Curt Doolittle

Theme: Crisis

  • “Do you think people will ever stand up to the current tyranny in America? I am

    —“Do you think people will ever stand up to the current tyranny in America? I am worried that people will talk about it and talk about it and never stand up completely. It is one thing to rally but an entirely different thing to take up arms.”–Brandon Williams

    1) If you asked this question five years ago, and you ask this question this month, what reaction would you expect?

    I did. People called me nuts. Today people just ask when.

    2) If you got a call today from me or someone like me, to show up in a certain town at a certain date would you go? Would you have gone five years ago? Would you go today? Will you go in 90 days?

    If the answer to that question isn’t “I’ll show up” then you’re the f–king problem so shut the f—k up.

    If the answer is “I’ll show up”, then we win.

    There is nothing in the world that can stop 100k of us.

    We are the largest army in the world.

    But only if hand-wringers show up.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 15:05:00 UTC

  • CHOOSE, A SECOND FALL OF ROME, OR THE CARTHAGINIAN WAR? (important) (core) 1) So

    CHOOSE, A SECOND FALL OF ROME, OR THE CARTHAGINIAN WAR?

    (important) (core)

    1) So will you go down in history as the second fall of Rome? Or will you go down as Rome defeating Carthage and salting the earth so it can never rise again?

    2) I think of racists as solving the obvious problem by the simplest means that they can imagine – but one that easily fails. People’s sensitivity changes under duress. So you must increase duress in order to reduce their tolerance to threats. This is how a general thinks about a strategic problem. Minimum force here, to cause minimum resistance there, for maximum consequence over there,

    3) P was purely conservative libertarian. Race based people came to P when I stated that the science is clear that the optimum social order is ethnocentrism, the optimum political order rule of law, and the optimum ethic christian because it is compatible and enhances via negativa natural law into a via-positiva advantage. In P I didn’t even consider race as a motivator. I just stated that if you want a wealthy, competitive, commons producing, highly redistributive, high trust polity that continues the western tradition you need to restore the market for polities with rule of law and many small polities each producing commons needed by that body of people given the differences in our abilities, rates, and depths of maturity and genetic load.

    4) If you search my site you will find (a) a decade of my argument stating that conflict is largely one of the primacy of loyalty to kin because of the advantage of kin cooperation, with the problem being differences in class sizes between the races and tribes, with whites and east asians producing the best genetic distribution with the least genetic load (bad genes). And (b) that the primary conflict is one over natural status conflicts given the differing demands for commons – including that of normative behavior – between different groups with different rates and depths of sexual matureity and different class sizes. So my argument was that ending segregation was not only a catastrophic failure, not only destroyed the nascent black middle class leadership, but forced the abandonment of the black underclass. This is not dissimilar to the hispanic-indian-black divide in south america (that like mexico at its core is often still amerindian).

    5) I think sh-t thru. So I am aware that all political movements move from the fringe where they depend on very radical very dissatisfied, and often mentally troubled individuals, through ‘generatons’ until they reach enough people to obtain power. I have done the same with P by attacking and undermining the jewish libertarians, then providing a home for the hard right while undermining the swastika ideology and replacing it with the hard science of economics and biology, and I have been working on neutralizing the feminism of the christian right that like women operates under the pretense of needing their approval on their terms, rather than that they need a means of survival and competition in the generations to come but that christianity is scientifically ‘right’ as far as christian ethics – and that I have an answer to the institutionalization of that ethic by embodying it in law. At present john and I together took a gamble last year (and I risked the whole movement) that we could move directly to the revolutionary message, and eventually an anti-left constitutional convention, from there to the certain threat of civil war, while trump was still in office. Right now I think we have to demonstrate (YET AGAIN) that I am right, and that it is with science, reason, evidence, and the law, expressed in our rights to self determination, and to state openly and truthully the superiority of our civilization, and its rescue of man. And that we need to correctly identify the enemy as the financial and political sector. and that the returns on ‘correcting past crimes’ will produce a renaissance not only for our people but for the world and for mankind – or else another dark age. If we do this successfully, there will be no resistance from even the middle, and only resistance from the political and financial sector and hard leftists, and dependent immigrants. How we conduct that war is something I am absolutely confident in and know how to win. It is actually a matter of choosing a strategy from the number I have in my head. All of them will produce such horrific pressure not only on our government but on the rest of the world, that it will be increasingly hard for anyone other than our unwanted immigrants in blue cities and the new mexico-invasion, that to resist the solution. That solution will provide a peaceful transitional means while preserving the strength of the military and the continental defense. Conversely, with resistance we would make a certain union general’s destruction of the south, and isis’ destruction of Syria/Iraq look like a visit from father christmas. (Just one example. What would Mexico do if certain things started happening? What would the largest military base in the states be occupied with? This is how you strategically think about war. Small pressures that create large pressures from elsewhere.)

