Theme: Crisis

  • Oct 22, 2019, 9:59 PM

    https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/lawrence-solomon-if-alberta-turns-separatist-the-rest-of-canada-is-in-big-trouble?fbclid=IwAR0ic5UU_zSrQJNhCnAj8uUMWzKpQx57qP6cZ8giGstTBCVK6ZwJN-4wSPsUpdated Oct 22, 2019, 9:59 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 21:59:00 UTC

  • “NOTHING ELSE REALLY DEFINES ALTERNATIVES WITH ACTIONABLE SOLUTIONS.” (worth rep

    “NOTHING ELSE REALLY DEFINES ALTERNATIVES WITH ACTIONABLE SOLUTIONS.”

    (worth repeating)

    —“Millenials and Gen Z are mad that we have no community, society, fair ratio of marriageable women, reason to invest at all. Most of us would trade what we have now for communism, anarchy or any number of flawed systems.

    Philosophically speaking, fight club or the joker are more compelling than most or the abstract appeals pitched at us in the past 50 years. Except for P. Nothing else really defines or offers appealing alternatives with actionable solutions.”— @[100027748725265:2048:GL Sevier]Updated Oct 22, 2019, 11:22 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 11:22:00 UTC

  • The Superpower is gone with the restoration of normalcy in the post-communist er

    The Superpower is gone with the restoration of normalcy in the post-communist era – world powers are returning, and in doing so the world returns to normal. Every civlization has a core state. Core states are wealthiest and most powerful, and they constrain the actions of their civlizational members. India is a civilization, and china is a civilization, neither are countries, they are centrally managed civilizations, which is an advantage for a poor numerous people and a disadvantage for a wealthy people. I hope we are successful in preventing a world islamic power that we must fight like the world communist powers. We are still in the west fighting our own internal enemies in the financial, academy, state system. It is a mistake to think of the world as countries any longer


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 09:09:00 UTC

  • RT @TulsiGabbard: Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers

    RT @TulsiGabbard: Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 13:59:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185918561375735809

  • THE ORIGINS OF THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST WESTERN CIVILIZATION? —“The prob

    THE ORIGINS OF THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST WESTERN CIVILIZATION?

    —“The problem came from the continental counter-enlightenment.”— Martin Štěpán

    Correct.

    Or stated more completely, it came from french counter-enlightenment (Rousseau – that’s who really starts it), german counter- enlightenment (schopenhauer-feeling, Kant-Reason [to preserve faith], Hegel-idealism ), and jewish counter-enlightenment: marx (material conflict – pseudoscience), and once mark-lenin-stalin-mao failed, then finally, back to France and the second french counter-enligthenment with Derrida-et-al.

    So these are all statements of ‘belief’ – attempts to create a secular theology. They are psychological or internal systems of thought written in unscientific (untestifiable) but instead literary prose (what I correctly call sophism and pseudoscience ).

    If you read the british enlightenment it is limited to ACTION science, technology, and law (testimony). If you read the scottish enlightenment, smith(utility) and hume(realism, naturalism, empiricism), we apprehend the world correctly within limits of our senses and can extend our senses through instrumentation, and morality is achieved through enlightened self interest – and especially at scale, between nations, is achieved through trade rather than autarky.

    In other words, Realism, Naturalism, Empiricism, Operationalism (techne), Rational Choice(utilitarian)- given to emotional variation, Natural Law (cooperation by reciprocity), and Economics (morality through cooperation and trade).

    The french and german and jewish are not only false but childish by comparison, and the theological not only false and childish but but harmful by comparison.

    1. The market demand for personal mindfulness (Spiritualism) whether empathic-femining (theological), moral-masculine(rational), or analytic-masculine(scientific) exists, and all three demands exist for most of us. The question is, given how the various religions solved mindfulness (Stoicism-epicureanism, buddhism, hinduism, abrahamism) which produces agency (stoicism), which produces optimism (hinduism), which produces withdrawal from reality (buddhism) and which denies and escapes reality (abrahamism).

    2. Religions must provide interpersonal mindfulness by creating a standard dialog, set of signals, and manners that are costly to learn and practice, but that by practicing display to others you are worthy of honest cooperation on the same terms.

    3. Religions must also provide social mindfulness (limitation of fear and comfort in the ethical, and moral. These are moral rules that serve the group’s competitive strategy – and all reflect the environmental challenges of the age of transformation in which men invented religions.,

    4. Religions must also provide political mindfulness (limits on political action and on rulers actions). I won’t cover each of them here.

    5. Religions must also provide a group strategy – gypsy parasitism, jewish parasitism, muslim parasitism, predation and conquest, christian undermining of the truth, knowledge, reason, law, property, aristocracy by rallying the peasantry and women and slaves against all and being as expansionary as islam – to counter islam. Buddhist submission and obedience Hindu class duty and function in the ‘harmony’. Chinese hierarchical family (bureaucracy). Anglo aristocratic egalitarianism (entrepreneurship and corporation).

    So 1. personal mindfulness (peace of mind), 2. interpersonal, 3. social, 4. political, 5. strategic.

    All of these are served by training in stoicism and epicureanism(realism, naturalism, reciprocity, living within your means, surrounding yourself with family and friends, and insulation from competitive status signaling), training interpersonal reciprocity, social reciprocity, training in political reciprocity, and training in group strategic reciprocity.

