Theme: Cooperation

  • (yes, well done) GIven that cooperation is the only multiplier on human time, th

    (yes, well done)
    GIven that cooperation is the only multiplier on human time, the velocity of cooperation is only limited by or increased by the trustworithiness of individuals in the network of cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 18:33:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641871460623867906

    Reply addressees: @Hephaistvs

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641870804584484864

  • The correct answer is that diversity is a bad. We can be genetically diverse if

    The correct answer is that diversity is a bad.
    We can be genetically diverse if we are culturally homogenous (full integration)
    We can be culturally divers ANd genetically diverse if we can create our own polities.
    But the postwar pseudoscientific attack on sex, class, cultural, and race differences was another utopian fallacy.
    There are vast differences between the sexes, classes, cultures, and races that MUST be expressed as differences in demand for different behavior.
    Whiteness (truth before face, commons before self, maximization of personal rsponsibility, testifiable truth ( science), rule of law, democracy ) is an extremely costly behavior – the most costly culture on earth – that is only possible for a high trust homogenous polity. We are failing at integrating people ‘outside the range’ who are unable to integrate into that culture. So we are turning the west in the ‘The same sh—holes that people came from’. And no this isn’t an opinion. It’s a measureable change in every aspect of personal, public, economic, and political life.

    Why didn’t india, central asia, the middle east or sub-saharan africa create high trust modern societies? Why did only japan and western europe do so? These are the two least ethnically diverse groups in the world, either explicitly or virtually on peninsulas, coasts, and islands, and with navies – and navies provide high return on capital, drive trade, and innovation, but require TRUST.

    Athens Navy, Rome Marines, Britain Navy, America Marines…
    Sparta Army, Germany Army, China Army, Muslim armies…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 16:46:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641844371254280204

  • The correct answer is that diversity is a bad. We can be genetically diverse if

    The correct answer is that diversity is a bad.
    We can be genetically diverse if we are culturally homogenous (full integration)
    We can be culturally divers ANd genetically diverse if we can create our own polities.
    But the postwar pseudoscientific attack on sex, class, cultural, and race differences was another utopian fallacy.
    There are vast differences between the sexes, classes, cultures, and races that MUST be expressed as differences in demand for different behavior.
    Whiteness (truth before face, commons before self, maximization of personal rsponsibility, testifiable truth ( science), rule of law, democracy ) is an extremely costly behavior – the most costly culture on earth – that is only possible for a high trust homogenous polity. We are failing at integrating people ‘outside the range’ who are unable to integrate into that culture. So we are turning the west in the ‘The same sh—holes that people came from’. And no this isn’t an opinion. It’s a measureable change in every aspect of personal, public, economic, and political life.

    Why didn’t india, central asia, the middle east or sub-saharan africa create high trust modern societies? Why did only japan and western europe do so? These are the two least ethnically diverse groups in the world, either explicitly or virtually on peninsulas, coasts, and islands, and with navies – and navies provide high return on capital, drive trade, and innovation, but require TRUST.

    Athens Navy, Rome Marines, Britain Navy, America Marines…
    Sparta Army, Germany Army, China Army, Muslim armies…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 16:46:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641844371027787778

  • The correct answer is that diversity is a bad. We can be genetically diverse if

    The correct answer is that diversity is a bad.
    We can be genetically diverse if we are culturally homogenous (full integration)
    We can be culturally divers ANd genetically diverse if we can create our own polities.
    But the postwar pseudoscientific attack on sex, class, cultural, and race differences was another utopian fallacy.
    There are vast differences between the sexes, classes, cultures, and races that MUST be expressed as differences in demand for different behavior.
    WHiteness (truth before face, science, rule of law, democracy ) is an extremely costly behavior – the most costly culture on earth – that is only possible for a high trust homogenous polity. We are failing at integrating people ‘outside the range’ who are able to integrate into that culture. so we are turning the west in the ‘the same sh—holes that people came from’. And no this isn’t an opinion. it’s a measureable change in every aspect of personal, public, economic, and political life.

    Why didn’t india, central asia, the middle east or sub-saharan africa create high trust modern societies? Why did only japan and western europe do so? These are the two least ethnically diverse groups in the world with navies – and navies provide high return on capital, drive trade, and innovation.

    Athens navy, Rome Marines, Britain Navy, America Marines…
    Sparta Army, Germany Army, China Army, Muslim armies…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 16:46:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641842180615553025

  • Their priority is empathy in time, and ours is systematic consequences over time

    Their priority is empathy in time, and ours is systematic consequences over time. These positions can’t ‘come together’ they can only find mutually beneficial compromises.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 04:29:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641659000839102465

    Reply addressees: @King0Lobsters @whatifalthist @jgreenhall @fullydavid @ShellenbergerMD

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641658204055642112

  • Guys. Please mantain decorum. There is no reason for this conflict. We’re all tr

    Guys. Please mantain decorum. There is no reason for this conflict. We’re all trying to learn. We are always confident in our positions … until we are not.

    We sometimes lose the best people becasue of male dominance expression masquerading as moral conviction or intellectual…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 02:34:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641267539912032257

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641263143354527744

  • My grandmother would often advise ‘If you are too picky about your friends, you

    My grandmother would often advise ‘If you are too picky about your friends, you won’t have any.” Same is true for social media platforms. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 15:14:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641096574557208576

    Reply addressees: @marianoforgiato

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641092043618365442

  • I don’t know how we got from husbands and wives, who for all intents and purpose

    I don’t know how we got from husbands and wives, who for all intents and purposes, hire each other to produce the discount of the division of the labor of maintaining a household, and if possible children, who may care for us a bit in our old age, and if possible, giving our life some meaning, some purpose, other than consumption and tax paying, into “I marry someone to entertain me.” Now, I know it started in the 1970s. But what a disaster this experiment has turned out to be. The logical consequence is a return to marriage for the very careful intergenerationally wealthy, serial marriage for the rest of the top and middle, and no marriage and single motherhood for the poor. Because that’s what the data sure looks like. There really is no reason for marriage once the state has given us the means to escape having children. Once women can displace men in the workforce. And where displaced men can do next to nothing and live well. It’s a recipe for many poor households. And pervasive alienation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 22:03:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640836995306999811

  • I don’t know how we got from husbands and wives, who for all intents and purpose

    I don’t know how we got from husbands and wives, who for all intents and purposes, hire each other to produce the discount of the division of the labor of maintaining a household, and if possible children, who may care for us a bit in our old age, and if possible, giving our life some meaning, some purpose, other than consumption and tax paying, into “I marry someone to entertain me.” Now, I know it started in the 1970s. But what a disaster this experiment has turned out to be. The logical consequence is a return to marriage for the very careful intergenerationally wealthy, serial marriage for the rest of the top and middle, and no marriage and single motherhood for the poor. Because that’s what the data sure looks like. There really is no reason for marriage once the state has given us the means to escape having children. Once women can displace men in the workforce. And where displaced men can do next to nothing and live well. It’s a recipe for many poor households. And pervasive alienation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 22:03:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640836995189547008

  • IRONY I have one objective: maximization of human cooperation for the benefit of

    IRONY
    I have one objective: maximization of human cooperation for the benefit of all. That means races, ethnicities, classes, sexes, and ages. This is possible under rule of law by the natural common concurrent law. But if we can’t truthfully discuss human differences, then we can’t satisfy differences in human wants and needs. So by lying that differences don’t exist, we generate conflict, that can only be resolved by authority that is the antithesis of each end of the spectrum.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 19:21:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640433763787194369