THE CAUSE AND CONSEQUENCE OF THE ANGLO POSTWAR MODEL OF CREATING A WORLD OF FREE TRADE
The United Nations > NATO > The Anglosphere > The USA > Responding to: The Threat [of the moment] to the Postwar Order to Prevent WWWIII.
That’s the hierarchy we used to prevent another set of world wars. World wars occur because without global free trade empires monopolize resources, trade routes, and colonies.
The Anglo postwar order sought and succeeded in building a Smithian moral order, where states were limited to their borders, human rights, economic modernization, and free trade, and were prevented from wars of aggression.
The greatest threat to the restoration of empires, was first communism, and second islamism. And now restored Russian Iranian and Chinese imperialism.
That’s the postwar strategy. We raised mankind out of poverty, starvation, disease, and war. But it didn’t stop everyone from wars of aggression. And it required ‘policing’ wars of RETALIATION for their aggression. You will find no case where that’s not true.
Now, Americans largely profited from this order. Though with the Rise of Chinese manufacturing, it’s hollowed out the working, lower middle, and middle classes. And it’s distorted our economy through excess financialization.
Now you can criticize that hollowing out, and Dear Mr Trump tried to fix that. But you can’t claim it’s not moral, or it’s aggression, or it’s been other than the greatest improvement in the condition of mankind in all of human history.
What we DID learn is that Islamic civilization can’t be saved because they created a political religion that states they’re the perfect will of a divine being. When in fact, it’s the most stagnant civilization with the worst possible religion that’s ever been created by man. And it spreads like cancer because of the lie that we can ignore reality, escape from it, and restore equality by producing ignorance and poverty.
So no. You’re trying to claim that the unseen cost of NOT doing what we’ve done is lower than the cost of what we’ve done with this strategy. Failing to recognize all the goods created by this strategy instead. And like the left, you’re claiming the equivalent of the space program could be better spent on subsidy of reproduction of those who simply increase the number of poor who are unfit for participation in post industrial, technological economies.
Maybe grow up a bit and learn something?
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @SquireKnut @RocklineAdv @BoneheadBarbari @wootendw @McFaul @DianelosG @_michalis12