Theme: Crisis

  • DO NOT HAVE UNTIL 2024 – ITS GO YEAR (Watch from the current time) Jan 31, 2020,

    https://youtu.be/4FJPpLplwhk?t=1737WE DO NOT HAVE UNTIL 2024 – ITS GO YEAR

    (Watch from the current time)

    https://youtu.be/4FJPpLplwhk?t=1737Updated Jan 31, 2020, 6:10 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 06:10:00 UTC

  • HAS THE INTERNET MADE A DIFFERENCE IN THREAT PERCEPTION? —“Is anything differe

    HAS THE INTERNET MADE A DIFFERENCE IN THREAT PERCEPTION?

    —“Is anything different now — or has the internet just made us more AWARE of how the left rolls? For instance … if we were to apply our current knowledge of history to the standard history textbook of the 1980s, we would say “this is intolerable.” Or if we applied current understanding of inter-sexual dynamics to the dating marketplace of the 1990s (peak friendzone) we would say “this is intolerable.”—Michael Churchill

    Great question. A three part answer (a) yes we are more aware (b) we cannot threaten, argue with, silence, or exit them – because our interpersonal physicality and genetic status is invisible and inaccessible on the web – so GSRRM is more effective than physicality (c) yes they are a greater threat demographically because they think they can win (caused by obama)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 11:01:00 UTC

  • A life of solving this category of thought: civilizational crisis -requires we f

    A life of solving this category of thought: civilizational crisis -requires we forgo most other forms of consumption into a stoic, epicurean, and spartan devotion of our lives exclusively to calculation by means of internal interpersonal and group argument: evolution by survival from competition. It is a costly means of obtaining immortality. But it is one of the only means of doing so. πŸ˜‰ And once you transcend the animal it is one of the most rewarding.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 10:37:00 UTC

  • CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN STRATEGY AND CONFLICT (very important) (summary) (

    CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN STRATEGY AND CONFLICT

    (very important) (summary)

    (Warning: This is the most important subject of our age, but it might trigger (offend) you so please move on if having your sacred cows slaughtered by science is unacceptable.)

    Pre-marine-trade Europeans like all other peoples didn’t have writing – few people did. Writing requires the evolution of debt-trade and taxation. The population density of territorial regions, the rate of production of territorial areas, and the cost of political control, all inhibit it, which is why the river valleys and the coasts developed writing.

    The europeans like all people, had oral history. Although it is most interesting that the europeans seem to have invented history as we understand it. The Atlantics, the Mediterraneans, the indo europeans, the beaker people, the Germanics, and certainly the Celts had oral history and had an industry for training their priesthood.

    The jews had history, and didn’t write it down, because of the prestige of memorizing it (just like europeans), and only wrote it down under advice, question, or command of the greeks. Like the dictionary froze english spelling, writing froze jewish, then christian, then islamic dogma. This isn’t the same for european, Indian, or Chines thought which was advice (wisdom literature) not command (authoritarian literature).

    Besides the universal lying and face before truth of the semitic tribal peoples, and this authoritarian literature, the middle east developed jewish pilpul and critique (lying) and muslim recitation and stagnation (avoidance of adaptation).

    The Chinese pursued harmony of their wisdom literature which limited their adaptation, and they followed sun tzu in war by delay and deceit, and their culture followed.

    The Iranic branch in India (Hindus) could not (as is happening to Americans) rule such a vast population of lower classes, and so chose a corporeal organization of class roles – a military organization familiar to the iranics, replicating the class structure of warriors, priests, and workers, each with different responsibilities.

    The Chinese had chosen hierarchical family, and europeans had chosen a hierarchical military.

    The Jewish-Palestinian-Arab semites chose universal resistance to all forms of aristocracy including the Egyptian by the adoption of universal slave resistance as a strategy.

    This failure to produce a durable military still plagues the jewish- Palestinian and less so Arab (raiding) peoples today. The jews in particular because they have neither the ethical tradition of land holders (and cant hold land) nor the ethical tradition of a working class (who fight) or an ethical tradition of a market between the elites. Which is why we wanted to move all jews to Israel, making a Netherlands of the middle east that may drag the primitive peoples out of authoritarian monopoly slave-resistance into market modernity – AND insulate us from jewish and muslim undermining at the same time.

    The Chinese strategy of course is to eradicate islam by incremental domestication of the muslim people and prohibiting entry of the jewish people. There is no force in Asia that can compete with Chinese domestication of other peoples. They have been doing it for thousands of years.

