Curt Doolittle

Theme: Crisis

  • We survived judaism, christianity, and islam. The great civilizations of the egy

    We survived judaism, christianity, and islam. The great civilizations of the egyptians, north africans, persians, anatolians, byzantines, nw indians, and the one-billion murdered by them did not.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-10 00:39:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182093244555055106

    Reply addressees: @FaithGoldy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182092952790867968

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @FaithGoldy Before the jewish, christian, and islamic destruction of all the civilizations of the ancient world, the foundation narrative of western (mediterranean) civilization was Homer, and it was as common a subject of thought as the medieval bible – and to much superior consequence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1182092952790867968

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @FaithGoldy Before the jewish, christian, and islamic destruction of all the civilizations of the ancient world, the foundation narrative of western (mediterranean) civilization was Homer, and it was as common a subject of thought as the medieval bible – and to much superior consequence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1182092952790867968

  • I don’t know if y’all see the convergence happening but world events are marchin

    I don’t know if y’all see the convergence happening but world events are marching to opportunity day.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-09 22:27:00 UTC

  • THE POSTWAR NARRATIVE IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT 1. Prussia was the completion of the

    THE POSTWAR NARRATIVE IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT

    1. Prussia was the completion of the restoration of western civilization to its origins after the roman collapse, Carolingian failure, Church failure, The French Failure b/c of church influence. The British failure b/c of french influence.

    2. French Socialism and Jewish Marxism were a reformation from supernatural religion to pseudoscientific religion to compete with Prussia, Darwin, and finally Nietzsche.

    3. Nazi Germany was an attempt to convert monarchical Prussianism to political prussianism to resist marxism.

    The German upper classes, at least in prussia, and then in broader germany, had been trying to restore western civilization, to its foundations.

    4. The postwar french, jewish, and less so english attempt to end prussianization was successful, largely through thought leadership in pseudoscience by marxists feminists and postmodernists.

    5. I see the current conflict between those of us who are ahead of the curve (again) restoring the prussian aristocratic ethic, the english who are trying to restore the british empire, and the protestants who are trying to restore the church, and the catholics who are in sympathy with the marxists, the underclasses who are the new postmodernists as well as marxists, and the jews and muslims who are seeking to undermine all of the above.

    6. We must restore our aristocracy, our rule of law, our military, our militia, and our family, and we can easily do so by depoliticization, definancialization, and re-familializtion.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-09 13:39:00 UTC

  • THE POSTWAR NARRATIVE IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT 1. Prussia was the completion of the

    THE POSTWAR NARRATIVE IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT

    1. Prussia was the completion of the restoration of western civilization to its origins after the roman collapse, Carolingian failure, Church failure, The French Failure b/c of church influence. The British failure b/c of french influence.

    2. French Socialism and Jewish Marxism were a reformation from supernatural religion to pseudoscientific religion to compete with Prussia, Darwin, and finally Nietzsche.

    3. Nazi Germany was an attempt to convert monarchical Prussianism to political prussianism to resist marxism.

    The German upper classes, at least in prussia, and then in broader germany, had been trying to restore western civilization, to its foundations.

    4. The postwar french, jewish, and less so english attempt to end prussianization was successful, largely through thought leadership in pseudoscience by marxists feminists and postmodernists.

    5. I see the current conflict between those of us who are ahead of the curve (again) restoring the prussian aristocratic ethic, the english who are trying to restore the british empire, and the protestants who are trying to restore the church, and the catholics who are in sympathy with the marxists, the underclasses who are the new postmodernists as well as marxists, and the jews and muslims who are seeking to undermine all of the above.

    6. We must restore our aristocracy, our rule of law, our military, our militia, and our family, and we can easily do so by depoliticization, definancialization, and re-familializtion.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-09 09:29:00 UTC

  • RT @RickTurpin33: @curtdoolittle The effects of a dark age and are we in another

    RT @RickTurpin33: @curtdoolittle The effects of a dark age and are we in another dark age right now? (Has insight into how Germanic tribal…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 18:09:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181632787654291458

  • RT @curtdoolittle: DEPLATFORMING? HOW ABOUT DEPLATFORMING FROM WESTERN CIVILIZAT

    RT @curtdoolittle: DEPLATFORMING? HOW ABOUT DEPLATFORMING FROM WESTERN CIVILIZATION?
    That’s what’s going to happen. And it’s accelerating d…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 17:35:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181624275716968449

  • NO SPENGLER IS WRONG. TOO MUCH MIDDLE EAST, NOT ENOUGH CHINA AND INDIA —“Someb

    NO SPENGLER IS WRONG. TOO MUCH MIDDLE EAST, NOT ENOUGH CHINA AND INDIA

    —“Somebody like Spengler would say that there is no way around the decline and eventual fall of the Faustian West, no matter what we do politically. What if like an individual human life, and indeed the universe itself, an expiration date is just destiny?”—

    He’s demonstrably wrong. China and india are the examples,

    The problem for most western intellectuals is that fertile crescent begins both the agrarian and bronze ages, and that we were behind them because we didn’t have that climate with those rivers, and so agrarian production had to be distributed over broader colder territories.

