Theme: Deception

  • PROPERTARIANISM: THE INTELLECTUAL DISINFECTANT Hurry! Today you can cleanse your

    PROPERTARIANISM: THE INTELLECTUAL DISINFECTANT

    Hurry! Today you can cleanse yourself of Anglo enlightenment universalism, German Rationalism, Jewish Pseudoscience, Christian Superstition, and whatever other other intellectual disease the ails you. (Members of the Cathedral, Islamism and Buddhism may require higher doses and longer treatment periods.) Save humanity from all variants of the Levantine Plague.

    Sorry. No discounts. It’s against our principles. 😉

    -The Management


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-16 01:55:00 UTC

  • ROMAN CUT THIS: #13 – LESTERIAN VERBALISM Jan lester’s theory of liberty is an o

    ROMAN CUT THIS: #13 – LESTERIAN VERBALISM

    Jan lester’s theory of liberty is an obscurantist tautological verbalism that starts with the mere normative meaning of liberty and he loosely deduces subjective value, rather than starting with subjective value, constructing morality, and defining liberty as a legal constraint against the members of the state as yet another statement of property rights. since nothing he states is existential, he demonstrates the fallacy of rationalism in creating mere analogies rather than operational necessities.

    Only in libertine or marxist philosophy could you get away with anything that ridiculous outside of a temple of one kind or another. Only in philosophy could you get away with something that ridiculous.

    And that’s before I get to the abuses of Critical Rationalism. For some reason Lester confuses falsification as hardening a theory, with legitimizing incompetence – a failure to demonstrate that he hasn’t just created a tautology. (Which he has.)

    Apparently I have to do a summary of on all the extant libertarian follies instead of just making fun of Jan Lester. On the other hand, at least he isn’t promoting libertinism – he’s just promoting pseudo-rationalism, pseudo-science, and sloppy thinking.

    Which doesn’t put him in too exclusive a club. Sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-16 00:14:00 UTC

  • PAGAN SYMBOLS ARE NOT HATE SYMBOLS You do understand that this is a war on OUR i

    PAGAN SYMBOLS ARE NOT HATE SYMBOLS

    You do understand that this is a war on OUR identity so that others can advance THEIR identity, right?

    Mercilessly Wring the Cathedral out of Academy and State.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-15 23:50:00 UTC

  • OOPS!!! “THE GREAT COURSES” AND “THE GREAT BOOKS” of THE WESTERN CANON You know,

    OOPS!!! “THE GREAT COURSES” AND “THE GREAT BOOKS” of THE WESTERN CANON

    You know, both the great courses series, and the western canon are cults-of-democracy, majority rule, and universalism, rather than cults of the jury, one-vote-one-family, and universalism among christians.

    In other words, we HAVE TO CLEAN the western Canon of impossible fallacies.

    Nietzsche stands largely alone.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-15 22:38:00 UTC

  • THE BEGINNINGS OF PSEUDOSCIENCE Boas, Freud, Cantor, Marx

    THE BEGINNINGS OF PSEUDOSCIENCE

    Boas, Freud, Cantor, Marx

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-15 11:38:00 UTC

  • “Women are not damsels in distress that need to be rescued, they are oppressed v

    —“Women are not damsels in distress that need to be rescued, they are oppressed victims that need to be saved.”—

    Josh Strodtbeck.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-15 11:38:00 UTC

  • CANADIAN PRIVILEGE (reposted) (fun) AN ANSWER THAT YOU WON’T LIKE: PRIVILEGE NOT

    CANADIAN PRIVILEGE

    (reposted) (fun)

    AN ANSWER THAT YOU WON’T LIKE: PRIVILEGE NOT CHOICE

    Humans justify. Justification is necessary for adaptation, and we are very good at justification.

    Canada is the world’s most privileged country, so Canadians can justify unprecedented luxuries.

    Imagine, anywhere else in the world, a country of that size, with so few people, with that many natural resources, that did not have to defend that territory and resources from constant incursion by neighboring powers.

    Ukraine and Siberia are two modern examples. Ukraine has roughly the same population, is rich in resources, and has been the victim of perpetual struggle for self determination from Mongols, Poland, Austria, Russia, the USSR, and now Russia again. Siberia is currently being occupied by Chinese intent on doing exactly what Russia did to Ukraine: fill it with people then justify taking it by force.

    Canadians have the best of all worlds: a benevolent global empire on their border that cannot tolerate any instability in, or invasion of, Canada; oceans for all other borders; and therefore near immunity from the high cost of self defense, and the necessity of nationalism.

