Theme: Cooperation

THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means – mostly be the remaining agrarian empires that have failed to transition to rule of law: at least Russia, Iran, and China. Or those states with artificial borders created during colonial period, that haven’t yet converted (peacefully) to ethnostates.
5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN, as with all life, is toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that peacefully and prosperously transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

-FIN-

THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means – mostly be the remaining agrarian empires that have failed to transition to rule of law: at least Russia, Iran, and China. Or those states with artificial borders created during colonial period, that haven’t yet converted (peacefully) to ethnostates.
5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN, as with all life, is toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that peacefully and prosperously transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

-FIN-

THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means.
5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN is like all life, toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

-FIN-

THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the peoplem in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ to the territory.
3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means.
5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN is like all life, toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

-FIN-