    I can envision history now without semitic influences and the semitic dark ages of ignorance.

    The problem is we let our civilizations partly merge when rome was conquered by byzantium (se europeans, anatolians and syrians and levantines) and so almost all out intellectuals are infected by the european semitic competition rather than studying europe, semitia, india, and china as different models.

    The Chinese have always been right.

    Homogeneity. gradual genetic colonization. Isolation. and eradication of any and all competition.

    We failed because when we moved from land trade through the Bosporus, to the age of sail, we didn’t put a wall at gibraltar, the Bosporus, the caucuses, and between the caspian, the aral sea, and the himalayas.

    We didn’t wall ourselves off like the chinese.

    Civilizations and territories, and SPECIES: china, India, europa (to the urals), semitia, africa, austronesia, north and south america, and australia.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 13:26:00 UTC

  • I don’t see any evidence that we are not returning to civilizational empires gov

    I don’t see any evidence that we are not returning to civilizational empires governed by core states, with a multitude of polities within them, necessitated out of military and commercial (trade) power, with decivilized a warfare, and european flexibility in futures is gone.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:36:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181322466603470849

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181317477692772353

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LLaddon I stated a general rule of arbitrary precision, which of necessity describes a distribution, and you are trying to create a tail (Outlier) claiming that the general rule is false??? Pick a territory. Try to obtain it. I’ve done it. I’ve done wargames. All else is fiction.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181317477692772353

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LLaddon I stated a general rule of arbitrary precision, which of necessity describes a distribution, and you are trying to create a tail (Outlier) claiming that the general rule is false??? Pick a territory. Try to obtain it. I’ve done it. I’ve done wargames. All else is fiction.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181317477692772353

  • 1 Year AgoEric Danelaw updated his status.Oct 7, 2018, 8:47 PM–“People have bee

    1 Year AgoEric Danelaw updated his status.Oct 7, 2018, 8:47 PM–“People have been saying society’s been in decline since the late 1800’s. This is nothing new.”–

    Well, that’s rather dim witted, because it HAS been in decline since the late 1800’s and the introduction of Marxism as a revolt against Darwin, Maxwell, and the Industrial Revolution.

    The underclass has been growing. We have lost almost a full standard deviation in ability. We have lost the intergenerational family, we have lost marriage. We have traded financialism and consumerism for the civil society. We have been displaced by the underclasses.

    Ergo, society has been in decline.

    It HAS been in decline since the late 1800’s.

    Why is that hard to comprehend?Updated Oct 7, 2019, 11:24 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 11:24:00 UTC

  • 1 Year AgoEric Danelaw updated his status.Oct 7, 2018, 9:12 PMNeither of the iss

    1 Year AgoEric Danelaw updated his status.Oct 7, 2018, 9:12 PMNeither of the issues Stiglitz mentions will make any difference because the problem we face is (a) human capital is no longer in reserve in europe, but underperforming from the third world, (b) we have concentrated all growth in a few immigrant cities that are all on the edge of bankruptcy, and these are so expensive they have become ovary graveyards; and (c) proximity creates hostility because of signaling competition and cannot be fixed. There is no reason that what failed in levantine/semitic civilization will not fail here in western civilization. (d) the reason that we are in decline is reproductive redistribution downward and a continuous drop in human capital because of it, and this is caused by (e) the consumption of all income produced the the addition of women into the workforce by taxation and redistribution to said underclasses, and (f) the financialization of the economy wherein trillions are extracted from working families but not under and upper classes, thereby creating the reproductive redistribution. On top of that (g) unions caused the industrial, technological, and job flight. GM alone is priced out of the market by intergenerational rents that cannot possibly be paid, and should never have been tolerated as a legal obligation.

    I can’t even believe he’s dishonest and incompetent enough to even make those two nonsense arguments.

    Hence why I write so much about economic pseudoscience, particularly via Krugman, Stiglitz, and DeLong.

    I am fairly sure they know what evil they do, and they do it precisely because it is evil.Updated Oct 7, 2019, 11:24 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 11:24:00 UTC