    6) “All who bleed with me will be my brother in war.” After war, we will naturally sort by our kin as all people do when advantageous, and try to ‘associate or mate upward or downward’ to capture better opportunities if the kin group is not in your interest. The objective being obtaining the ability to voluntarily associate or disassociate as our preference demands. So my understanding is that:

    (a) all of us who want to be left alone so to speak to build a middle class majority polity will get a long just fine as long as we can separate into polities or neighborhoods;

    (b) if we limit our political order to those people wanting a middle class majority polity, then the racial differences will largely ameliorate because most differences that cause conflict are the difference in class sizes between the races on the one hand, and the group strategy of other tribes, races, sub-races being destructive on the other.

    (c) therefore given the vast demographic differences between the races we would end up with a very white polity with minorities, all whom agree to rule of law, and all whom operate under rule of law. And if we can produce commons suitable to our kin we will be fine. I suspect that over time we will re-sort into small nation states if only to limit competition.

    (d) the only problem then is really eliminating falsehood and irreciprocity and letting market forces do their thing., Why? We (and some east asians) appear to be the only people who can do it.

    We could have fixed this politically in 92 at the latest. Now we have to fix it militarily, and this is our last chance to do it before the second fall of the roman empire.

    So will you go down in history as the second fall of Rome? Or will you go down as Rome defeating Carthage and salting the earth so it can never rise again?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 11:09:00 UTC

  • China Steal Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponize It? Sun, 01/26/2020 – 10:11 by

    https://t.co/7qpDNNmqk7Did China Steal Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponize It?

    Sun, 01/26/2020 – 10:11

    by Great Game India, via Alexander Brown

    Last year a mysterious shipment was caught smuggling Coronavirus from Canada. It was traced to Chinese agents working at a Canadian lab. Subsequent investigation by GreatGameIndia linked the agents to Chinese Biological Warfare Program from where the virus is suspected to have leaked causing the Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak.

    On June 13, 2012 a 60-year-old Saudi man was admitted to a private hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, with a 7-day history of fever, cough, expectoration, and shortness of breath. He had no history of cardiopulmonary or renal disease, was receiving no long-term medications, and did not smoke.

    Egyptian virologist Dr. Ali Mohamed Zaki isolated and identified a previously unknown coronavirus from his lungs. After routine diagnostics failed to identify the causative agent, Zaki contacted Ron Fouchier, a leading virologist at the Erasmus Medical Center (EMC) in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, for advice.

    Abnormalities on Chest Imaging of the Saudi patient infected with Coronavirus. Shown are chest radiographs of the patient on the day of admission (Panel A) and 2 days later (Panel B) and computed tomography (CT) 4 days after admission (Panel C). Fouchier sequenced the virus from a sample sent by Zaki. Fouchier used a broad-spectrum “pan-coronavirus” real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method to test for distinguishing features of a number of known coronaviruses known to infect humans.

    This Coronavirus sample was acquired by Scientific Director Dr. Frank Plummer of Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg directly from Fouchier, who received it from Zaki. This virus was reportedly stolen from the Canadian lab by Chinese agents.

    The Canadian Lab

    Coronavirus arrived at Canada’s NML Winnipeg facility on May 4, 2013 from the Dutch lab. The Canadian lab grew up stocks of the virus and used it to assess diagnostic tests being used in Canada. Winnipeg scientists worked to see which animal species can be infected with the new virus.

    Research was done in conjunction with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s national lab, the National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases which is housed in the same complex as the National Microbiology Laboratory.

    NML has a long history of offering comprehensive testing services for coronaviruses. It isolated and provided the first genome sequence of the SARS coronavirus and identified another coronavirus NL63 in 2004.

    This Winnipeg based Canadian lab was targeted by Chinese agents in what could be termed as Biological Espionage.

