Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • CTHULU SWIMS LEFT – IN STOICISM TOO —“I was under the impression that Stoicism

    CTHULU SWIMS LEFT – IN STOICISM TOO

    —“I was under the impression that Stoicism was the antithesis of femininity.”—Steven Edward

    That’s true, BUT ‘Cthulu swims left’:

    *any portfolio of decidability not explicitly right will be incrementally converted to the left.*

    This is why interpretation cannot depend on introspection or intuition but must depend on decidability independent of it.

    Ergo, a lot of stoics swing left, and they cause stoicism in all its revivals to swim left.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 10:48:00 UTC

  • by Michael Churchill Logical problem: If the core of woman’s survival strategy i

    by Michael Churchill

    Logical problem: If the core of woman’s survival strategy is duplicity, and if in the Propertarian paradigm, duplicity will be outlawed, will not women be reduced to serfs?

    How will they be able to flower and be their full selves if they are barred from use of duplicity?

    It seems to me they will sidle up to alphas and treat them well. And the status of betas will be raised and so more betas will be seen as attractive as well.

    But this all presupposes that this community could be brought into being within a larger political entity (i.e. the US) when said larger entity is hostile to it.

    You’re basically asking to be Waco’ed unless you go seriously esoteric in your doctrines inside the community.

    (CURT: I think the concepts of esotericism evolve as marketing (justification) in response – they are not the product)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 06:28:00 UTC

  • ARE THERE ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS FOR WHITE SUPREMACY THAT AREN’T RACIST?”— (omfg..

    https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-good-arguments-for-white-supremacy-without-being-racist/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=66fd9a7a&srid=u4Qv–“CURT: ARE THERE ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS FOR WHITE SUPREMACY THAT AREN’T RACIST?”—

    (omfg… sigh)

    If somehow acknowledging racial differences is ‘racism’ then no because you can’t ask the question, and you cant answer it either

    If ‘racism’ refers to treating an individual by the average properties of his race then that is a legitimate criticism of an illogical behavior.

    If ‘racism’ refers to criticism of the reproductive, cultural, political strategies of a competing group, rather than criticism of one’s inability to defend against the harm caused you by that group, then that’s illogical also.

    If ‘racism’ refers to a preference for nationalism or separatism in order to reduce conflicts between groups and improve the conditions of either by creating norms and institutions more suitable for each group’s differing wants and needs, then criticizing that is not rational.

    White ‘supremacy’ in nearly every field is simply a fact – although the reason for white success (the high cost of truth even if it may disrupt the dominance hierarchy, and therefore resulting in reason, debate, argument, common law, science, medicine, engineering, technology etc.) is something we have only recently begun to understand.

    White genetic supremacy does not appear correct – at least regarding the Han/Korean/Japanese. All racial groups both evolved in different geographical conditions and in doing so produced different levels of neoteny. With east asians most, whites next, mixed colors next, and blacks last. The reason being that whites and asians have been in homogenous groups a long time, under agrarianism and have succeeded at selecting for neoteny. And secondly, because of the pressures of agrarianism and the winter seasons, the asians and western europeans have more successfully reduced the sizes of the ‘troublesome’ (underclass) population leaving almost the entire population descendent from the genetic middle class. Every other race and subrace has dominated warmer climates where the rate of maturity as a means of surviving a higher disease gradient requires earlier maturity and deeper maturity and therefore limited selection for neoteny.

    The superiority of europeans appears to be the result of a rather small set of noble families never exceeding a few hundred thousand in total population combined with a middle class majority population who expanded downward as the lower and underclasses were reduced through starvation, disease, plague, war, and aggressive use of hanging.

    So because europeans and asians lived in homogenous groups that were somewhat insulated from sun belt density of diverse and nomadic pastoral peoples, they were able to genetically select (not so much evolve) for superior populations.

    The differences between china and europe are largely that china started earlier. THe muslims were not able to cause a thousand year dark age in china like they were in Europe by collapsing the four major ancient civilizations and reducing them to sub 85IQ averages.

    But the west is faster than china in both the ancient and modern worlds because of its institutions of ‘truthfulness’ instead of ‘face-saving’, which allowed the west to advance more quickly in both ancient and modern eras.

    I hope this helps.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 06:12:00 UTC

  • DEI VOLUNT!!!! (THE GODS WILL IT) For pagans rising above their abrahamic deceiv

    DEI VOLUNT!!!! (THE GODS WILL IT)

    For pagans rising above their abrahamic deceivers, it’s “DEI VOLUNT”: “The Gods Will It”, not “Deus Vult”: “God Wills It”.

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 12:57:00 UTC

  • HOW IS THIS NOT AN ATTEMPT AT DECEPTION? 100% of people die. There are four caus

    HOW IS THIS NOT AN ATTEMPT AT DECEPTION?

    100% of people die.

    There are four causes of death.

    1 – Biological Failure, (UNAVOIDABLE)

    2 – Biological self abuse ( SELF NEGLIGENCE )

    3 – Accident, and (UNINTENTIONAL, OR NEGLIGENT )

    4 – Murder and Terrorism (INTENTIONAL)

    Everyone eventually dies of an illness (Biological Failure), ergo, that leaves us with Accidents and Murder.

    Accidents are unpreventable by the individual, although we have dramatically reduced accidents through standards, legislative regulation, insurance regulation, and training. That leaves us with murder and terrorism.

    Of Murder, nearly all murders occur via known relationship or relative, and are avoidable, and we spend vast resources on legislation, regulation, insurance,and policing to prevent them.

    Terrorism is INTENTIONAL, is UNAVOIDABLE, is NON NEGLIGENT, yet it is PERFECTLY REGULATABLE by eliminating all individuals who demonstrate any affiliation with the organizations or clans that commit terrorism.

