–“Trump supporters are happy people. They are happy in the first place, but they are happy to have found community, and so happier together. And that happiness and community is a threat to those who would undermine it.”–
Conservatives are better looking, have better culture…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-22 18:03:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749492905138389386
POPULAR QUOTES BY PATTON ON THE RUSSIANS
The west always ends wars too early because we practice the western way of war, of wanting to restore cooperation and trade after the war, and limit animosity between the people as well as the rulers. That’s not the russian, asian or islamic way of war.
–“The difficulty in understanding the Russian is that we do not take cognizance of the fact that he is not a European, but an Asiatic, and therefore thinks deviously. We can no more understand a Russian than a Chinese or a Japanese, and from what I have seen of them, I have no particular desire to understand them except to ascertain how much lead or iron it takes to kill them. In addition to his other amiable characteristics, the Russian has no regard for human life and they are all out sons-of-(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)es, barbarians, and chronic drunks.”–
–“The Russians are mongols. They are Slavs and a lot of them used to be ruled by ancient Byzantium. From Genghis Kahn to Stalin. They have not changed. They never will and we will never learn, at least , not until it is too late.”–
“I understand the situation. Their [the Soviet] supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof–that’s their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let’s not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!”
“If it should be necessary for us fight the Russians, the sooner we do it, the better. We could have arrived sooner but for the fact if one flies over Russian occupied territory they shoot at you .Nice friends.”
“If we have to fight them , now is the time. From now on , we will get weaker and they will get stronger.”
Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 18:50:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749142455813804032
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749138058153464227
The Privilege of Proximity in exchange for the Cost of Conformity.
Why do people who will not fully integrate have the privilege of access to european people their culture their economy their institutions and their civilization?
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-17 22:59:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747755459522560471
The Privilege of Proximity in exchange for the Cost of Conformity.
Why do people who will not fully integrate have the privilege of access to european people their culture their economy their institutions and their civilization?
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-17 22:59:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747755459463778304
I understand.
However, let me invoke a counsel for the right: the right fails to unify because it is so intolerant that every individual man becomes his own faction by way of overconfidence that he alone is correct.
So, I take a different position: that as long as someone is moving some part of the mission forward, the rest of his opinions and ideas are irrelevant.
The left just moves the ball forward.
The right like insecure women feels the need for total comprehensino, total agreement, and no risk to act – which is why y’all fail – always.
So I I tolerate whatever I must in order to move forward suffficiently to obtain power after which we can settle what obsessions we want to pursue and those we want to abandon.
Reply addressees: @Rasterdingus
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-16 16:46:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747299387821203456
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747294659984900267
RT @AutistocratMS: @NWEurasian @curtdoolittle It’s universally particularist. Ethnocentric cooperation is always a dominant evolutionary st…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 15:20:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746915345774837988
the catholic lens at least after aquinas is simply the restatedment of church dogma as natural law of cooperation. The natural law of coooperation turns out to be the science of cooperation. And chrsitinity turns out to be the optimum training for participation in a high trust society under the natural law. The only difference being that the catholic states were more corrupt (southern) because they were older institutions, where the norhtern states were both less corrupt and less tolerant of corruption because the state in the holy roman empire was more competent and pragmaticc and secular. So, the prostestant reformation was a rebellion against church lying and corruption just as the present rebellion against the marxist-to-woke academy-state-media complex is a rebellion against lying and corruption,
Reply addressees: @Dang57404287
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-14 19:01:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746608572278992896
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746606018719523008
Btw. Stop projecting emotions as drivers of my reason. My only objective is is furthering cooperation by ending lying in matters public and policy that reverses the lies present already. When I add sentimentality to my statements it serves two purposes: the first is to demonstrate that I understand and empathize, second that I follow the truth anyway. If I don’t do this people assume I am motivated as you are: a disagreeable with disregard for the biological differences in psychological need. I have learned to temper my public prose.
Reply addressees: @teodoriancu14
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 14:00:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746170470095876096
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746160821967724569
Most of us live in the privilege of western high trust societies that are WEIRD (western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic) and we assume this is normal and not weird. The idea that you can live in another country and carry around your high minded privilge as if it’s a universal moral code is a symbol of ignorance of the world and mankind in general. The west developed these traditions (and genes) over five thousand years. They are not universal.
Eastern europe and russia in particular are the edge of civilization, and they were centuries behind the rest of europe in their development, They do not share your utopian tolerance. They favor order and are intolerant of its absence – because they have too much experience without it. And they live in low trust societies fully corruption both private and public. In that environment you the ‘grace’ that CRP was show repeatedly, he abused repeatedly. He was no journalist. He was a propagandists agitating for an enemy while an expat alien resident in a country at war. He’s lucky they didn’t just haul him off and have him shot,
I’ve been with Azov and Praavy sektor just after they killed Russians at night. It’s a miracle Azov didn’t dispose of him. I’m aware that they considered it. So was CRP. But he had protection because he was a tacit american. And they gave him that protection over and over again but he kept abusing it.
Reply addressees: @MeMawChatterBox @TuckerCarlson
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 02:11:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745992035524288512
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745974631117258855
I don’t particularly like how it’s discussed or positioned but in less emotional terms, it is true that genes that assist in cooperation spread with greater certainity (indirect selection) than those of direct selection.
So yes.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 04:19:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745299427793703172
Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745296947806687556