Noah J RevoyRuthless selfishness is not an advantage to a group. In-group preference however is. Whites are still by far the strongest race as judged by what we produce (inventions, culture, GDP), we are still histories best warriors and we can easily take over the whole world if we wanted to. The problem is that we have lost our will to power. Generation X is however a return to our roots. They are pissed off that the Baby Boomers squandered the sacrifices of our ancestors and they are willing to take back our birth right. Whites have hit bottom and we are now starting to turn it around.
Theme: Cooperation
-
Use the Argument to Reciprocity More Often.
USE THE ARGUMENT TO RECIPROCITY MORE? —“We (the real right) should use the word/concept of reciprocity a lot more in public discourse, because normies intuitively “get” the concept in its most basic form (not the full propertarian use, but the simple idea – e.g. the fact that it is one of Cialdini’s 6 laws of influence, people feel obligated to return good deeds & feel others have an obligation to return good deeds). It is a great way to diffuse the “we are obligated to hand over everything to the brown hordes” assertion. I like to say things like, “I care about 3rd-world immigrants and their children exactly as much as they care about me and my children: not at all.” Or “These people from very different cultures than Western Civ can come colonize our nations as soon as they agree to let us come do the same to their nations.”
This “bring up the reciprocity principle” exposes the hordes’ strategy for what it really is: nothing but a gimme-dat power-play. I know we’re done talking to the left. But tactics like these can demonstrate and reinforce our moral high ground to (not fully red-pilled) righties and normies.”— John Lille -
Use the Argument to Reciprocity More Often.
USE THE ARGUMENT TO RECIPROCITY MORE? —“We (the real right) should use the word/concept of reciprocity a lot more in public discourse, because normies intuitively “get” the concept in its most basic form (not the full propertarian use, but the simple idea – e.g. the fact that it is one of Cialdini’s 6 laws of influence, people feel obligated to return good deeds & feel others have an obligation to return good deeds). It is a great way to diffuse the “we are obligated to hand over everything to the brown hordes” assertion. I like to say things like, “I care about 3rd-world immigrants and their children exactly as much as they care about me and my children: not at all.” Or “These people from very different cultures than Western Civ can come colonize our nations as soon as they agree to let us come do the same to their nations.”
This “bring up the reciprocity principle” exposes the hordes’ strategy for what it really is: nothing but a gimme-dat power-play. I know we’re done talking to the left. But tactics like these can demonstrate and reinforce our moral high ground to (not fully red-pilled) righties and normies.”— John Lille -
Did it occur to you that the voluntary organization of production we call capita
Did it occur to you that the voluntary organization of production we call capitalism is, like farming, dependent upon the % who can produce?
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-02 19:57:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/859496999007158275
-
The Objectively Best Strategy for Women and Possibly for Mankind.
The objectively best strategy for a group is for women to seek reproduction with the most alpha male that they can, while at the same time trading sex and affection for reliable resources, status, and defense from non-alphas. And as far as I can tell, this is what they do. And they vary their strategy based upon the availability of men. Just as men vary their strategy based upon the availability of women.This would mean we would likely only see monogamy in upper classes, and that the upper classes would improve the mean and develop into a caste, and the lower classes would regress to the mean or below it.Unless of course it is nearly impossible to survive without the cooperation of members of a family – since a woman without a husband only places additional burden on the carrying capacity of her birth group.And this is what we see.The strategy for the aristocracy then should be to use their abilities to obtain positions of rule, and specialize in developing an aristocracy, and taxing the daylights out of the underclasses that do not imitate them, while accepting all those who can demonstrate membership in aristocracy through their actions. The problem is that we live too long. If we died at 40 that would be one thing. But it is very hard to survive late in life on one’s personal productivity, in a world of increasing competitiveness given the rest of the world is no longer so intellectually, technologically, and institutionally far behind. And so larger and larger households will likely continue to evolve, and mobility will decrease since the absurdities of the 20th century are no longer possible.The likely scenario is that the wealthy and able will insulate themselves behind automatons that do not have to be incentivized and the rest of mankind will revert to near animal barbarism. That is the next source of speciation that I see on the horizon. -
The Objectively Best Strategy for Women and Possibly for Mankind.
