Theme: Cooperation

  • (Neighborliness) I live with a community older than I am, who is often challenge

    (Neighborliness)
    I live with a community older than I am, who is often challenged with software and banking problems. So I will fix their tech issues, go to the bank with them, or help them understand when they need, and what to say to a lawyer, even if that means writing a memo…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-04 18:48:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764724699433423243

  • (Neighborliness) I live with a community older than I am, who is often challenge

    (Neighborliness)
    I live with a community older than I am, who is often challenged with software and banking problems. So I will fix their tech issues, go to the bank with them, or help them understand when they need, and what to say to a lawyer, even if that means writing a memo to the lawyer to help clarify the matter.

    I won’t let them pay me. But they can give me cookies. πŸ˜‰
    So today I stepped out of my home only to find fresh cookies on the table outside the door. πŸ˜‰

    Life’s little charming surprises. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-04 18:48:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764724699332780032

  • RT @NoahRevoy: @curtdoolittle and I talk about how to implement a boardinghouse

    RT @NoahRevoy: @curtdoolittle and I talk about how to implement a boardinghouse system to help people at risk and in need in society.

    We u…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-29 19:44:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1763289181546058051

  • THE GRADUAL CONVERGENCE OF VALUES AND THE LIMIT OF THAT CONVERGENCE You know the

    THE GRADUAL CONVERGENCE OF VALUES AND THE LIMIT OF THAT CONVERGENCE
    You know there are plenty of scholars who can answer many of the questions I do. The difference is that I have a conservative and judicial agenda of truth-before face regardless of cost. So one develops a trust in certain public intellectuals because you have an affinity for their moral bias. The reason this distribution of intellectuals is necessary is the problem of directly accessing and synthesizing the information from the sciences and history.

    If you follow my or my good friend Rudyard Lynch (@whatifalthist) you will find we have the same moral intuition, and same understanding of history, but I am concerned about governing and he is concerned about the governed. Even if we agree on everything our position will vary by this degree. So even people who agree on most everything still emphasize some set of dimensions of value vs others.

    But just as we see the physical sciences converge on a universal paradigm of universal commensurability, we also see the convergence in the behavioral sciences, and eventually morality – that if moral should and almost must, be consistent with the physical behavioral and physical sciences if we are to claim it is true.

    I do see this convergence. Though I do expect that the IQ and neotenic differences between major populations (races, ethnicities) to persist and as such the utilitarian composition of m oral rules in those polities must meet the needs of the demographic distribution within those communities.

    hugs all.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 20:16:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762210144895590400

  • Yes. First principle of cooperation

    Yes. First principle of cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-21 17:38:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1760358319934316587

    Reply addressees: @DuxHispaniii

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1760329601350242532

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: Our capacity for reciprocal insurance of individual sovereign

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: Our capacity for reciprocal insurance of individual sovereignty is limited to:

    The breadth of cooperation available bet…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-20 21:05:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1760047934341533969

  • OUR OWN JOHN VICTOR: Building Tribe: 3 Important Principles Response to our form

    OUR OWN JOHN VICTOR:
    Building Tribe: 3 Important Principles https://youtu.be/FiyXBGzSecY?si=sOgha1Vzk-05XDK9
    Response to our formation of local groups.

    Watch it. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:45:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758261354463428686

  • OUR OWN JOHN VICTOR: Building Tribe: 3 Important Principles Response to our form

    OUR OWN JOHN VICTOR:
    Building Tribe: 3 Important Principles https://t.co/B8FI6R1Cx6
    Response to our formation of local groups.

    Watch it. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:45:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758261354341756928

  • Simple Synthesis: 1) Physics (Matter) > 2) Selection (Life) > 3) Cooperation (Se

    Simple Synthesis:  1) Physics (Matter) > 2) Selection (Life) > 3) Cooperation (Sentience)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-13 01:16:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757212048260272197

  • All religions fail, and must fail, post-agrarianism unless they are reduced to l

    All religions fail, and must fail, post-agrarianism unless they are reduced to law, that is testable, decidable, and resolves differences, thus facilitating cooperation.

    Religions are simple myths that convey subjectively experiential values for use as general rules of behavior.

    In this way they contain unconscious rules (metaphysical grammars) that do not require young adult reason, or mature empiricism.

    In the hierarchy of grammars, from anthropomorphic to mythic to theological to philosophical to rationalism to empiricism to science to operationalism, we require the least cognitive and informational density at the beginning and the most cognitive effort and informational density at the end.

    Therefore as the complexity of social economic technological and political orders increase, we develop not only classes under the division of labor, but cognitive classes each using grammars of their class, in hierarchical order.

    As such, where, in primitive societies classes were marginally indifferent, in advanced societies classes are marginally different and sometimes vastly so.

    So, instead of a unifying religion of the simple and anthropomorphic experiential we require a strategy for the grop that is consistent whether described at that mythological and intuitionistic level or at the calculative and unintuitive level.

    As such the only solution is a non-false religion that can be expressed mythically to computationally.

    The only religion I know of that does this is nature worship, ancestor worship, hero worship, and ‘nation-worship’. Because all religion provokes a debt response, producing the submission response, producing the sense of safety in the group, producing mindfulness, because of shared systems of values and measurements. This is why religions function for all humans – but grammars (paradigms) of differ across humans and in particular vary by race.

    So, (a) first understand your group evolutionary strategy and why it has been successful, and (b) then attempt to translate past religions in to a new religion that is no longer false. And is, at worst, metaphysically presumptive and narrative.

    Why? Because the truth is quite challenging – we are relevant to the universe – it is a vast hostile irradiated wasteland, and even this planet seeks to genocide us with disturbing regularity – and as such must become, as our ancient pre-christian ancestors understood, competitors to the gods, so by our reason and civility eventually replace them as gods ourselves.

    Reply addressees: @X_Filosofo @AshaLogos @sovereignbrah


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-11 23:23:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756821293523931136

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756818063830196348