Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • DEFINITION: ‘CUCKSERVATIVE’ (from elsewhere) Um. Let me ‘enhance’ this a bit by

    DEFINITION: ‘CUCKSERVATIVE’

    (from elsewhere)

    Um. Let me ‘enhance’ this a bit by using a series:

    1) A cuck refers to a ‘cuckhold’ – a man that attempts to obtain feminine attention by conforming to feminine whims. A man who is sexually emasculated.

    2) The portmanteau ‘cuckservative’ refers to a man that attempts to obtain feminine approval by conforming to feminist whims in politics. ie: A man who is politically emasculated.

    3) And the extension of ‘cuckservative’ to outgroups: jews/neocons/globalists extends this criticism to currying favor by political submission. ie: A man who is nationally and culturally emasculated.

    4) And the references to higher testosterone, more muscular, larger, and larger-phallic blacks is a means of further ridiculing and humiliating these men.

    5) And the graphic accusations of watching (superior) black males having sex with their wives and girlfriends (or daughters for that matter) is just an extreme accusation of their physical, political and national inferiority.

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 13:36:00 UTC

  • The reason the left has to lie is inferiority. So meritocracy is unacceptable an

    The reason the left has to lie is inferiority. So meritocracy is unacceptable and parasitism is necessary.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 13:22:00 UTC

  • The reason conservatives had to lie, is that meritocracy is eugenic, and incompa

    The reason conservatives had to lie, is that meritocracy is eugenic, and incompatible with universal enfranchisement.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 13:21:00 UTC

  • ARGUMENT: CIRCUMVENTING METHODOLOGICAL FRAMING (argumentative methods)(advanced

    ARGUMENT: CIRCUMVENTING METHODOLOGICAL FRAMING

    (argumentative methods)(advanced followers)(must read)

    THE EXAMPLE: RATIONALISM

    Lets use this excellent question to illustrate how to circumvent the problem of argumentative framing within philosophy, and why I hold such disdain for ‘rationalist’ and ‘literary’ philosophy.

    —“How do you connect platonism to post-structuralism?”–Arthur Calloni

    Do you mean, how do I connect platonic idealism > kant, >post structuralism with aristotelian descriptivism > hume > cognitive science?

    See? I just did connect platonism to post-structuralism. How? a requirement for operations (actions) rather than meanings (imaginations)

    THE TECHNIQUE: INCREASE THE PRECISION OF ARGUMENT

    I view trying to validate philosophy with philosophy as the same as trying to validate religion with religion: ridiculous nonsense: an attempt at fraud.

    One of the techniques I use is to test philosophy by increasing the demand for knowledge avoid the fallacy of relying on philosophy for anything -particularly self criticism. Instead, I criticize philosophy with science, law, economics, and history.

    I test all claims in the social sciences, by natural law, and outside of natural law by evolutionary constraints.

    You need a lot more knowledge to speak testimonially (operational literature) than you need to speak scientifically (empirical[correspondent] literature)

    You need a lot more knowledge to speak Scientifically (empirical literature), than you do philosophically (rational literature).

    You need a lot more knowledge to speak philosophically(rational literature) than you do religiously (wisdom literature).

    You need a lot more knowledge to speak religiously (wisdom literature) than you do colloquially (experiential literature).

    So when someone asks you to defend a position within a context, increase the demand for knowledge by increasing the precision of the method of measurement (analogy) that you are employing.

    And recognize that any question requires a certain degree of information, and any truth proposition requires a great deal of information, if not *complete* information.

    And that in common discourse, most coercion in this world is conducted by loading (ridicule, shaming, rallying).

    In common argument most deception is conducted by moral framing.

    And that most frauds in this world are constructed by methodological framing.

    And that in politics, moral(ideological), religious, philosophical, and legislative framing. But that all of these frames are decidable by operational testing under natural law within cooperation, and evolutionary demand outside of cooperation.

    Language was invented to negotiate, and most methods of argument were invented to lie.

    There is only one method of speaking truthfully: the testimony, in operational grammar, of that which has survived tests of categorical, logical, empirical, existential, moral consistency, and scope completeness – and your warranty that you have done so, upon pain of restitution, punishment, or death.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 13:13:00 UTC

  • THE CONUNDRUM OF GERMAN PHILOSOPHY The conundrum of German Philosophy is that it

    THE CONUNDRUM OF GERMAN PHILOSOPHY

    The conundrum of German Philosophy is that it uses the right message (truth and duty), uses the right method (moral literature), but engages in conflation (pseudo-rationalism).

    It’s exasperating.

    The anglos used the wrong message (equality), the right method (moral literature) and continued aristotelian deflation (science).

    But it does no good to say the wrong thing rightly, any more than it does good to say the right thing wrongly.

    Then we get to the jews and the french who say the wrong thing wrongly.

    It’s amazing that the enlightenment survived even in its current form.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 12:32:00 UTC

  • The only reason political ideology, philosophy and policy are difficult: everyon

    The only reason political ideology, philosophy and policy are difficult:

    everyone’s lying.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 12:27:00 UTC

  • “What about Kierkegaard? He taught to the world the meaning of perspective!”—

    —“What about Kierkegaard? He taught to the world the meaning of perspective!”— A Friend

    If you want to read fantasy literature, read german philosophy. If you want to read truth, simply read science, law, and history.

