Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • THE GREAT AMERICAN LIE by Bill Joslin and Curt Doolittle by Bill Joslin: Jeffers

    THE GREAT AMERICAN LIE

    by Bill Joslin and Curt Doolittle

    by Bill Joslin:

    Jefferson lied.

    The American sentiment of democracy and it’s failure to ensure it’s value is passed down stems from good and true ideas being propted-up by lies.

    Stop lying!

    You are ruled (democracy is NOT the will of the.people) and voting prevents the necessity for violent revolution to purify power.

    A generation before, in England, the noble franchise was expanded to all land holders for one reason only – one last peaceful step before violent revolution.

    American founding fathers were the grandchildren of UK parliamentarians who lost their moral footing due to Cromwell.

    The founding fathers didn’t innovate these ideas as much as refined the argumentation for granddaddy’s wisdom. And they appealed to.morality and religion to do so.

    Now it is failing. Not because the ideas were wrong, but rather because the argumentation was baseless.

    Fix this.

    (Curt has. so advocate for his work to correct your way of life)

    ——-

    by Curt Doolittle

    This argument has been stated as:

    1) The value of democracy is limited to the the via-negativa: throwing the corrupt out (disbanding parliament) by peaceful means of transition.

    2) A republic can choose priorities among a people with common interests, but only markets can choose preferences between people with dissimilar interests.

    3) Majoritarian democracy serves as a monopoly that only increases frustrations between people with dissimilar intersets, as the majority gradually oppresses the minority.

    4) The English “aristocracy of everyone” was merely an excuse for seizing political power from the aristocracy by forcing a supermajority, rather than constructing an exchange, and adding even lower houses of parliament. they created a monopoly from a market between the classes.

    5) The americans created a constitution of natural law by using a house of equal regional aristocracy(senate), and proportional regional property owners (middle class house), only exacerbating the problem. This experiment was a ‘third way’ that sought to restore anglo saxon rule of law (contractualism) among the militia.

    6) The americans iteratively bypassed the state aristocracies by direct voting for the senate, and extended enfranchisement rather than creating a single house. in this sense they attempted to create a monopoly (homogeneous) democracy with the senate mediating differences between states. This served to transfer power to the federal government and away from the states. had this power been limited to exclude all normative, traditional, familial behavior that would have enabled insurer of last resort functions, but instead large immigrant states dominated the others, creating the past and current conflicts.

    7) All of these factors violate the anglo < germanic < aryan reason for european historical successes, which were dependent upon the preservation of individual sovereignty under natural law of tort (property), and individual warranty through service and economic liability, and the use of markets in everything for the purpose of decidability.

    8) The family does scale. There is no limit to Militia <- Military <-King-> judiciary -> parliament(thang) -> people, as long as voluntary association, disassociation are available.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 10:18:00 UTC

  • The Mythos of General Plan Ost

    THE MYTHOS OF NAZI GENERAL PLAN OST All general staffs develop war plans. The war plan to use asymmetric warfare against ukraine was produced somewhere between 2010 and 2012. Every single general staff in the world has hundreds of such plans. They vary from the trivial, to the devious, to the genocidal. That is what general staffs do. Yet these plans are rarely if ever used. The american Plan Red was to conquer canada so that the british couldn’t for example (I know this because they bought my great-grandparents farm to use as an airport in case they needed to put the plan into action. The plans that are currently in the russian (and soviet) archives are horrific, and include nuclear saturation of the west, and rapid movement of artillery and armor through that territory. There are plans to take finland, to take sweden, to defend from china, to take back constantinople. These are not likely to happen, but they are the research and development plans that all general staffs occupy their time with so that they are NEVER in a position of lacking a plan for any possible contingency. Generalplan Ost existed in six only in preliminary versions from January 1940 to the last one dated 23. Dec. 1942 named “Generalsiedlungsplan”. The plan was subject to a continuous ongoing development, and no version of it was ever approved. Further development of the plan was abandoned in 1943. The 2′nd, 3′rd and 4′th versions of the plan have never been found. Their existence and content is only known from other secondary documentary references. In other words, this is more propaganda. As far as I know the general solution was to resettle people in order to prevent communist expansion from the soviets into european spaces where it could threaten germans. Fascism was a reaction to soviet communism. That’s all. Just as russians today want to defend their ‘resettled’ people in eastern europe, (despite the fact that they are despised in every country), the germans wanted to defend their settled peoples, because they had been incrementally civilizing europe through commerce since the beginning of the Hansa league. I never believe anyone’s history. I look at the economics, and the demographics, and search for incentives. People just make excuses to justify seizure of opportunities. And history is nothing but such excuses. The only measure of a people is trust and the technical, and economic velocity that results from it. The measure of any philosophy or ideology is the long term condition of those who practice it.