    Chinese Biological Espionage

    In March 2019, in mysterious event a shipment of exceptionally virulent viruses from Canada’s NML ended up in China. The event caused a major scandal with Bio-warfare experts questioning why Canada was sending lethal viruses to China. Scientists from NML said the highly lethal viruses were a potential bio-weapon.

    Following investigation, the incident was traced to Chinese agents working at NML. Four months later in July 2019, a group of Chinese virologists were forcibly dispatched from the Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory (NML). The NML is Canada’s only level-4 facility and one of only a few in North America equipped to handle the world’s deadliest diseases, including Ebola, SARS, Coronavirus, etc.

    The NML scientist who was escorted out of the Canadian lab along with her husband, another biologist, and members of her research team is believed to be a Chinese Bio-Warfare agent Xiangguo Qiu. Qiu was the head of the Vaccine Development and Antiviral Therapies Section in the Special Pathogens Program at Canada’s NML.

    Xiangguo Qiu is an outstanding Chinese scientist born in Tianjin. She primarily received her medical doctor degree from Hebei Medical University in China in 1985 and came to Canada for graduate studies in 1996. Later on, she was affiliated with the Institute of Cell Biology and the Department of Pediatrics and Child Health of the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, not engaged with studying pathogens.

    But a shift took place, somehow. Since 2006, she has been studying powerful viruses in Canada’s NML. The viruses shipped from the NML to China were studied by her in 2014, for instance (together with the viruses Machupo, Junin, Rift Valley Fever, Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever and Hendra).

    Infiltrating the Canadian Lab

    Dr. Xiangguo Qiu is married to another Chinese scientist – Dr. Keding Cheng, also affiliated with the NML, specifically the “Science and Technology Core”. Dr. Cheng is primarily a bacteriologist who shifted to virology. The couple is responsible for infiltrating Canada’s NML with many Chinese agents as students from a range of Chinese scientific facilities directly tied to China’s Biological Warfare Program, namely:

    Institute of Military Veterinary, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Changchun

    Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu Military Region

    Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hubei Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

    Sources say Xiangguo Qiu and her husband Keding Cheng were escorted from the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg on July 5, 2019. Since then, the University of Manitoba has ended their appointments, reassigned her graduate students, and cautioned staff, students and faculty about traveling to China. (Governor General’s Innovation Awards). All of the above four mentioned Chinese Biological Warfare facilities collaborated with Dr. Xiangguo Qiu within the context of Ebola virus, the Institute of Military Veterinary joined a study on the Rift Valley fever virus too, while the Institute of Microbiology joined a study on Marburg virus. Noticeably, the drug used in the latter study – Favipiravir – has been earlier tested successfully by the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences, with the designation JK-05 (originally a Japanese patent registered in China already in 2006), against Ebola and additional viruses.

    However, the studies by Dr. Qiu are considerably more advanced and apparently vital for the Chinese biological weapons development in case Coronavirus, Ebola, Nipah, Marburg or Rift Valley fever viruses are included therein.

    The Canadian investigation is ongoing and questions remain whether previous shipments to China of other viruses or other essential preparations, took place from 2006 to 2018, one way or another.

    ( Note: ) Dr. Gary Kobinger, former chief of special pathogens (right), and Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, research scientist (second from right) met with Dr. Kent Brantly and Dr. Linda Mobula, assistant professor at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and the physician who administered ZMapp to Brantly in Liberia when he was infected with Ebola during the 2014-16 outbreak. (Submitted by Health Canada)

    Dr. Xiangguo Qiu also collaborated in 2018 with three scientists from the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Maryland, studying post-exposure immunotherapy for two Ebola viruses and Marburg virus in monkeys; a study supported by the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

    The Wuhan Coronavirus

    Dr. Xiangguo Qiu made at least five trips over the school year 2017-18 to the above mentioned Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, which was certified for BSL4 in January 2017. Moreover, in August 2017, the National Health Commission of China approved research activities involving Ebola, Nipah, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever viruses at the Wuhan facility.

    Coincidentally, the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory is located only 20 miles away from the Huanan Seafood Market which is the epicenter of the Coronavirus outbreak dubbed the Wuhan Coronavirus.

    The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory is located just about 20 miles away from the Huanan Seafood Market, the epicenter of Coronavirus outbreak

    The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory is housed at the Chinese military facility Wuhan Institute of Virology linked to China’s Biological Warfare Program. It was the first ever lab in the country designed to meet biosafety-level-4 (BSL-4) standards – the highest biohazard level, meaning that it would be qualified to handle the most dangerous pathogens.