    The Europeans, having conquered the continent by military and technological means, had the pressure of a small population using maneuver, adaptation, technology, and a universal voluntary and therefore entrepreneurial military to produce a hierarchy – and produced as a consequence an entrepreneurial wisdom literature of markets including technology(science), law, philosophy, theology that competed with one another under their only immutable strategy – the sovereignty of the entrepreneurial warrior.

    Europeans maneuver, adapt, and invent with small number , Chinese resist and defeat by delay and deceive using numbers, semites deceive seduce with false promise and undermine and weaken – and the muslims consume and destroy, and Indians ignore because they are unconquerable by other than a cancer like islam – and get temporarily conquered by every passing malcontent even if they have the most beautiful of cultures and religions for the average person (except for the filth and irresponsibility for the commons).

    So as usual, when comparing civilizations we don’t disambiguate the truth-telling-empirical races, from the delay and deceive races, from the lying races – which is the entire purpose of my work.

    Ending abrahamic method of lying by jewish, christian, muslim generation-one theology, and marxism, cultural marxism, postmodern, feminism, denialism, by abrahamic generation-two pseudoscience and sophism.

    Because lying – especially baiting into hazard and undermining, are (empirically) easier and more profitable, as we can see from financial, insurance, gambling, advertising, media, entertainment, pornography, ad education – all of which allow undermining host peoples by false promise, absent warranty, under claims of plausible deniability of innocence.

    Which is where the Ashkenazi Jews have specialized: in every single form of profiting by false promise, baiting into hazard, – because that is the group strategy, just like every other group strategy I’ve mentioned above.

    And this is why the Ashkenazi were the most literate people in Europe but contributed absolutely nothing to thought, politics, law, technology, medicine, science, or arts until baited into the franchise in exchange for adopting european Aristotelian if not christian ethics – and failed.

    And its why they were kicked out of Egypt and every other host civilization; why they lost their territory and were dispersed, and why they have been systematically removed from every host population once they become intolerable by achieving critical mass of influence on the people and can no longer deny their strategy.

    This is the scientific basis of the conflict of civilizations including the conflict between jewish and muslim civilizations and EVERY OTHER civlization on this earth.

    Yet no matter what opportunity every people give the jews and muslims the outcome is the same – neither jews nor muslims adapt. Because that is the nature of their authoritarian monopoly parasitic group strategy: slave resistance that preys on the social and economic orders of aristocratic meritocratic people until they are reduced to genetic, institutional, political, cultural, normative, economic and military ruin – it is the strategy of uncontrolled dysgenic growth used by cancers. And the only ‘cure’ for this method of deceit is the light of truth and the law to punish it in a via-negativa market for the continuous suppression of profit by plausible deniability of accountability.

    The worst you can say about europeans is that we dragged humanity out of tyranny, rent seeking, free riding, deceit, ignorance, superstition, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of an uncaring nature – but could have done it better.

    That’s the worst you can say. That is not the worst we can say for the semitic dark ages and 1billion dead in the ancient world, and 100M dead in just this past century and a half, and we still are not ‘cured’ of this second attempt at another semitic dark age.

    We have domesticated and Germanicized Christianity – but we must make it impossible for the Jews and Muslims to create another dark age for mankind.

    My hope is that we cure both physical and informational cancers in this century. And I’m doing my part for the latter by extending the law to prohibit these forms of crime. That is the sole purpose of my work. To prohibit, reverse, and perform restitution for the crimes against civilization by the use of abrahamic methods of deceit- so that we may continue mankind’s transcendence into the gods we imagined.

    People have very little agency. We are trial and error gene computers with firmware that imitates others, evolving software for no purpose other than negotiation with others – and what little agency we have is determined by the limits of whatever it is we learn by imitation and negotiation.

    Very, very, few of us transcend the animal from semi-consciousness to consciousness. The result of doing so – is love for man like we love our domesticated animals, pets, and children. “all we can do is help them. we are too few to do much else.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 09:10:00 UTC

  • CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGE

    CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC

    For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire.

    Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire: experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards.

    Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).

    What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both.

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.

    The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic, social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs.

    So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:43:00 UTC

  • CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGE

    CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC

    For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire.

    Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire:experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards.

    Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).

    What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both.

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.

    The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic,social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs.

