A CLAIM OF SUPERIORITY ISN’T NECESSARY FOR ETHNOCENTRISM by Simon Ström A claim

A CLAIM OF SUPERIORITY ISN’T NECESSARY FOR ETHNOCENTRISM

by Simon Ström

A claim of superiority is never necessary for making ethnocentrism a good strategy.

Since members of an ethnic group share vested interest in each other’s genes, their instincts are more aligned toward cooperation by default.

In concert with culture, fixed traits means we are designed to work together in a certain way by nature of our common recent origin, and there are even medical implications of miscegenation.

Within the context of macro-ethnicity (race, subrace, tribe), the formation of nations, tribes and countries should be subject to the market.

That is Aryanism: The formation of nations, tribes and countries should be subject to the market.

And remember Aryanism didn’t evolve beyond that scale.

Ancient Indo-Europeanization-by-conquest really only occurred within Europe, as IE migrations projecting onto densely populated Asian cultures didn’t have a great, or lasting, civilizational impact (Duchesne).

Moreover, the only people you should ‘hate’ are internal enemies (=ostracizing their behavior). The others, you just deal with them reciprocally. That’s the approach of agency.

– Simon Strom