Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civiliz

    I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civilizations. Our attempts at universalism by universalizing a single class modely of cooperation whether authoritarian socialism(upper), liberalism(upper middle), communism(working) or islamismI(underclass) are all failures. We can spread technology of production but not of governance.

    And if the west should learn one thing it’s that western civ’s group strategy is the most emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually burdensome, and that the rest of the world is unfit for it. And that the only reason we fail, is Aryanism even when cloaked with Christianity, or liberalism, drives us to overextension. We can replace other peoples (europe, americas) but we cannot domesticate, administer, govern, or rule people unfit for our civilizational model that requries maximization of individual rsponsibility for the commons and maximization of truth before face in the commons, and maximization of trust necessary under both. People need temperament and iQ for it, and only eruopeans, the japanese, and koreans are demonstrably fit for it.

    As for Ukraine, Russia. As a ‘resident’ ukrainians are Ruthenians (closer to Poles) not Russians. The russians are closer to muslims and asians in their scope of responsiiblity (family and fence-line), and they are a low trust people who fail the lie-responsibility test.

    America isn’t a civilization. It’s the other side of the river from european civilzation. And neither of us survive without the other over the long term.

    IMO the right favors russia only because they hate their own and are two cowardly and timid to solve the problem of the left at home. While russians are right on culture, they are wrong on politics and economics. And they are so becuase they are a low trust people, who have never built a majority middle class, and have been free of serfdom only for a short window in the late 1800s prior the the bolsheviks, and a short window between 1990 and 2010.

    The family is the priority, not the individual.
    That’s an easy codification to put in place.
    If y’all aren’t too cowardly to show up in numbers and force it.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635673496557584388

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635649197230927872

  • I understand what you’re saying but it’s ancient history, and it’s just not the

    I understand what you’re saying but it’s ancient history, and it’s just not the case from the evidence. Since the fall of the Soviet Union they’ve been cooperating consistently on nearly every issue. Especially in their shared ambition to suppress The Sunni. They’re strategic…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 02:27:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635467576951152641

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Cyril @ForTheLifeofTr1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635465151976550400

  • No. MENA is a not a truth before face, or face before truth, but a faceless soci

    No. MENA is a not a truth before face, or face before truth, but a faceless society – low trust – where family clan and tribe take prescendnce over comons and state. In fact our intelligence services, our military, and our commercial training organizations have to teach westerners that you can’t trust anything said in the middle east, a contract isn’t binding and won’t be respected or observed and a hundred other thigns. The result is that there are no successful governments, an no large scale international corporations, because for all intents and purposes MENA culture is ‘polite’ but untruthful, dishonest, familial, and pervasively corrupt. Islam teaches politeness, and mindfulness, and ‘feelings over reason’. Yet, when the hyper intolerant conformity is broken the muslims resort to violence. And this demand for conformity and feeling, and non-adaptation is the reason muslims are outcast in more advanced civilizations – and prohibited from many especially in theeast, wehre they lack an abrahamic religion. This problem is extensively studied by a range of economists and behaviorists.

    Reply addressees: @ForTheLifeofTr1

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 16:58:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635324475347542033

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635321215295578112

  • No. MENA is a not a truth before face, or face before truth, but a faceless soci

    No. MENA is a not a truth before face, or face before truth, but a faceless society – low trust – where family clan and tribe take prescendnce over comons and state. In fact our intelligence services, our military, and our commercial training organizations have to teach westerners that you can’t trust anything said in the middle east, a contract isn’t binding and won’t be respected or observed and a hundred other thigns. The result is that there are no successful governments, an no large scale international corporations, because for all intents and purposes MENA culture is ‘polite’ but untruthful, dishonest, familial, and pervasively corrupt. Islam teaches politeness, and mindfulness, and ‘feelings over reason’. Yet, when the hyper intolerant conformity is broken the muslims resort to violence. And this demand for conformity and feeling, and non-adaptation is the reason muslims are outcast in more advanced civilizations – and prohibited from many especially in theeast, wehre they lack an abrahamic religion. This problem is extensively studied by a range of economists and behaviorists.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 16:58:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635324475485876225

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635321215295578112

  • I won’t play that game. James (@ConceptualJames) is doing great work, for the co

    I won’t play that game. James (@ConceptualJames) is doing great work, for the common good, and his own understanding is progressing, and he’s converging on something close to the correct understanding AND the solution to it. In fact, I don’t think he needs to take it as far as I do, because he’d cross the third rail if he did, and narrow his audience and his influence. I have to write law. He has to pursuade people whe NEED the law. And that’s a good division of labor.

    As for personalities: He’s from ‘up in the hinterlands’ in the north of NY state, and a similar culture in Tennesee. And I’m from ‘over there’ in the hinterlands of western NY state – both of us near the Canadian border. He makes perfect sense to me. But he’s younger. He’s from a later generation. Has a narrower field of experience and study. Works in the literary rather than scientific frame. And he’s a little ‘southern and christian and culturally scotts irish’. And I’m about as new england anglo founder stock as you can get. But I can cross class, culture, and intellectual lines without difficulty, and appreciate what he does.