    So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:42:00 UTC

  • 2) The chinese didn’t ‘do this to their people’, instead they failed to act quic

    2) The chinese didn’t ‘do this to their people’, instead they failed to act quickly because of fear of punishment from Beijing (as usual). 3) My concern is the ongoing soft warfare duplicating that of the soviets against our research sectors, and the same against our economy.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 23:32:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222301563357712384

    Reply addressees: @party_blanket

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222301118329344001


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @party_blanket 1) We have at least four competing theories making the rounds. These two theories can be intercausal – or not. Either one can be the cause – or not. However, the chinese are researching bioweapons, and (as NPR is reporting) the smuggling of the coronavirus did happen.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1222301118329344001


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @party_blanket 1) We have at least four competing theories making the rounds. These two theories can be intercausal – or not. Either one can be the cause – or not. However, the chinese are researching bioweapons, and (as NPR is reporting) the smuggling of the coronavirus did happen.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1222301118329344001

  • 1) We have at least four competing theories making the rounds. These two theorie

    1) We have at least four competing theories making the rounds. These two theories can be intercausal – or not. Either one can be the cause – or not. However, the chinese are researching bioweapons, and (as NPR is reporting) the smuggling of the coronavirus did happen.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 23:31:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222301118329344001

    Reply addressees: @party_blanket

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222299267148197891


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222299267148197891

  • ARREST OF PROFESSOR CHARLES M. LIEBER China Virus Update via Alexander Brown fro

    ARREST OF PROFESSOR CHARLES M. LIEBER

    China Virus Update via Alexander Brown from NPR

    (Context: coronavirus stolen from Canadian labs and weaponized)

    The arrest of Charles M. Lieber by US authorities may cue us in how the Chinese possibly came by their coronaviral weaponisation. Accordingly, we note the following:

    [ 1 ]. Chinese BIOWEAPON agent Xiangguo Qiu helped steal and smuggle coronavirus from Canada’s level 4 NML National Microbiology Laboratory. She was investigated by the RCMP Royal Canadian Mounted Police and sacked from NML in 2019.

    [ 2 ]. Charles M. Lieber, Chairman of Harvard’s Chemistry Department, SECRETLY established a research laboratory at China’s WUT Wuhan University of Technology and LIED to investigating United States authorities about it. He very likely applied his knowledge and experience in chemistry + nanotechnology at this laboratory.

    [ 3 ]. Lieber’s arrest at THIS time of the coronaviral scourge.

    Lieber contracted with WUT in lieu of China’s TTP Thousand Talents Program. The TTP was for espionage, given the concern of relevant US counterintelligence / espionage. But so also was China’s program under Qiu in Canada for which her students were promptly re-assigned during her abrupt bar / prohibition* from the level 4 NML in 2019.

    At the time Qiu was barred from the NML, she was said to have been in “policy breach”. At the time, the suspicion was about the improper transfer of intellectual property aka ‘theft and smuggle’ ( from Canada to China of coronavirus ).

    We know that coronavirus ( SOURCED to NML via scientific director Frank Plummer, from Fouchier of Erasmus Medical Center, the Netherlands, from Dr. Ali Mohammed Zaki in Egypt, from the 60 year old Jeddah patient ) was STOLEN from Canada’s level 4 NML and smuggled to China, specifically Wuhan province. With the Wuhan coronaviral ACCIDENT = SPILL, Qiu and Lieber may be two significant dots worth investigating then.

    China very likely spilled this BIOWEAPON. It attempted first to mob the leak on the quiet, without informing the global partners and or the WHO World Health Organisation. When it failed, China made frantic efforts at transparency and emergency response.

    Were China bio testing this agent on its population, it would have done so differently. But then, it could as well be that the Chinese were bio testing 2019 – nCoV.

    Biotesting?

    This far there is no reported death of a non Chinese. Could it be that the world caught on with the Chinese 2019 – nCoV bio testing, and China is being held to responsibility to ensure non Chinese mortality? Or that post exposure measures are adequate to prevent mortality of infected non Chinese?

    Note though that this scourge would soon be contained. For very obvious reasons.

    https://www.npr.org/…/acclaimed-harvard-scientist-is-arrest…

    Alexander. January 28, 2020. 2137 GMT.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 17:13:00 UTC

  • QUESTION? —“Will people rise up before it’s too late?”— If you got a call to

    QUESTION?

    —“Will people rise up before it’s too late?”—

    If you got a call today from me or someone like me, to show up in a certain town at a certain date would you go? Would you have gone five years ago? Would you go today? Will you go in 90 days?

    If the answer to that question is anything other than “I’ll show up” then you’re the f–king problem, so shut the f—k up.

    If the answer is “I’ll show up”, then we win.

    There is nothing in the world that can stop 100k.

    We are the largest army in the world.

    But only if hand-wringers show up.

    If you won’t show up then shut up.

    πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 15:31:00 UTC