Well, that’s just it, isn’t it? 1 – The individual only needs to understand his

Well, that’s just it, isn’t it?

1 – The individual only needs to understand his choice is preferable.(person)

2 – Those cooperating only need to understand their choices are good.(group)

3 – Those deciding conflicts only need to understand whether the conflict is decidable. (judge)

Now people conflate the possible, the preferable, the good, and the true, as if they’re synonyms, without considering the implied grammar.

A preference isn’t true. It’s just a preference and possible or not.

A good isn’t true, it’s just preferable, and good, and possible or not.

A truth isn’t preferable or good, it’s just true.

Yet another example of the problem of conflation rather than operational grammar and definitions.