    The fact that we train people in reading, writing, arithmetic, mathematics, and the sciences, and indoctrinate them into falsehoods of marxism (class undermining), feminism(male undermining), and postmodernism (group undermining), but DON”T train them in stoic mindfulness, epicurean happiness, basic money, household finance, and accounting, basic law of contract and reciprocity, the testimony, the grammars, logics, rhetoric, and produce holidays that celebrate our seasons and heroes, thinkers, and sants is just a choice.

    The only addiction christianity adds is the transformation of western paternalism of masculine aristocracy, to the feminine submission to a false god, the pretense of equality of all, and the one good thing: the feminine emulation of jesus in the extension of forgiveness instead of semitic hypersensitivity to insult and slight – we call this christian love. It’s just self virtue signaling in exchange for immunity from offense by petty people endemic among the desperate, poor and ignorant.

    The real reason people rely on abrahamic religion is to disintermediate themselves from others status signals so that theyc an preserve mindfulness and self image despite continuous rejection. The reason we want to live in thd christian world is because we are not subject to continuous rejection but continuous tolerance and forgiveness (love).

    The program of the marxists, feminists, and postmodernists, is to UNDERMINE christian love from within. Undermine the faith. Undermine the ethics Generate envy and hatred between genders, classes, and identity groups, in order to sew discord that creates demand for an authoritarian state which can extract almost unlimited income from the population to resolve the conflicts that the government created.

    This is all you need to understand about (a) religion, (b) christianity in politics (c) how we can state christianity in legal terms, (d) how we can teach stoicism and epicureanism and history and truth rather than semitic lies, and (e) how we are undermined because christians will not fight the enemy.

    Christians are our weakness. We ‘masculine pagans’ would fight today – but we need christian numbers.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 18:26:00 UTC

  • Add a hostile excitable minority practicing systematic undermining of western ci

    Add a hostile excitable minority practicing systematic undermining of western civilization and you get the scenario we just saw in the video.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 17:01:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185601999221481474

    Reply addressees: @renewmeme @jim_rutt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185601619129458689


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @renewmeme @jim_rutt Combine with Infantilization of males in education, the lower testosterone of lower middle and upper proletarian classes, and indoctrination into pseudoscience,sophism and denialism in the university and we see this kind of behavior from women, and pseudo-males defend them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1185601619129458689


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @renewmeme @jim_rutt Combine with Infantilization of males in education, the lower testosterone of lower middle and upper proletarian classes, and indoctrination into pseudoscience,sophism and denialism in the university and we see this kind of behavior from women, and pseudo-males defend them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1185601619129458689

  • RT @jim_rutt: Civil War 2 is coming if people continue to spin up in violation o

    RT @jim_rutt: Civil War 2 is coming if people continue to spin up in violation of 3500 years of Indo-European standards of hospitality. htt…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 15:26:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185578081756553216

  • QUESTION: —“Curt I have a question for you. Do you think that there is any pos

    QUESTION: —“Curt I have a question for you. Do you think that there is any possibility of a tyrant getting in charge of the USA should it descend into civil war for separation? Or do we think this can be done by democratic processes in place? The latter one I think realistically doesn’t have a chance.”—

    There is a possibility of democratic process *IF* we propose a solution that is a superior alternative to certain conflict. This is what I hope to do. But the public won’t accept that until the conflict is certain. Which will happen soon.

    Any democrat is by definition a tyrant, because any rule by legislation rather than rule by law of reciprocity is by definition despotism.

    My hope, and most probable is a military takeover of the government. The problem is that the military needs something to enforce. So we must provide them with the market demand (up rising), moral license (to prevent chaos and civil war), and solution (that they can enforce to maintain the peace).

    We will need to act before the election. That’s all I can tell you. And that is why I’m working so hard to get enough done to provide that solution – at the last minute.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 17:21:00 UTC

  • 7) I don’t make errors. Don’t bother trying to refute it. Try to understand it.

    7) I don’t make errors. Don’t bother trying to refute it. Try to understand it. Belt Tightening will come either by the restoration of nationalism, capital accumulation, and economic and political eugenics or it will come from collapse.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 14:01:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184107076148191233

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184106639416287232


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 6) And in doing so created scarcity of the very goods you seek to hyper-consume. Humans are not insulated from the laws of physics and our productivity, particularly by the consumption of hydrocarbons, not as the liberals presumed – infinite. Welcome to consequences you created.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184106639416287232


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 6) And in doing so created scarcity of the very goods you seek to hyper-consume. Humans are not insulated from the laws of physics and our productivity, particularly by the consumption of hydrocarbons, not as the liberals presumed – infinite. Welcome to consequences you created.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184106639416287232

  • 5) And we have no choice but to defeat genetic and economic red queens. Why? Dem

    5) And we have no choice but to defeat genetic and economic red queens. Why? Demographics is destiny. Your hyperconsumption has expanded the world underclass, reversing thousands of years of human domestication (economic and political eugenics).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 13:58:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184106189665329153

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184105849666584577


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 4) But cooperative necessity in social orders, like gravity in physical orders, is inescapable – and resistance is expected but ultimately futile. Your mistake is confusing PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And confusing OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184105849666584577


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 4) But cooperative necessity in social orders, like gravity in physical orders, is inescapable – and resistance is expected but ultimately futile. Your mistake is confusing PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And confusing OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184105849666584577