CHINESE VS WESTERN VIRTUE SIGNALLING —“What the fuck does [very different virt

CHINESE VS WESTERN VIRTUE SIGNALLING

—“What the fuck does [very different virtue signaling in China] mean? Curt Doolittle. You are still here, explain.”— Anon

Sorry, I missed the OP’s request for an answer.

1) Ethnic europeans demonstrate higher, more consistent, more constant creativity (innovation) in all walks of life. (See: Charles Murray. Nicholas Wade)

2) Some of this can be attributed to the higher occurrence of personality traits (a) openness to experience, (b) ‘worry/anxiety’, (so called ‘Neuroticism’) in ethnic europeans.

3) Much of this can be attributed to the lower underclass burden, and therefore higher trust, superior norms and institutions of western civilization. (See: Garrett Jones)

4) The majority of this effect can be attributed to the various uniquenesses of western civilization’s use of ‘heroism’ (climbing the dominance hierarchy by demonstrated works – or perhaps more so that climbing the dominance hierarchy is not prohibited as it is in many other cultures) as well as the competition between small states (princedoms) for talent in order for the nobility to virtue signal. (the origins of which we understand fairly clearly: See Emmanuel Todd, Karen Armstrong, and J.P.Mallory et al.)

SUMMARY:

For cultural, genetic, and demographic reasons, western Virtue Signaling has fostered individual risk taking, achievement, and reward at the cost of hierarchical disruption more so than all other civilizations combined – (at least until the merger of cultural marxism (the frankfurt school’s ‘critical theory’) and the French then Anglo postmodernists, (which you see evidence in the comments by some of the effeminate ‘useful idiots’ above).

Curt Doolittle