  • The Mythos of General Plan Ost

    THE MYTHOS OF NAZI GENERAL PLAN OST All general staffs develop war plans. The war plan to use asymmetric warfare against ukraine was produced somewhere between 2010 and 2012. Every single general staff in the world has hundreds of such plans. They vary from the trivial, to the devious, to the genocidal. That is what general staffs do. Yet these plans are rarely if ever used. The american Plan Red was to conquer canada so that the british couldn’t for example (I know this because they bought my great-grandparents farm to use as an airport in case they needed to put the plan into action. The plans that are currently in the russian (and soviet) archives are horrific, and include nuclear saturation of the west, and rapid movement of artillery and armor through that territory. There are plans to take finland, to take sweden, to defend from china, to take back constantinople. These are not likely to happen, but they are the research and development plans that all general staffs occupy their time with so that they are NEVER in a position of lacking a plan for any possible contingency. Generalplan Ost existed in six only in preliminary versions from January 1940 to the last one dated 23. Dec. 1942 named “Generalsiedlungsplan”. The plan was subject to a continuous ongoing development, and no version of it was ever approved. Further development of the plan was abandoned in 1943. The 2′nd, 3′rd and 4′th versions of the plan have never been found. Their existence and content is only known from other secondary documentary references. In other words, this is more propaganda. As far as I know the general solution was to resettle people in order to prevent communist expansion from the soviets into european spaces where it could threaten germans. Fascism was a reaction to soviet communism. That’s all. Just as russians today want to defend their ‘resettled’ people in eastern europe, (despite the fact that they are despised in every country), the germans wanted to defend their settled peoples, because they had been incrementally civilizing europe through commerce since the beginning of the Hansa league. I never believe anyone’s history. I look at the economics, and the demographics, and search for incentives. People just make excuses to justify seizure of opportunities. And history is nothing but such excuses. The only measure of a people is trust and the technical, and economic velocity that results from it. The measure of any philosophy or ideology is the long term condition of those who practice it.

