or instinct? It appears to be animal instinct. Becuase it’s irrational on its face.
WHy is ‘masculine policing of the commons’ even vaguely considered authoritarian when the entire purpose of the feminine and the left is baiting into hazard: ‘the crime of construction’ just like in the inverse they egage in deceit by ‘social construction’.
Seduction > Baiting Into Hazard > Social Construction of A Falsehood > Under cover of what? Pretense of innocence? Incompetence?
Why do we permit feminine crime and not masculine?
Biology we need to ‘counter’.
That’s why I worked on the law, to equally suppress feminine criminality as we have suppressed masculine.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 15:33:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636027899844128771
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636022835008208896
The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine men since the dawn of time:
“Seduction by Baiting into Hazard”
The Female > Abrahamic > Marxist sequence
How many women in divorce court today provoke men intentionally into physical force, then claim they are victims?
What is the left doing to the conservatives and the government? Why are the government and the right accused of authoritarianism when they police the commons against the left. And why do we oddly have any sense of guilt about it. Yet the right can protest and it strikes fear into the hearts of government and the left?
The question is rather odd really: why do we put up with the feminine-left false oppression narrative, when in both cases we are correcting female anti-social behavior by social economic and political harm, but suppress male anti-social behavior by physical harm?
Wny do we pander to women and the left?
Is it culture or instinct? It appears to be animal instinct. Becuase it’s irrational on its face.
WHy is ‘masculine policing of the commons’ even vaguely considered authoritarian when the entire purpose of the feminine and the left is baiting into hazard: ‘the crime of construction’ just like in the inverse they egage in deceit by ‘social construction’.
Seduction > Baiting Into Hazard > Social Construction of A Falsehood > Under cover of what? Pretense of innocence? Incompetence?
Why do we permit feminine crime and not masculine?
Biology we need to ‘counter’.
That’s why I worked on the law, to equally suppress feminine criminality as we have suppressed masculine.
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 15:33:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636027899714187266
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636022835008208896