Theme: Cooperation

  • Religion Via-Negativa

    RELIGION VIA NEGATIVA So, when you say ‘religion’, we all need the services provided by ‘religion’ whether or not we consume them directly or indirectly through others. The question is whether we need supernaturalism, fictionalism, and outright falsehood. The answer is demonstrably no.

    On the other hand – more precisely – it means those of us with a great deal of agency do not need it, but desire it’s consequences. It means that those with the pretense of agency – the ‘atheists’ need a substitute for it, and have chosen pseudo-rationalism and pseudoscience. It means that some of us mouth pretense to it because we understand the value of religion but find the superstition, supernaturalism, fictionalism, and outright falsehood merely an absurd cost of obtaining the good produced by the rituals and discipline. And it means that those without the ability to trust those with more agency than they, need the superstition to sate their emotions, the supernaturalism to grant authority to the fictionalism, and the outright falsehood as a means of insulating themselves from suggestion by those who would sway them from the strategies embodied in all of the above. There is no reason we cannot cause the production of truthful religion by the suppression of fictional religion. History replaces myth. Fiction fictionalism. Science superstition. And the natural law of men, resistance against suggestion, deception, and predation. Curt Doolittle
  • Via Negativa Goods: Intolerance

    Nick Heywood on Via Negativa: Intolerance We don’t need tolerance in a culturally homogeneous, high trust, society bound by self evident (Common sense) principles. There’s nothing to tolerate! Therefore, “Western Tolerance” is a myth. Used by those seeking to acquire the power, the individual and sovereign once possessed. To surrender their principles, values, sovereignty and culture. This leads to decisional confusion. There are no limits with in which decisions can be made. Confusions reigns! And it worked! By Bob Moran on Via Negativa: Intolerance. Tolerance as a virtue is a deception. Everything we care for we build and protect with INTOLERANCE. If you want your company to succeed, you don’t tolerate incompetence. If you want a degree to be worth something, you don’t tolerate idiots. If you want your family to to be safe, you don’t tolerate a random hobo coming in your house. Intolerance is a tool against entropy; we separate the good from the bad. Remove it, and everything will immediately start to decay and turn to dust.  

  • Via Negativa Goods: Intolerance

    Nick Heywood on Via Negativa: Intolerance We don’t need tolerance in a culturally homogeneous, high trust, society bound by self evident (Common sense) principles. There’s nothing to tolerate! Therefore, “Western Tolerance” is a myth. Used by those seeking to acquire the power, the individual and sovereign once possessed. To surrender their principles, values, sovereignty and culture. This leads to decisional confusion. There are no limits with in which decisions can be made. Confusions reigns! And it worked! By Bob Moran on Via Negativa: Intolerance. Tolerance as a virtue is a deception. Everything we care for we build and protect with INTOLERANCE. If you want your company to succeed, you don’t tolerate incompetence. If you want a degree to be worth something, you don’t tolerate idiots. If you want your family to to be safe, you don’t tolerate a random hobo coming in your house. Intolerance is a tool against entropy; we separate the good from the bad. Remove it, and everything will immediately start to decay and turn to dust.  

  • WHAT DO MEN WANT FROM WOMEN —“CURT: What do men want from women?”— Emotional

    WHAT DO MEN WANT FROM WOMEN

    —“CURT: What do men want from women?”—

    Emotional rewards, friendship, play, sex, affection, nesting-caretaking (feeding especially), family(his own tribe), long term security – since we accumulate much more damage in life.

    Men have no care except sex until they marry you, and after that they have many many cares more than they evolved to care for. Women can track 1000 little things nearby and in the present. Men track a few things at a distance, and in the future. This is the difference between men and women. We specialize and women generalize. We think in drawers, one open at a time. Women think in a world of nearly uncontrollable interruptions.

    You consider your emotional care for a man as ‘work’ or ‘cost’ but a man sees everything he does other than live with a few men in a cave, hunting, and playing with tools as a cost in order to obtain affection, care, sex, and the social status that his fellow men demand of him in exchange for trusting him.

    Men are aware that the vast majority are evolutionarily disposable and the vast majority of women are not. We are aware that we conduct experiments against reality and women select us for sex affection and reproduction depending upon our success as individuals and members of a team (pack). We are also aware of our real chances – and that for the majority of us they are not that good. We are aware that the cost of specialization means men vary more in ability and desirability than women. And that means that many of us must take extraordinary risks and accumulate cellular damage in order to obtain access to any women and any reproduction and any care at all.

    The testosterone that makes us different will eventually kill all men. It is a magical poison. A faustian bargain with the devil. We mature more slowly, we peak later, we accumulate more damage, and we die sooner. We know this. We are often very careful after 40 for this reason.