    1) The works of Religion (pseudo-mythology – latin) (lies)

    2) The works of Platonism (pseudo-rationalism – german and french) (ideals) (postmodernists)

    3) The works of Frauds (pseudoscience – Jewish) (Frauds) (freud, marx, boaz, frankfurt school)

    4) The works of Literature (analogy – the works of the anglo historians and russian literature) (analogies)

    5) The works of History, Law, Science ( description – the works of anglos and aristotelians.) (truth)

    Roughly speaking, I”ve just described each standard deviation in iQ

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 12:25:00 UTC

  • HANDLING HOSTILE DISCOURSE WITH ONE QUESTION —“You don’t let the enemy dictate

    HANDLING HOSTILE DISCOURSE WITH ONE QUESTION

    —“You don’t let the enemy dictate the terms of the debate. You just kill them.”— Jerrick Harald

    There exists only one form debate: perfect reciprocity. All the rest is negotiation until we reach a point of perfect reciprocity. If you are not engaging in perfect reciprocity, then you are engaging in negotiation. In mere negotiation we are outside of reciprocity, and therefore violence, fraud, cooperation, avoidance, and boycott are all on the table.

    Always ask “Are we are engaged in a debate, wherein we speak cooperatively with perfect reciprocity? Or are we engaged in a negotiation in which we attempting to determine whether we may cooperate? Or are we engaged in threatening, to determine whether we will engage in violence?”

    “OK, so you are threatening me, right? Then I will respond with violence.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 12:07:00 UTC

  • CHINESE VS WESTERN VIRTUE SIGNALLING —“What the fuck does [very different virt

    CHINESE VS WESTERN VIRTUE SIGNALLING

    —“What the fuck does [very different virtue signaling in China] mean? Curt Doolittle. You are still here, explain.”— Anon

    Sorry, I missed the OP’s request for an answer.

    1) Ethnic europeans demonstrate higher, more consistent, more constant creativity (innovation) in all walks of life. (See: Charles Murray. Nicholas Wade)

    2) Some of this can be attributed to the higher occurrence of personality traits (a) openness to experience, (b) ‘worry/anxiety’, (so called ‘Neuroticism’) in ethnic europeans.

    3) Much of this can be attributed to the lower underclass burden, and therefore higher trust, superior norms and institutions of western civilization. (See: Garrett Jones)

    4) The majority of this effect can be attributed to the various uniquenesses of western civilization’s use of ‘heroism’ (climbing the dominance hierarchy by demonstrated works – or perhaps more so that climbing the dominance hierarchy is not prohibited as it is in many other cultures) as well as the competition between small states (princedoms) for talent in order for the nobility to virtue signal. (the origins of which we understand fairly clearly: See Emmanuel Todd, Karen Armstrong, and J.P.Mallory et al.)

    SUMMARY:

    For cultural, genetic, and demographic reasons, western Virtue Signaling has fostered individual risk taking, achievement, and reward at the cost of hierarchical disruption more so than all other civilizations combined – (at least until the merger of cultural marxism (the frankfurt school’s ‘critical theory’) and the French then Anglo postmodernists, (which you see evidence in the comments by some of the effeminate ‘useful idiots’ above).

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 08:40:00 UTC

  • JOURNALISTS: DRUNKARDS, WITH POOR MENTAL FUNCTION. by Alexander Brown Neuroscien

    JOURNALISTS: DRUNKARDS, WITH POOR MENTAL FUNCTION.

    by Alexander Brown

    Neuroscientist Tara Swift’s peer reviewed study for the London Press Club, found that journalists are dumb and mentally operate maximally below the lowest level of the average population.

    See?

    That partly explain some of the nonsense we have been fed by the delusional lot in the mainstream media fraternity. And stupid me, I get so pissed with the journalistic garbage, I keep thinking the more hurried modalities to getting the whole bunch of expert local liars effectively replaced, so to sanitize the informational commons.

    Now though, I could be a bit calm until the journalistic purge. As besides the deliberate pursuit of designed agenda by JOURNALISTS, I could ‘confirm’ via Tara, that these hired media lads are also mentally handicapped. So that while the western information hacks are the “dumb” lot that drink just too much and live unhealthily while engaged in the plotted dissemination of outright lies, misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda, their inferior Ghanaian counterparts that look to them for inspiration may actually deserve some sympathy than more scorn prior to the calculated purge.

    Poor, and low – waged, media boys and girls are VUNERABLE FOR EXPLOITATION. Vunerables operating at some of the lowest IQs, must not be informing the people. They may have to be helped, and not allowed to continue the informational commons pollution and the promotion of agnotology.

    So here is that part of interest from Tara’s:

    “[T]the highest functions of journalists brains were operating at a lower level than the average population, due to dehydration, self-medicating, and fueling their brains with caffeine and high-sugar foods”.

    That says loads. Enough, to inform the purge.

    Alexander. May 20, 2017.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-20 16:59:00 UTC