    In January 2018, the lab was operational ‘for global experiments on BSL-4 pathogens,’ wrote Guizhen Wu in the journal Biosafety and Health. ‘After a laboratory leak incident of SARS in 2004, the former Ministry of Health of China initiated the construction of preservation laboratories for high-level pathogens such as SARS, coronavirus, and pandemic influenza virus,’ wrote Guizhen Wu.

    Coronavirus Bioweapon

    The Wuhan institute has studied coronaviruses in the past, including the strain that causes Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, or SARS, H5N1 influenza virus, Japanese encephalitis, and dengue. Researchers at the institute also studied the germ that causes anthrax – a biological agent once developed in Russia.

    “Coronaviruses (particularly SARS) have been studied in the institute and are probably held therein,” said Dany Shoham, a former Israeli military intelligence officer who has studied Chinese biowarfare. He said. “SARS is included within the Chinese BW program, at large, and is dealt with in several pertinent facilities.”

    James Giordano, a neurology professor at Georgetown University and senior fellow in Biowarfare at the U.S. Special Operations Command, said China’s growing investment in bio-science, looser ethics around gene-editing and other cutting-edge technology and integration between government and academia raise the spectre of such pathogens being weapon. That could mean an offensive agent, or a modified germ let loose by proxies, for which only China has the treatment or vaccine. “This is not warfare, per se,” he said. “But what it’s doing is leveraging the capability to act as global saviour, which then creates various levels of macro and micro economic and bio-power dependencies.”

    China’s Biological Warfare Program

    In a 2015 academic paper, Shoham – of Bar-Ilan’s Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies – asserts that more than 40 Chinese facilities are involved in bio-weapon production.

    China’s Biological Warfare Program is believed to include full range of traditional chemical & biological agents with a wide variety of delivery systems including artillery rockets, aerial bombs, sprayers, and short-range ballistic missiles. #coronarovirus https://t.co/7qpDNNmqk7

    — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) January 25, 2020

    China’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences actually developed an Ebola drug – called JK-05 — but little has been divulged about it or the defence facility’s possession of the virus, prompting speculation its Ebola cells are part of China’s bio-warfare arsenal, Shoham told the National Post.

    Ebola is classified as a “category A” bioterrorism agent by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, meaning it could be easily transmitted from person to person, would result in high death rates and “might cause panic.” The CDC lists Nipah as a category C substance, a deadly emerging pathogen that could be engineered for mass dissemination.

    China’s Biological Warfare Program is believed to be in an advanced stage that includes research and development, production and weaponization capabilities. Its current inventory is believed to include the full range of traditional chemical and biological agents with a wide variety of delivery systems including artillery rockets, aerial bombs, sprayers, and short-range ballistic missiles.

    Weaponizing Biotech

    China’s national strategy of military-civil fusion has highlighted biology as a priority, and the People’s Liberation Army could be at the forefront of expanding and exploiting this knowledge.

    Weaponizing Biotech – China’s War for Biological Dominance#coronoavirushttps://t.co/MEVQ5VERJw

    — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) January 25, 2020

    The PLA is pursuing military applications for biology and looking into promising intersections with other disciplines, including brain science, supercomputing, and artificial intelligence. Since 2016, the Central Military Commission has funded projects on military brain science, advanced biomimetic systems, biological and biomimetic materials, human performance enhancement, and “new concept” biotechnology.

    In 2016, an AMMS doctoral researcher published a dissertation, “Research on the Evaluation of Human Performance Enhancement Technology,” which characterized CRISPR-Cas as one of three primary technologies that might boost troops’ combat effectiveness. The supporting research looked at the effectiveness of the drug Modafinil, which has applications in cognitive enhancement; and at transcranial magnetic stimulation, a type of brain stimulation, while also contending that the “great potential” of CRISPR-Cas as a “military deterrence technology in which China should “grasp the initiative” in development.

    In 2016, the potential strategic value of genetic information led the Chinese government to launch the National Genebank, which intends to become the world’s largest repository of such data. It aims to “develop and utilize China’s valuable genetic resources, safeguard national security in bioinformatics, and enhance China’s capability to seize the strategic commanding heights” in the domain of Biotechnology Warfare.