  • Fact and Fiction of Nazi Aryan History

    FROM QUORA —“Leaving racial supremacy theories aside, what is the fact and what is the fiction behind the Nazi version of Aryan history?”—CONTROVERSIAL 1) The Nazi propaganda was absolutely pseudoscientific nonsense. We have to understand that the Nazi program was aesthetic – a sort of secular religion – to inspire people who were utterly hopeless and defeated. It was the most successful pseudo-religious program after Marxism – and it was invented largely to oppose marxism (bolshevism) as was all fascism. So the nazis were speaking in a sort of secular religious prose of nationalism the same way that today’s american and western postmodernists speak in a sort of secular religious prose (“Political Correctness”). These are outright falsehoods, and todays academy (postmodernists) openly admit that they are speaking falsehoods because “all that matters is power, not truth, and truth is a weapon of the aristocracy”. The problem arises when we try to treat these movements with anglo-empirical-legal understanding rather than continental-fictional-philosophical understanding, which is simply religious “fictions” (falsehoods) or political ‘ideologies’. It’s inspirational, like myth and religion, not historical or scientific. 2) HOWEVER, first, the late 19th century archeologists were correct, in that the indo europeans were of Aryan (PIE) origins, and that that origin was in Europe (or at least in Ukraine), and that these people moved westward in waves, and brought with them aryanism (paternal, aristocratic, sky worshipping, expansionary, militaristic, technological) civilization, and that they settled in what is today’s poland, spread, and spread into high (Denmark,German) middle (Celtic), and lower (Ital and Hellenic) civilizations, without major impact on old europe (balkans) who were the first major metalworkers. How do we know? a) neoteny (domestication) (morphology, endocrine expression, personality traits) c) verbal acuity (appears we have been trading spatial for verbal for a long time) b) demographic distribution (very little underclass, if any). c) Selection for long winters, close quarters, indoors. In other words, the dozen or so minor races began local speciation, and the delta is highest in Haplogroup I(nordics), and gentility highest (apparently) in slavs. Manorialism began in today’s Holland in the 7th or 8th century, and served to extend the meritocracy of scandinavians, high germans, and baltics. It spread southward (via the Hajnal line). And the germanic prohibition on capital punishment was eliminated first by romans, but by the 12th century reversed, and capital punishment was aggressively used through the end of the 19th century. The far east and far west achieved higher rates of neoteny, albeit from different generations of homo sapiens sapiens, with greater selection pressure on the most northern peoples. (Something happens with cro-magnon generation and we don’t know yet what that was.) The simple difference of lactose tolerance meant 40% more calories from the same food source for doing nothing, and this, with bronze, wheel, horse, voluntary militia, and Individual Sovereignty is the reason for indo european expansion. The steppe and desert (Tribal peoples) did not go thrugh this process and instead under fertile crescent food production, expanded the underclasses. So the asymmetry of our cultures is due in large part to the differences in selection pressures resulting in asymmetric distribution of classes. In other words, far east and far west reduced underclasses, and everyone else increased them. The difference between far east and far west is western verbal acumen, and easter spatial acumen. The reason for this I think I understand, but is due to the time at which each group left africa.

  • Fact and Fiction of Nazi Aryan History

    FROM QUORA —“Leaving racial supremacy theories aside, what is the fact and what is the fiction behind the Nazi version of Aryan history?”—CONTROVERSIAL 1) The Nazi propaganda was absolutely pseudoscientific nonsense. We have to understand that the Nazi program was aesthetic – a sort of secular religion – to inspire people who were utterly hopeless and defeated. It was the most successful pseudo-religious program after Marxism – and it was invented largely to oppose marxism (bolshevism) as was all fascism. So the nazis were speaking in a sort of secular religious prose of nationalism the same way that today’s american and western postmodernists speak in a sort of secular religious prose (“Political Correctness”). These are outright falsehoods, and todays academy (postmodernists) openly admit that they are speaking falsehoods because “all that matters is power, not truth, and truth is a weapon of the aristocracy”. The problem arises when we try to treat these movements with anglo-empirical-legal understanding rather than continental-fictional-philosophical understanding, which is simply religious “fictions” (falsehoods) or political ‘ideologies’. It’s inspirational, like myth and religion, not historical or scientific. 2) HOWEVER, first, the late 19th century archeologists were correct, in that the indo europeans were of Aryan (PIE) origins, and that that origin was in Europe (or at least in Ukraine), and that these people moved westward in waves, and brought with them aryanism (paternal, aristocratic, sky worshipping, expansionary, militaristic, technological) civilization, and that they settled in what is today’s poland, spread, and spread into high (Denmark,German) middle (Celtic), and lower (Ital and Hellenic) civilizations, without major impact on old europe (balkans) who were the first major metalworkers. How do we know? a) neoteny (domestication) (morphology, endocrine expression, personality traits) c) verbal acuity (appears we have been trading spatial for verbal for a long time) b) demographic distribution (very little underclass, if any). c) Selection for long winters, close quarters, indoors. In other words, the dozen or so minor races began local speciation, and the delta is highest in Haplogroup I(nordics), and gentility highest (apparently) in slavs. Manorialism began in today’s Holland in the 7th or 8th century, and served to extend the meritocracy of scandinavians, high germans, and baltics. It spread southward (via the Hajnal line). And the germanic prohibition on capital punishment was eliminated first by romans, but by the 12th century reversed, and capital punishment was aggressively used through the end of the 19th century. The far east and far west achieved higher rates of neoteny, albeit from different generations of homo sapiens sapiens, with greater selection pressure on the most northern peoples. (Something happens with cro-magnon generation and we don’t know yet what that was.) The simple difference of lactose tolerance meant 40% more calories from the same food source for doing nothing, and this, with bronze, wheel, horse, voluntary militia, and Individual Sovereignty is the reason for indo european expansion. The steppe and desert (Tribal peoples) did not go thrugh this process and instead under fertile crescent food production, expanded the underclasses. So the asymmetry of our cultures is due in large part to the differences in selection pressures resulting in asymmetric distribution of classes. In other words, far east and far west reduced underclasses, and everyone else increased them. The difference between far east and far west is western verbal acumen, and easter spatial acumen. The reason for this I think I understand, but is due to the time at which each group left africa.