    For these reasons men will seek to produce a diverse meritocratic order with as many opportunities to demonstrate success in climbing the dominance hierarchy as possible. This is why diversity increases crime, violence, and political tension: groups are demonstrably better and worse at climbing dominance hierarchies in the modern world. While we are wealthier, it is increasingly difficult for a man to earn enough of a living to support a woman and her children in exchange for sex and affection.

    Explaining the world of emotions to us. Explaining the concerns of others to us. Giving us ideas of where and where not to apply our various kinds of ‘force’.

    Acknowledgement that men’s need for sex is physical, on the scale of women’s need for security.

    Understanding that ‘reminding’ is nagging, and nagging evolved so that women could train children. But every time you remind a man, it is the equivalent of him telling you that you’re ass is too fat to wear that dress. Every single time. We just suffer the insult more easily than you. But it is an insult and destructive every time. Men are not trained by reminding. They are trained by rewards.

    It’s not that we don’t care it’s that we are color blind to the categories that you see, just as you are (and you can’t admit it or even recognize it) blind to what we see: politics as a proxy for violence with other men, so that our genes survive into the future in a condition better than they are in the present.

    Think of many small ways to make your man successful. We are like dogs who will fetch a ball until we drop dead. But like wolves we respond (violently) to commands or guilt.

    We are not substitutes for girlfriends, nesting helpers, older daughters, your mother or your sisters. We are men. We compete with other men to obtain the status necessary to make us attractive to women, who then care for us in exchange for provision and labor.

    Limit your nesting urges to that which is productive not consumptive. Consumerism is just a different form of alcoholism. Limit your men’s play to that which provides returns for him and the family. Everything else is extending childhood. Do the same for your boys.

    Men need fire gazing(daydreaming), watching the horizon for prey(watching sports), or chipping flints (playing with tools) the way women need to chat about nonsense with other women. We can’t function without them, but both can become addictions.

    Making boys sit and be quiet like girls causes them brain damage that they will never recover from. Making them timit and non-aggressive does the same. Men compete in dominance hierarchies. By making life easy for you by creating a docile boy, you are crippling him for life. You want a man that sits around the house watching video games and television? blame his mother. His wife will blame you for the same. And after four generations your genes will be dispersed and gone. Why? Strong men defeat weak men, and weak men are made by weak women.

    Demands upon men that are good: If you are slept, fed, dressed, and fucked you need to be getting enough exercise, competing with and cooperating with other men, and producing long term assets for the family. End of story.

    Women have taken over the ‘easy’ jobs in society pushing men into higher competition roles, where it is harder to ‘integrate’ into the team, and it is harder for males who evolved to specialize, to integrate into teams. This means that there are decreasing chances for many men to find success.

    We no longer work in groups where we insure one another as we did as laborers, craftsmen, in villages, in guilds, and in armies. every man is more vulnerable now than he has been in the past and is less ‘insured’ by his fellow men. His emotional stress is high but he doesn’t understand why.

    So what these two things mean, is that men must feel that they can at least not fall down in the dominance hierarchy and therefore loose their ability to obtain sex, affection, and caretaking.

    Generally speaking, whenever there is a surplus of men who feel this way a civilization will go through a civil war or collapse. Because it takes a very small percentage of males willint to disrupt the current order in order to overthrow it.

    Men evolved to climb a dominance hierarchy, and women evolved to be attracted to the highest point on that hierarchy that they can obtain control over their reproduction and provision, and entertainment from.

    Men are absurdly simple creatures. We just can’t see, hear, smell, intuit, feel or think all the subtleties about humans that women can, and so we have more time to devote to learning how the physical world works, and specializing in it, and competing by our understanding and use of it.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 12:14:00 UTC

  • DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET? ARYANISM: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING? Abrahamism imposes artif

    DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET? ARYANISM: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING?

    Abrahamism imposes artificial equality where we are only equal if we are slaves. Western religion was originally pagan, meaning a hierarchical family, infinitely extensible, where individuals could find both virtues to imitate, sins to avoid, and advocates for their roles in society at every single level.

    Abrahamism is not a market strategy for a division of knowledge, labor and advocacy among many small extended clans organized into nation states, but an authoritarian and monopolistic one for the production and maintenance of a despotic empire.

    Aryanism *IS* a market strategy, and our original religion provided us with a both a unifying narrative of an extended family with virtues, sins, roles, and interests, custom tailored gods, demi gods, heroes, and great men to appeal to.

    Our god was not demanding, or commanding, or even engaged, but provided wisdom, justice, and decisions in exchange for offerings – *a trade*.

    Do you understand the difference between Aryanism and Semitism yet? Markets and families, vs Monopoly and Empire.

    No excuses. No more lies.

    End the pollution of the west. Imitate the only other superior people on this earth, the east asians, and insulate ourselves from the ‘people of the center’ who failed to transcend from beast to man.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 12:45:00 UTC

  • USE THE ARGUMENT TO RECIPROCITY MORE? —“We (the real right) should use the wor

    USE THE ARGUMENT TO RECIPROCITY MORE?