    Chinese military’s interest in biology as an emerging domain of warfare is guided by strategists who talk about potential “genetic weapons” and the possibility of a “bloodless victory.”Updated Jan 26, 2020, 5:38 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 17:38:00 UTC

  • RT @JayMan471: Democracy has become a farce. Which is why I’m not at all certain

    RT @JayMan471: Democracy has become a farce. Which is why I’m not at all certain it’s going to survive https://twitter.com/clairlemon/status/1221171049577897985

  • so the solution is separation, isolation, and let them decline – we can continue

    so the solution is separation, isolation, and let them decline – we can continue to allow the civilization to collapse one urban area at a time, or we can isolate those urban areas, let them collapse, and restore our civilization in the secondary cities under our rule of law.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 22:33:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221199341408411649

    Reply addressees: @NISquadron @HeadProph @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221198966383091712

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @NISquadron @HeadProph @TOOEdit it is exactly the situation we find ourselves in. Ten big blue island cities with 50% of the population and 50% of the economy, and vast red sea of 50% of the population and 50% of the economy, where that red sea controls production, resources, power, and transportation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221198966383091712

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @NISquadron @HeadProph @TOOEdit it is exactly the situation we find ourselves in. Ten big blue island cities with 50% of the population and 50% of the economy, and vast red sea of 50% of the population and 50% of the economy, where that red sea controls production, resources, power, and transportation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221198966383091712

  • it is exactly the situation we find ourselves in. Ten big blue island cities wit

    it is exactly the situation we find ourselves in. Ten big blue island cities with 50% of the population and 50% of the economy, and vast red sea of 50% of the population and 50% of the economy, where that red sea controls production, resources, power, and transportation.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 22:31:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221198966383091712

    Reply addressees: @NISquadron @HeadProph @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221198524114776064

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221198524114776064

  • Jan 25, 2020, 8:53 PM

    https://buchanan.org/blog/is-mass-civil-disobedience-our-future-138058Updated Jan 25, 2020, 8:53 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 20:53:00 UTC

  • WE ARE EXPERIENCING THE SECOND FALL OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION FOR THE SAME REASON:

    WE ARE EXPERIENCING THE SECOND FALL OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION FOR THE SAME REASON: BARBARIAN INVASION
    But this is our time…. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1221116178975903746

  • It doesn’t matter because the demographic political momentum has prohibited it.

    It doesn’t matter because the demographic political momentum has prohibited it.

    Libertarianism is just rule of law under cowardice.

    Man Up. Shut Up. Show Up. Fight.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 17:03:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221116516734730242

    Reply addressees: @libertarianism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221108523620274178

    IN REPLY TO:

    @libertarianism

    “I’m not arguing for a big social revolution. I don’t think it would help much to argue for that. I’m arguing for small incremental bottom-up changes that help us strengthen our institutions.” – Yuval Levin https://t.co/NZIOyF3USN https://t.co/JpjFD4ERcA

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221108523620274178

  • THE ANTAGONISTS IN THE ILIAD AND THE BIBLE: WHAT ALL REVOLUTIONARIES CLAIM TO BE

    THE ANTAGONISTS IN THE ILIAD AND THE BIBLE: WHAT ALL REVOLUTIONARIES CLAIM TO BE

    by Don Miguel

    All I am pointing out is that there is a big difference in the relations between the protagonists and antogonists of the Illiad and that Bible.

    The antagonists in the Odyssey, are seen in a rather Satanic light and people utterly without excuse. For many reasons:

    1) They are in another’s kingdom and yet do not respect the interests of the King.

    2) They have been given many chances to repent to the regents or deputies of the true ruler and yet fail to do so.

    3) They treat the kingdom as if it belonged to them who are only guests.

    Therefore and a day and hour of which only the gods know, there shall be justice severe and eternal when the true rulers return.

    It’s like LOTR, Robin Hood, the Mahabharata, and the New Testament.

    The good guys who are the representatives/descendants of the proper rulers are marginalized and vilified by the current usurpers.

    The current world order of peace and prosperity was created in accordance with natural law, and the signs of this agency are found in the order that we enjoy. But the people who currently rule are not the servants of Natural Law but usurpers.

    This is what Christians are claimed to be in the Bible as well as what just revolutionaries claim to be.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 15:52:00 UTC