Theme: Cooperation

THE CHALLENGE OF MAINTAINING A HIGH TRUST NEOTONIC GENE POOL

It’s not race, per se, since any race can produce excellences. It’s neotonic selection (speciation), and distributions. So the problem is that homo-sapiens-sapiens races and subraces, nations and communities vary by (a) the amount of reproductive domestication by neotonic selection of the ‘animal’ man, and (b) the success or failure at reducing the size of the underclasses (less fit, less desirable, less productive).

Europeans and east asians were the most successful at both. We could even argue easily that the east asians have taken it too far. IQ and lack of Impulsivity are the result of neotonic selection of females by males, and selection of males with demonstrated ability to climb the dominance hierarchy by females. By the use of marriage and farming we have been able to control this process in the east and west but not in the rest.

The success of the chinese, korean and japanese, like that of the europeans, nordics, and british, is relative isolation from the population pressures of the under domesticated peoples of the steppe and desert. Worse, it is far harder to cleanse a gene pool than we had imagined. So pollution of high trust, highly neotenic, high-iq gene pools is extremely costly and nearly impossible to reverse without deliberate eugenic programs.

And that is still at large scale. We still do not know the subtle differences between groups. Whites and east asians are ‘special’. At least among the middle and lower asians and whites, cross breeding apparently produces benefits for both.

Bte even between advanced subraces, whites differ from east asians in inverting our specializations in verbal and spatial. And It appears that we can out-breed the bad behavior out of the Ashkenazi, but it is almost impossible to lose the feminine traits, even if it is possible to retain the extra verbal abilities.

So I do not think markets solve the problem at scale and in cities like markets solve the problem in small agrarian communities, because it is easy to observe subtle differences between people who are similar and to produce excellences, and it is harder to produce excellences when differences are not subtle. Because are limited in our discretionary ability. Men are less discriminate and women discriminate by status. So it appears that the best reproductive strategy is upward redistribution of reproduction, and culling of the bottom through through sterilization or one-child policy, near-breeding, and miscegenation, all of which will lead to ‘higher experimentation’ which is the advantage of all market innovation.