    —“We (the real right) should use the word/concept of reciprocity a lot more in public discourse, because normies intuitively “get” the concept in its most basic form (not the full propertarian use, but the simple idea – e.g. the fact that it is one of Cialdini’s 6 laws of influence, people feel obligated to return good deeds & feel others have an obligation to return good deeds). It is a great way to diffuse the “we are obligated to hand over everything to the brown hordes” assertion. I like to say things like, “I care about 3rd-world immigrants and their children exactly as much as they care about me and my children: not at all.” Or “These people from very different cultures than Western Civ can come colonize our nations as soon as they agree to let us come do the same to their nations.”

    This “bring up the reciprocity principle” exposes the hordes’ strategy for what it really is: nothing but a gimme-dat power-play.

    I know we’re done talking to the left. But tactics like these can demonstrate and reinforce our moral high ground to (not fully red-pilled) righties and normies.”— John Lille


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 12:03:00 UTC

  • “If your people are organically organized, clannish, tribal, egalitarian and hav

    —“If your people are organically organized, clannish, tribal, egalitarian and have a thing for “purity” then they will also have high trust. You can expand, but you can’t build an empire or you’ll destroy it. Empires require bureaucracy and hierarchy as well as the extension of kinship to others. People that can’t (and didn’t!) do extended families can’t do empires. I guess It should be obvious.”—

    Very good. Markets for nations. Markets for regions. Markets for whatever we want – among our kin. We can build a civilization but we cannot build an empire.

    An empire by definition crosses ethnic and cultural lines. a civilization by definition is defined but ethnic and cultural lines.

    America is an empire and cannot therefore persist as a european civilization under common law.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 20:16:00 UTC

  • RELIGION: – Myths – – Justifications – – Judgements – Festivals – Rituals – – Co

    RELIGION:

    – Myths

    – – Justifications

    – – Judgements

    – Festivals

    – Rituals

    – – Costs (investments)

    – – Submission to the Safety Cult or Tribe

    – – Equality of Interest

    – – Sacredness and Purity.

    – Disciplines

    – – Mindfulness

    – – “Faith”

    Where “Faith” refers to the surrender of reason in to those judgements and justifications and the elimination of the burden of reason, the burden of information gathering, the burden of testing the propositions of others, and the need to defend against the deceptions of others.

    Religion can be produced by either informal traditions, or formal doctrinal traditions.

    Ergo, Religion is a means of providing consistent decidability on a strategy for a group, population, or civilization. The frailty of Religion is that it adapts poorly and slowly.

    PHILOSOPHY

    internally consistent, ideal,…

    LAW

    empirically constructed, internally consistent, externally correspondent, …


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 18:08:00 UTC

  • THROUGH BROTHERHOOD WE TRANSCEND OURSELVES, OUR PEOPLE, AND MAN It is only throu

    THROUGH BROTHERHOOD WE TRANSCEND OURSELVES, OUR PEOPLE, AND MAN

    It is only through the brotherhood of warriors that we can construct the contract of reciprocity, that insures our sovereignty, and as such, as a consequence of that sovereignty, we can only act and speak without violating that contract by use of the natural, common, law of sovereign men, a judicial ‘priesthood’ that masters and evolves the technology of that law, a market for freedom of association and disassociation; a market for reproduction(family); a market for the production of goods, services, and information; a market for the production of commons; a monarchy as a judge of contracts of last resort, and a market for polities under which each clan, tribe, and nation, can construct commons that assist every family, clan, tribe, and nation, in competing against the dark forces of time, ignorance, the vicissitudes of nature, and the devolutionary demands of the ‘lesser peoples’ of this world.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 13:34:00 UTC

  • A CLAIM OF SUPERIORITY ISN’T NECESSARY FOR ETHNOCENTRISM by Simon Ström A claim

    A CLAIM OF SUPERIORITY ISN’T NECESSARY FOR ETHNOCENTRISM

    by Simon Ström

    A claim of superiority is never necessary for making ethnocentrism a good strategy.

    Since members of an ethnic group share vested interest in each other’s genes, their instincts are more aligned toward cooperation by default.

    In concert with culture, fixed traits means we are designed to work together in a certain way by nature of our common recent origin, and there are even medical implications of miscegenation.

    Within the context of macro-ethnicity (race, subrace, tribe), the formation of nations, tribes and countries should be subject to the market.

    That is Aryanism: The formation of nations, tribes and countries should be subject to the market.

    And remember Aryanism didn’t evolve beyond that scale.

    Ancient Indo-Europeanization-by-conquest really only occurred within Europe, as IE migrations projecting onto densely populated Asian cultures didn’t have a great, or lasting, civilizational impact (Duchesne).

    Moreover, the only people you should ‘hate’ are internal enemies (=ostracizing their behavior). The others, you just deal with them reciprocally. That’s the approach of agency.

    – Simon Strom


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 17:52:00 UTC