  • FROM QUORA —“Leaving racial supremacy theories aside, what is the fact and wha

    FROM QUORA

    —“Leaving racial supremacy theories aside, what is the fact and what is the fiction behind the Nazi version of Aryan history?”—

    CONTROVERSIAL

    1) The Nazi propaganda was absolutely pseudoscientific nonsense. We have to understand that the Nazi program was aesthetic – a sort of secular religion – to inspire people who were utterly hopeless and defeated. It was the most successful pseudo-religious program after Marxism – and it was invented largely to oppose marxism (bolshevism) as was all fascism.

    So the nazis were speaking in a sort of secular religious prose of nationalism the same way that today’s american and western postmodernists speak in a sort of secular religious prose (“Political Correctness”). These are outright falsehoods, and todays academy (postmodernists) openly admit that they are speaking falsehoods because “all that matters is power, not truth, and truth is a weapon of the aristocracy”.

    The problem arises when we try to treat these movements with anglo-empirical-legal understanding rather than continental-fictional-philosophical understanding, which is simply religious “fictions” (falsehoods) or political ‘ideologies’. It’s inspirational, like myth and religion, not historical or scientific.

    2) HOWEVER, first, the late 19th century archeologists were correct, in that the indo europeans were of Aryan (PIE) origins, and that that origin was in Europe (or at least in Ukraine), and that these people moved westward in waves, and brought with them aryanism (paternal, aristocratic, sky worshipping, expansionary, militaristic, technological) civilization, and that they settled in what is today’s poland, spread, and spread into high (Denmark,German) middle (Celtic), and lower (Ital and Hellenic) civilizations, without major impact on old europe (balkans) who were the first major metalworkers.

    How do we know?

    a) neoteny (domestication) (morphology, endocrine expression, personality traits)

    c) verbal acuity (appears we have been trading spatial for verbal for a long time)

    b) demographic distribution (very little underclass, if any).

    c) Selection for long winters, close quarters, indoors.

    In other words, the dozen or so minor races began local speciation, and the delta is highest in Haplogroup I(nordics), and gentility highest (apparently) in slavs.

    Manorialism began in today’s Holland in the 7th or 8th century, and served to extend the meritocracy of scandinavians, high germans, and baltics. It spread southward (via the Hajnal line). And the germanic prohibition on capital punishment was eliminated first by romans, but by the 12th century reversed, and capital punishment was aggressively used through the end of the 19th century.

    The far east and far west achieved higher rates of neoteny, albeit from different generations of homo sapiens sapiens, with greater selection pressure on the most northern peoples. (Something happens with cro-magnon generation and we don’t know yet what that was.)

