The pseudosciences, pseudorationalisms, and supernaturalisms are all permanently desirable by the human mind, for both incoming and outgoing functions: (a) we desire the discount on reasoning provided by false certainties, and (b) we desire the discount that the false certainty provides in negotiation.
Theme: Deception
-
The Market Demand For Falsehoods
The pseudosciences, pseudorationalisms, and supernaturalisms are all permanently desirable by the human mind, for both incoming and outgoing functions: (a) we desire the discount on reasoning provided by false certainties, and (b) we desire the discount that the false certainty provides in negotiation.
-
Ah, but they are my words. Their order, their emphasis, their choice, are mine.
Ah, but they are my words. Their order, their emphasis, their choice, are mine.
Ah, but over the millennia we incrementally whittle the error bias and lies from the prior generation’s words, leaving but the necessary underneath.
Ah, but truth is not arrogant, it merely exists – laid bare by erosion. And the error bias and lies, lay about in the dust: the remains of the foolish, the arrogant, and deceitful of the generations that came before us.
You cannot defeat truth with shaming, rallying, and moral argument that claims offense, since truth holds the apex of morality, and all else is but error, bias, and lie beneath it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 18:08:00 UTC
-
The De-Professionalization of Information Distribution
THE DE-PROFESSIONALIZATION OF INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION Little did they know what they were doing. But by removing the duel, libel, slander, and falsehood from the common law, the state eliminated warranty (skin in the game). And by the elimination of warranty under the law, converted a moral imperative captured in common law, to a moral imperative discarded in exchange for market profits. It was the elimination of duel, libel, slander, and falsehood under the assumption of a naturally moral man, and the catastrophe of free speech that made possible the war against the west: judaic cosmopolitanism, puritan postmodernism, french pseudoscientific moralism, and german pseudo-rationalism.
THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF BUREAUCRACY: DE-PROFESSIONALIZATION AND LOSS OF WARRANTY (SKIN IN THE GAME) -
The De-Professionalization of Information Distribution
THE DE-PROFESSIONALIZATION OF INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION Little did they know what they were doing. But by removing the duel, libel, slander, and falsehood from the common law, the state eliminated warranty (skin in the game). And by the elimination of warranty under the law, converted a moral imperative captured in common law, to a moral imperative discarded in exchange for market profits. It was the elimination of duel, libel, slander, and falsehood under the assumption of a naturally moral man, and the catastrophe of free speech that made possible the war against the west: judaic cosmopolitanism, puritan postmodernism, french pseudoscientific moralism, and german pseudo-rationalism.
THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF BUREAUCRACY: DE-PROFESSIONALIZATION AND LOSS OF WARRANTY (SKIN IN THE GAME) -
An Objective Analysis Of Cultural Philosophies
Ill give you the objective model instead: 1-utopians(plato)(hindus),
- The Utopian strategy is train men to be good, so that no conflict need occur.
2-truth tellers (aristotle),
- The Aryan strategy is to resolve conflicts early and quickly so that they cannot be seized in a moment of weakness.
3-truth avoiders (sun tsu),
- Sun Tzu is the first philosopher of china. His message is to avoid conflict by use of delay and deceive until you can seize an opportunity in your opponent’s moment of weakness.
- The Russian strategy is to exaggerate moral hazard, as an excuse to accumulate defenses, then seize territory in a moment of weakness.
4 – The Truth Benders (russia) 4-liars (abraham),
- The Judaic strategy is to use suggestion to create moral hazard, and then seize the weakness once it (deterministically) occurs.
5-lying+ignorance(muhammed)
- The Muslim strategy is to wear down the weak and overwhelm them in their moment of greatest weakness.
-
An Objective Analysis Of Cultural Philosophies
Ill give you the objective model instead: 1-utopians(plato)(hindus),
- The Utopian strategy is train men to be good, so that no conflict need occur.
2-truth tellers (aristotle),
- The Aryan strategy is to resolve conflicts early and quickly so that they cannot be seized in a moment of weakness.
3-truth avoiders (sun tsu),
- Sun Tzu is the first philosopher of china. His message is to avoid conflict by use of delay and deceive until you can seize an opportunity in your opponent’s moment of weakness.
- The Russian strategy is to exaggerate moral hazard, as an excuse to accumulate defenses, then seize territory in a moment of weakness.
4 – The Truth Benders (russia) 4-liars (abraham),
- The Judaic strategy is to use suggestion to create moral hazard, and then seize the weakness once it (deterministically) occurs.
5-lying+ignorance(muhammed)
- The Muslim strategy is to wear down the weak and overwhelm them in their moment of greatest weakness.
-
The Different Conflict Strategies of Different Cultures
- Sun Tzu is the first philosopher of china. His message is to avoid conflict by use of delay and deceive until you can seize an opportunity in your opponent’s moment of weakness. (strong but beset by many enemies)
- The Aryan strategy is to resolve conflicts early and quickly so that they cannot be seized in a moment of weakness. (strong but small in number)
- the jewish strategy is to use suggestion to create moral hazard, and then seize the weakness once it (deterministically) occurs. ( weak and necessarily parasitic)
- The russian strategy is to exaggerate moral hazard, as an excuse to accumulate defenses, then seize territory in a moment of weakness. (strong, beset by many enemies, but not trusting of each other or leadership)
- the muslim strategy is to wear down the weak and overwhelm them in their moment of greatest weakness. ( poor, disorganized, untrusting, but large in number)
-
The Different Conflict Strategies of Different Cultures
- Sun Tzu is the first philosopher of china. His message is to avoid conflict by use of delay and deceive until you can seize an opportunity in your opponent’s moment of weakness. (strong but beset by many enemies)
- The Aryan strategy is to resolve conflicts early and quickly so that they cannot be seized in a moment of weakness. (strong but small in number)
- the jewish strategy is to use suggestion to create moral hazard, and then seize the weakness once it (deterministically) occurs. ( weak and necessarily parasitic)
- The russian strategy is to exaggerate moral hazard, as an excuse to accumulate defenses, then seize territory in a moment of weakness. (strong, beset by many enemies, but not trusting of each other or leadership)
- the muslim strategy is to wear down the weak and overwhelm them in their moment of greatest weakness. ( poor, disorganized, untrusting, but large in number)
-
We Will End History As We Started It: With Violence.
(by James Augustus Berens) We Will Bring About The End Of History. Not through submission but through sovereignty. Not through permission but through demand. Not through falsehoods but through truth. Not through discretionary rule but through rule of natural law. Not through majority monopoly ascent but through minority market consent and dissent. Not through supernatural monotheism but through historical polytheism Not through indulging the meek, feeble minded and vulgar but through the promotion of the strong, wise and beautiful. The Hebrews had it backward: man has not fallen from God’s grace; he has transcended the primitive through domestication of his underclasses and his alpha males. Man wasn’t cast from the Garden for eating from the tree of knowledge; we built the garden through the inter-generational accumulation of informational capital. We had the prefect government, but we failed to anticipate and protect ourselves from the industrialization of misinformation, deceit and pseudoscience. History ends with the completion of the western project: The Truthful Society. We must demand truth by leaving our enemies no alternative but to compete in the market for association, cooperation, production, information, reproduction, commons, dispute resolution, and rule. The alternative is to fall into another dark age from which we may never recover: to submit once again to the dark forces of mysticism, ignorance, deceit, and dysgenia. –James Augustus Berens