The objectively best strategy for a group is for women to seek reproduction with the most alpha male that they can, while at the same time trading sex and affection for reliable resources, status, and defense from non-alphas. And as far as I can tell, this is what they do. And they vary their strategy based upon the availability of men. Just as men vary their strategy based upon the availability of women.This would mean we would likely only see monogamy in upper classes, and that the upper classes would improve the mean and develop into a caste, and the lower classes would regress to the mean or below it.Unless of course it is nearly impossible to survive without the cooperation of members of a family – since a woman without a husband only places additional burden on the carrying capacity of her birth group.And this is what we see.The strategy for the aristocracy then should be to use their abilities to obtain positions of rule, and specialize in developing an aristocracy, and taxing the daylights out of the underclasses that do not imitate them, while accepting all those who can demonstrate membership in aristocracy through their actions. The problem is that we live too long. If we died at 40 that would be one thing. But it is very hard to survive late in life on one’s personal productivity, in a world of increasing competitiveness given the rest of the world is no longer so intellectually, technologically, and institutionally far behind. And so larger and larger households will likely continue to evolve, and mobility will decrease since the absurdities of the 20th century are no longer possible.The likely scenario is that the wealthy and able will insulate themselves behind automatons that do not have to be incentivized and the rest of mankind will revert to near animal barbarism. That is the next source of speciation that I see on the horizon. -
The Causes of the West
Cool or Cold Climate > Low Population Density > Low Survival of Unfit > Greater Cooperation > Low ‘Clannishness’Distributed Production (low returns of hunting, farming, raiding) > Voluntary Militia ( Defense and Raiding/Offense)Distributed Production(low returns) > Voluntary Militia + ‘Advanced’ Technology + Maneuver > Military Superiority > Prosperity (defense and offense) > High Risk Heroism as a means of climbing the dominance hierarchy > Broad Opportunity and Incentive.Voluntary Militia (Raiding) + Military Superiority > Superior competition > Raiding for Profit > Rule for Profit > Domestication for profit > Production for Profit > Trade for Profit > Innovation for profit > Rents for Profit > Maximization of rents > Fragility to Shocks > Overextension or Inability to adapt. > Defeat.Voluntary Militia > Sovereignty(Intolerance)> Natural Law (Reciprocity) > Markets in Everything > Association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities.Markets in Everything > Climbing Dominance Hierarchy> Innovation > Faster Evolution > Division of Labor and Knowledge > Ever-Decreasing Costs > Imitation by Competitors > Co-Evolution.Voluntary Militia > Reporting/Testimony > Natural Law (Reciprocity) > Markets for Dispute Resolution > Jury > Reason, Rationalism, Logic, Empiricism, Science, Operationalism, ‘Coincidence-ism’. > Incremental and Rapid Suppression of parasitism > minimization of oppy for rents/frauds > forced maximization of effort and innovation for survival > increasing productivity > increasing competitive ability.THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF MARKETS AND INNOVATION VIA COMMONS RATHER THAN MONOPOLY AND RENTS VIA PRIVATIZATION. Or stated differently: the maximization of production vs the maximization of rents because of constant pressure of coevolution.THE RESULT:Militia > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Markets In Everything > Transcendence of Man. -
The Causes of the West
Cool or Cold Climate > Low Population Density > Low Survival of Unfit > Greater Cooperation > Low ‘Clannishness’Distributed Production (low returns of hunting, farming, raiding) > Voluntary Militia ( Defense and Raiding/Offense)Distributed Production(low returns) > Voluntary Militia + ‘Advanced’ Technology + Maneuver > Military Superiority > Prosperity (defense and offense) > High Risk Heroism as a means of climbing the dominance hierarchy > Broad Opportunity and Incentive.Voluntary Militia (Raiding) + Military Superiority > Superior competition > Raiding for Profit > Rule for Profit > Domestication for profit > Production for Profit > Trade for Profit > Innovation for profit > Rents for Profit > Maximization of rents > Fragility to Shocks > Overextension or Inability to adapt. > Defeat.Voluntary Militia > Sovereignty(Intolerance)> Natural Law (Reciprocity) > Markets in Everything > Association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities.Markets in Everything > Climbing Dominance Hierarchy> Innovation > Faster Evolution > Division of Labor and Knowledge > Ever-Decreasing Costs > Imitation by Competitors > Co-Evolution.Voluntary Militia > Reporting/Testimony > Natural Law (Reciprocity) > Markets for Dispute Resolution > Jury > Reason, Rationalism, Logic, Empiricism, Science, Operationalism, ‘Coincidence-ism’. > Incremental and Rapid Suppression of parasitism > minimization of oppy for rents/frauds > forced maximization of effort and innovation for survival > increasing productivity > increasing competitive ability.THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF MARKETS AND INNOVATION VIA COMMONS RATHER THAN MONOPOLY AND RENTS VIA PRIVATIZATION. Or stated differently: the maximization of production vs the maximization of rents because of constant pressure of coevolution.THE RESULT:Militia > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Markets In Everything > Transcendence of Man. -
Distributed Production >Militia >Sovereignty(Intolerance)> Natural Law (Reciproc
Distributed Production >Militia >Sovereignty(Intolerance)> Natural Law (Reciprocity)> Markets in Everything> Climbing Hierarchy> Innovation.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-02 15:15:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/859426154188595200
-
Religion Via-Negativa
RELIGION VIA NEGATIVA So, when you say ‘religion’, we all need the services provided by ‘religion’ whether or not we consume them directly or indirectly through others. The question is whether we need supernaturalism, fictionalism, and outright falsehood. The answer is demonstrably no.
On the other hand – more precisely – it means those of us with a great deal of agency do not need it, but desire it’s consequences. It means that those with the pretense of agency – the ‘atheists’ need a substitute for it, and have chosen pseudo-rationalism and pseudoscience. It means that some of us mouth pretense to it because we understand the value of religion but find the superstition, supernaturalism, fictionalism, and outright falsehood merely an absurd cost of obtaining the good produced by the rituals and discipline. And it means that those without the ability to trust those with more agency than they, need the superstition to sate their emotions, the supernaturalism to grant authority to the fictionalism, and the outright falsehood as a means of insulating themselves from suggestion by those who would sway them from the strategies embodied in all of the above. There is no reason we cannot cause the production of truthful religion by the suppression of fictional religion. History replaces myth. Fiction fictionalism. Science superstition. And the natural law of men, resistance against suggestion, deception, and predation. Curt Doolittle