    Canada and Australia, like the UK are for all strategic intents and purposes, islands, that like the UK, rely upon island-people-ethics: no fear of outsiders. Little fear of conquest. Little conflict over territory. No conflict over sovereignty.

    Having never experienced the divisiveness of slavery, Canadians have never experienced the problem of internal race conflict. Slavery is the defining issue of american history and race and culture conflict remain unresolved and un-resolvable. The immateriality of french divisiveness versus american urban and rural divisiveness, causes less conflict in Canada but is equally as damaging, since it again causes multiculturalism that harms the center and west.

    The data says that Canada is more conservative than the states, and that the only thing that forces Canadian policy differences is the french voting block. The french immigrants to Quebec were, unlike the Anglo immigrants to the other provinces, from the lower classes. So those class, religion, culture, family structure, and language differences, of course skew the country a bit as well. Unlike Canada, USA’s demographic blocks are not isolated but intermingled as horizontal bands reflecting the cultures that immigrated at different latitudes of the east coast. (See the “Nine Nations Of North America”.)

    Now, Canadians tend to look at this strategic privilege as a product of their high mindedness, but nothing could be further from the truth. Cultural differences and Political policy in all countries reflect that which people are ABLE TO implement as policy, and ABLE adopt as cultural preference. People prefer luxuries that they CAN possess. They CAN possess them for strategic, not cultural or political reasons.

    But as soon as Canada reaches the level of cultural competition that is present in the states, North and South Italy, France, Germany, and the UK, west and east Ukraine, West and east Russia, Tibet, Mongolia and china, conflict over cultural competition will increase there as well, and the long run of Canadian privilege to treat multiculturalism as a ‘good’ rather than as a profitable luxury in small doses, will end as it is ending in the rest of the world.

    Islands have the highest trust cultures for a reason. They can afford to. They are able to. Because homogeneity allows for political and cultural homogeneity. And homogeneity reduces political, economic, cultural conflict, and turns class differences into virtues because tolerance for redistribution increases with homogeneity of kinship.

    Canada is importing to its ‘island’ the promise of low-trust, high conflict, authoritarian polities, and thereby ending its island luxury.

    (So that is why we americans tend to see cultural self-congratulation of Canadians as the prancing and preening of spoiled children whose safety and luxury Americans pay for.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-15 06:45:00 UTC

  • HOW DID I END UP AS THE JAMES RANDI OF LIBERTARIANISM? Not sure how I ended up a

    HOW DID I END UP AS THE JAMES RANDI OF LIBERTARIANISM?

    Not sure how I ended up as the debunker of libertine pseudoscientific and pseudo rational faith healers. But I guess someone has to do it.

    Propertarianism.

    Sigh….


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-14 13:27:00 UTC

  • THE MANNERS OF TRUTH It is one thing to argue whether x leads to y “is true”. It

    THE MANNERS OF TRUTH

    It is one thing to argue whether x leads to y “is true”. It is another to argue whether we and our opponent’s speak truthfully.

    And now, we know, that the statement “x leads to y is true” can *only* mean “I promise you will also find that x leads to y”.

    We have been indoctrinated into untruthful speech. We have become a culture of liars. We have lost Grammar, lost Rhetoric, lost history.

    Imagine a news talk show, where one spoke truthfully and the other didn’t.

    We can and should call liars liars, and even vectors for lies, liars.

    Because it is true.

    To treat manners with higher priority than truth is to let others steal from the normative commons merely by their utterances. And moral men neither can steal, nor tolerate stealing from others.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-11 22:20:00 UTC

  • THE ADVANTAGE OF LIE-THEORIES (UNTRUTHFUL THEORIES) Lie-theories can accumulate

    THE ADVANTAGE OF LIE-THEORIES (UNTRUTHFUL THEORIES)

    Lie-theories can accumulate references, quotes, citations, recommendations, and advocacy, more cheaply and easily that truthful-theories. And they do.

    It is more advantageous, and cheaper to lie, than to speak the truth. Just as it is more advantageous to commit fraud than it is to trade with the fully informed. just as it is more advantageous to work for the state, than in the market. Just as it is more advantageous to conquer than to trade.

    Free riding is always more advantageous to one party than another. But it is less advantageous to a polity.

    This is why polities matter – without them, morality is not in anyone’s interest. Together, as a polity, morality is in *nearly* everyone’s interest, if not in every single soul’s interest. Conquerors, oligarchs, and their dependents are the ones who benefit least from morality.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-11 04:42:00 UTC