    Why is it then that we do not act on the most preventable of methods of death?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 10:50:00 UTC

  • EMPIRES ARE A BAD IDEA. KIN NOT CORPORATION. Empires MUST eventually rely on dip

    EMPIRES ARE A BAD IDEA. KIN NOT CORPORATION.

    Empires MUST eventually rely on diplomacy rather than force. diplomacy must eventually rely on deception rather than truth.

    The only people with whom we share common interest as scale are our kin.

    NATIONS NOT EMPIRES.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 09:24:00 UTC

  • MOST ALL LANGUAGE IS EXCUSE-MAKING People don’t reason to seek the truth, they r

    MOST ALL LANGUAGE IS EXCUSE-MAKING

    People don’t reason to seek the truth, they reason to make excuses for doing what they think is in their interest.

    Language and reason evolved to negotiate in a social order, not to tell or determine the truth.

    Otherwise it would not have taken us x thousand years to develop the scientific method.

    And we would not need the scientific method. Because the entire purpose of the scientific method, is to compensate for the fact that our brains developed to negotiate, not tell the truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:01:00 UTC

  • THE TREASON OF TOLERANCE (ACTION REQUEST: Please go to this facebook page, and w

    THE TREASON OF TOLERANCE

    (ACTION REQUEST: Please go to this facebook page, and write a short, intelligent criticism of the Police using some variation of what I’ve provided here. The police are complicit in treason against the people. Tolerance is Treason. )

    https://www.facebook.com/cheshirepolice/posts/10155546384464015

    THE TREASON OF TOLERANCE

    The Police are your enemy.

    The Government is your enemy.

    The Academy is your enemy.

    What the soviets could not achieve by arms and propaganda, your own government has achieved by arms and propaganda.

    A war of invasion, replacement, and extermination by arms is at least honest. A war of invasion, replacement, and extermination by immigration is merely dishonest.

    The Police are just as complicit in your extermination as the death camp guards were complicit in the war’s extermination. The only difference is, that the Guards did it honestly and the Police do to Treasonously.

    Unfortunately propaganda and falsehoods are cheaper than truth. Just as tolerance of one’s conquest is cheaper than opposition.

    Thankfully the people in the USA still have free speech, free movement, and freedom of arms, and will accomplish there what you can no longer accomplish here in the UK.

    How will it feel to beg the Americans to save you for a third time??? From The Germans twice. From the Soviets the third time. And now from the Post Modernists a fourth time.

    There is a vast difference between Conviction and Convenience. And the tolerance for slow conquest, usurpation, and genocide is merely a convenience, not a conviction.

    And it is a crime against all those who came before you, that made your treasonous tolerance possible, and all those that might have followed you, and cannot, because of your treason of convenience.

    EVERY MAN A SHERIFF OR EVERY MAN A SLAVE

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 09:59:00 UTC

  • THE TREASON OF TOLERANCE (revised and expanded) The Police are your enemy. The G

    THE TREASON OF TOLERANCE

    (revised and expanded)

    The Police are your enemy.

    The Government is your enemy.

    The Academy is your enemy.

    What the soviets could not achieve by arms and propaganda, your own government has achieved by arms and propaganda.

    A war of invasion, replacement, and extermination by arms is at least honest. A war of invasion, replacement, and extermination by immigration is merely dishonest.

    The Police are just as complicit in your extermination as the death camp guards were complicit in the war’s extermination. The only difference is, that the Guards did it honestly and the Police do to Treasonously.

    Unfortunately propaganda and falsehoods are cheaper than truth. Just as tolerance of one’s conquest is cheaper than opposition.

    Thankfully the people in the USA still have free speech, free movement, and freedom of arms, and will accomplish there what you can no longer accomplish here in the UK.

    How will it feel to beg the Americans to save you for a third time??? From The Germans twice. From the Soviets the third time. And now from the Post Modernists a fourth time.

    There is a vast difference between Conviction and Convenience. And the tolerance for slow conquest, usurpation, and genocide is merely a convenience, not a conviction.

    And it is a crime against all those who came before you, that made your treasonous tolerance possible, and all those that might have followed you, and cannot, because of your treason of convenience.

    -Curt Doolittle

    -The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 09:46:00 UTC

  • Truthful Argument With Fictionalists

    “If we are engaging in negotiation or argument, we want to know if we can cooperate with you. We prefer to cooperate with you only because cooperation in the long term is more rewarding than predation in the short term. The strategy of my people is maneuver: speed in adaptation. As such we practice Heroism, Sovereignty(Reciprocity), Contract, and Testimonial Truth. And because Maneuver using Heroism, Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial truth are the most expensive method of cooperation, it is only in our interest to cooperate with you if you can at least participate in Contract and Testimonial Truth. Otherwise, because of our use of Maneuver, by the high costs of Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial Truth, it is preferable to defeat you, kill or enslave, and take from you that which we cannot obtain by cooperation under contract and testimonial truth, rather than pay the unnecessary cost of your violation of contract, and your use of deceit. And so in negotiation and argument, if you cannot practice full reciprocity of sovereignty, and constrain yourself to that which you can testify to, then you are incapable of contract for reciprocal sovereign cooperation. And as such we need not discourse, only fight. So no, when you call upon your gods, you cannot testify to them because you cannot demonstrate them, only lie about them. While, if I call upon reason, I can demonstrate reason, and demonstrate all that follows from my reason, or I would not enter it into sovereign, reciprocal, discourse, negotiation, and debate. So if you rely upon that which you cannot demonstrate, then you cannot testify to it, and therefore you are incapable of truth, and therefore incapable of contract, and for these reasons we must, given no other choice, fight, defeat, kill or enslave, and take from you what we cannot obtain by cooperation.”