    The simple difference of lactose tolerance meant 40% more calories from the same food source for doing nothing, and this, with bronze, wheel, horse, voluntary militia, and Individual Sovereignty is the reason for indo european expansion.

    The steppe and desert (Tribal peoples) did not go thrugh this process and instead under fertile crescent food production, expanded the underclasses.

    So the asymmetry of our cultures is due in large part to the differences in selection pressures resulting in asymmetric distribution of classes. In other words, far east and far west reduced underclasses, and everyone else increased them.

    The difference between far east and far west is western verbal acumen, and easter spatial acumen. The reason for this I think I understand, but is due to the time at which each group left africa.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 12:55:00 UTC

  • THE MYTHOS OF NAZI GENERAL PLAN OST All general staffs develop war plans. The wa

    THE MYTHOS OF NAZI GENERAL PLAN OST

    All general staffs develop war plans. The war plan to use asymmetric warfare against ukraine was produced somewhere between 2010 and 2012. Every single general staff in the world has hundreds of such plans. They vary from the trivial, to the devious, to the genocidal. That is what general staffs do. Yet these plans are rarely if ever used. The american Plan Red was to conquer canada so that the british couldn’t for example (I know this because they bought my great-grandparents farm to use as an airport in case they needed to put the plan into action. The plans that are currently in the russian (and soviet) archives are horrific, and include nuclear saturation of the west, and rapid movement of artillery and armor through that territory. There are plans to take finland, to take sweden, to defend from china, to take back constantinople. These are not likely to happen, but they are the research and development plans that all general staffs occupy their time with so that they are NEVER in a position of lacking a plan for any possible contingency.

    Generalplan Ost existed in six only in preliminary versions from January 1940 to the last one dated 23. Dec. 1942 named “Generalsiedlungsplan”.

    The plan was subject to a continuous ongoing development, and no version of it was ever approved.

    Further development of the plan was abandoned in 1943.

    The 2′nd, 3′rd and 4′th versions of the plan have never been found. Their existence and content is only known from other secondary documentary references.

    In other words, this is more propaganda. As far as I know the general solution was to resettle people in order to prevent communist expansion from the soviets into european spaces where it could threaten germans.

    Fascism was a reaction to soviet communism. That’s all.

    Just as russians today want to defend their ‘resettled’ people in eastern europe, (despite the fact that they are despised in every country), the germans wanted to defend their settled peoples, because they had been incrementally civilizing europe through commerce since the beginning of the Hansa league.

    I never believe anyone’s history. I look at the economics, and the demographics, and search for incentives. People just make excuses to justify seizure of opportunities. And history is nothing but such excuses.

    The only measure of a people is trust and the technical, and economic velocity that results from it.

    The measure of any philosophy or ideology is the long term condition of those who practice it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 10:57:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/24/bombshell-fec-records-indicate-hillary-campaign-illegally-laundered-84-million/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-24 19:04:00 UTC

  • Libertarianism’s Self Destruction

    by Luke Weinhagen (better than I have said it) (brilliant) The way (my revelation) hit me was that libertarianism survives/exists by miscategorizing relations. Specifically libertarians interpret commons(cooperation) as commons(conflict) and use property rights(IVP) to attempt to resolve that conflict. In doing so they justify libertarianism’s parasitism of the commons(that can only be generated via cooperation) as defense and that justification requires it not suppress any parasitism of the commons(cooperation) as this would self destruct the ideology. Libertarianism self destructed for me once I recognized this categorization error. (CURT: Luke, this is, the … it’s, pricelessly stated. nice work.)

  • Disapproval, shaming, rallying, as a substitute for argument (conflation of good

    Disapproval, shaming, rallying, as a substitute for argument (conflation of good/bad with true/false ) is gender biased cognitive bias, just as is psychosis/solipsism vs psychopathy/autism. Either make the argument or at least be honest and say you can’t. But don’t waste my time.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 21:03:00 UTC