    Unlike ‘rigid conservativse’ I don’t need people to be like me. If I did, as you can see, it’d be more lonely out here in supernerdia than it is now.

    I just want us to ‘win’.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @CharlesL1902 @ConceptualJames

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 15:42:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635305385501290497

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635301868674125825

  • I won’t play that game. James (@ConceptualJames) is doing great work, for the co

    I won’t play that game. James (@ConceptualJames) is doing great work, for the common good, and his own understanding is progressing, and he’s converging on something close to the correct understanding AND the solution to it. In fact, I don’t think he needs to take it as far as I do, because he’d cross the third rail if he did, and narrow his audience and his influence. I have to write law. He has to pursuade people whe NEED the law. And that’s a good division of labor.

    As for personalities: He’s from ‘up in the hinterlands’ in the north of NY state, and a similar culture in Tennesee. And I’m from ‘over there’ in the hinterlands of western NY state – both of us near the Canadian border. He makes perfect sense to me. But he’s younger. He’s from a later generation. Has a narrower field of experience and study. Works in the literary rather than scientific frame. And he’s a little ‘southern and christian and culturally scotts irish’. And I’m about as new england anglo founder stock as you can get. But I can cross class, culture, and intellectual lines without difficulty, and appreciate what he does.

    Unlike ‘rigid conservativse’ I don’t need people to be like me. If I did, as you can see, it’d be more lonely out here in supernerdia than it is now.

    I just want us to ‘win’.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 15:42:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635305385648111617

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635301868674125825

  • Psychological disambiguation: “Sex object, vs Wallet object” TERMS “Object” => S

    Psychological disambiguation:
    “Sex object, vs Wallet object”

    TERMS
    “Object” => Self’s Duty For the Common Good.
    “Not-Object” => Selfish Hyperconsumption at the cost of the Common Good.

    CAUSALITY
    All female-biased behavior is reducible to maximization of acquisition of consumption and status by the minimization of responsibility for the commons (capital). IE: Selfishness.
    -vs-
    All male-biased behavior is reducible to maximization of acquisition of capital (not consumption) and status by the maximization of responsibility for the commons (capital).

    ORIGINS
    Now, when we are producing families extended families, clans, and tribes, these sex biases (differences) in behavior, this sex difference in biases reflects our genetic differences due to the sexual division of labor vs production vs war.

    CHANGE
    The industrial, technical, medical revolutions resulted in:
    Decrease in death in war and decrease in death in childbirth.
    Plus;
    Decrease in cellular damage from hard labor -vs- increase in consumption.
    Plus;
    Transformation of education and policy to prioritize the individual instead of the family: feminism, multiculturalism.

    [fin]

    Reply addressees: @Eggggggg_ggggg @Mathilduhhhh @FrailSkeleton

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 14:55:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635293410755244037

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635288483362377728

  • Psychological disambiguation: “Sex object, vs Wallet object” TERMS “Object” => S

    Psychological disambiguation:
    “Sex object, vs Wallet object”

    TERMS
    “Object” => Self’s Duty For the Common Good.
    “Not-Object” => Selfish Hyperconsumption at the cost of the Common Good.

    CAUSALITY
    All female-biased behavior is reducible to maximization of acquisition of consumption and status by the minimization of responsibility for the commons (capital). IE: Selfishness.
    -vs-
    All male-biased behavior is reducible to maximization of acquisition of capital (not consumption) and status by the maximization of responsibility for the commons (capital).

    ORIGINS
    Now, when we are producing families extended families, clans, and tribes, these sex biases (differences) in behavior, this sex difference in biases reflects our genetic differences due to the sexual division of labor vs production vs war.

    CHANGE
    The industrial, technical, medical revolutions resulted in:
    Decrease in death in war and decrease in death in childbirth.
    Plus;
    Decrease in cellular damage from hard labor -vs- increase in consumption.
    Plus;
    Transformation of education and policy to prioritize the individual instead of the family: feminism, multiculturalism.

    [fin]

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 14:55:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635293410893627394

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635288483362377728

  • RT @Eggggggg_ggggg: @Mathilduhhhh @curtdoolittle @FrailSkeleton Men and women sa

    RT @Eggggggg_ggggg: @Mathilduhhhh @curtdoolittle @FrailSkeleton Men and women sacrifice themselves for the family in their respective roles…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 14:54:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635293212272369667

  • Musk makes perfect sense to me because I’m not that different. He just has an ev

    Musk makes perfect sense to me because I’m not that different. He just has an even more inhuman capacity for work than I ever did, and he’s far more prosocial for reasons that probably have to do with circumstances of our upbringings.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 17:26:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634969193098653697

    Reply addressees: @duwadh

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634968221068689408