Theme: Cooperation

  • Turns out Jesus (if he existed) was right. In fact I’m pretty sure Dr. Werrell i

    Turns out Jesus (if he existed) was right. In fact I’m pretty sure Dr. Werrell is right, in that Jesus was the end point of the evolution of religion – he solved the hard problem of cooperation: the prisoner’s dilemma.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 03:33:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742026191115112953

    Reply addressees: @RealJonElmer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742025601333023103

  • (NLI Micro Lesson) Article I.IV: The Natural Law Section: Terms of Cooperation T

    (NLI Micro Lesson)
    Article I.IV: The Natural Law
    Section: Terms of Cooperation
    There exists only one Natural Law of Cooperation and that is Reciprocity; where reciprocity preserves sovereignty, and sovereignty preserves self determination, and self determination preserves individual and group evolutionary computation, and evolutionary computation defeats the dark forces of time, ignorance, and the risks of flora, fauna, mankind, geology, climate, sun, solar system, galactic, and universal disgregard for our condition, survival, persistence or existence.

    ANALYSIS
    The paragraph you provided presents a series of philosophical and metaphysical assertions that connect several broad concepts. Let’s break it down for clarity and examine its components:

    “There exists only one Natural Law of Cooperation and that is Reciprocity”:This statement posits that reciprocity (mutual exchange for mutual benefit) is the foundational principle or ‘natural law’ governing cooperative behavior. In various philosophical and ethical frameworks, reciprocity is indeed considered a key element in fostering cooperation among individuals and groups.

    “…where reciprocity preserves sovereignty, and sovereignty preserves self determination”:Here, the claim is made that reciprocity leads to the preservation of sovereignty (the authority of a state to govern itself or another state), and in turn, sovereignty ensures self-determination (the process by which a group of people, usually possessing a certain degree of national consciousness, form their own state and choose their own government).
    This linkage suggests a flow from interpersonal or organizational ethics (reciprocity) to political theory (sovereignty and self-determination).

    “…and self determination preserves individual and group evolutionary computation”:The term “evolutionary computation” is generally used in the context of algorithms and artificial intelligence and refers to problem-solving systems based on the principles of biological evolution.
    In this statement, it seems to metaphorically suggest that self-determination contributes to the development or progress (evolution) of individuals and groups, possibly in a cultural or societal sense.

    “…and evolutionary computation defeats the dark forces of time, ignorance, and the risks of flora, fauna, mankind, geology, climate, sun, solar system, galactic, and universal disregard for our condition, survival, persistence or existence.”:This part of the sentence appears to be a broad, metaphorical assertion that the evolutionary progress of humanity (in knowledge, culture, technology, etc.) combats various existential risks and challenges.
    These challenges are described in a sweeping range, from ecological and geological to cosmic, suggesting a philosophical view of human progress as a defense against the indifferent nature of the universe.

    Overall Interpretation:
    The paragraph is a philosophical statement linking ethical principles (reciprocity) with political concepts (sovereignty and self-determination) and extending this link to a broader metaphysical claim about human progress and survival in the face of various existential threats.
    It employs a mixture of concrete terms from social and political theory with more metaphorical language related to evolution and cosmology.
    The narrative is grand and sweeping, encompassing a wide range of ideas from different fields of thought.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:15:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741463028694941696

  • (NLI 2023 Conference Videos) Solutions for Family – Clarifying Cooperation by Lu

    (NLI 2023 Conference Videos)
    Solutions for Family – Clarifying Cooperation
    by Luke Weinhagen
    https://youtu.be/650pfxo-ebk?si=6fDSgvsonR0UB7WH


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 00:16:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741251972018094084

  • (NLI 2023 Conference Videos) Solutions for Family – Clarifying Cooperation by Lu

    (NLI 2023 Conference Videos)
    Solutions for Family – Clarifying Cooperation
    by Luke Weinhagen
    https://t.co/tlxrWte5im


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 00:16:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741251971909062657

  • Um. Let’s just say that people with shared values and lack of historical conflic

    Um. Let’s just say that people with shared values and lack of historical conflict tend to advance one another because many, many decisions are made at the fractional margins and many of those are simply decisions of personal comfort from easy of shared undersetsanding and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-23 04:10:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738411836985290878

    Reply addressees: @AmitPat09117930

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738410606032458000

  • RT @NoahRevoy: The Science of Human Cooperation. As a relationship expert I have

    RT @NoahRevoy: The Science of Human Cooperation.

    As a relationship expert I have the privilege of studying human cooperation with some of…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 09:17:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737764293578269113

  • RT @NoahRevoy: The Science of Human Cooperation. As a relationship expert I have

    RT @NoahRevoy: The Science of Human Cooperation.

    As a relationship expert I have the privilege of studying human cooperation with some of…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 04:28:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737691462802825527

  • THE FUTURE OF MORALITY REQUIES EDUCATION AND TRAINING – HUMANS OVERSIMPLIFY OTHE

    THE FUTURE OF MORALITY REQUIES EDUCATION AND TRAINING – HUMANS OVERSIMPLIFY OTHERWISE

    In the future, under NLI’s Natural Law of Cooperation, we would expect children to learn and adults to practice asking questions seeking to undersetand moral differences and decide accordingly rather than asserting opinions – and moreover opinions – as presumptive truths.

    And moral differences in what context? To yourself? Or a mate, or a family member, or a close friend, or someone in your workplace, or someone in interpersonal commerce, or someone in the general commons of society, or someone in politics, or someone who is an ally, or a potential ally, or a new introduction to an alien context, or even an anemy?

    Humans try to simplify morality as they try to simply everything so that they don’t have to think and can just react from intuition and emotion. But this is the morality of the hunter gatherer band – of proto-humans not modern humans.

    Instead, to train ourselves to not oversimplify, especially the moral, we require education and repetitive practice, so that we categorize circumstances accordingly.

    The most simple among us confuse the moral wants of their own (solipsism), or those of the family (lesser solipsism) with the moral wants and needs of contexts where each of us has less value to one another and less want and need of compromise with one another.

    So moral obligations differ with proximity of the releations between us.

    That does not mean we cannot alway start from treating all others as kin (near relations) which is the most optimistic relation possible – it’s the foundation and nearly the sole purpose of christian religion.

    However, that does not mean we should expect reciprocity in that optimistic relation, or that others share that optimism.

    Instead we should recognize that such optimism is merely a pragmatism that our civilization has discovered, and that all people in all cultures ac pragmatically according the the pragmatic mmorals of their civilizations, cultures, and classes.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-20 15:29:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737495327404376064

  • You are confusing the organizing capacity of cellular cooperation limited to tri

    You are confusing the organizing capacity of cellular cooperation limited to trial and error with the organizing capacity of sentinent cooperation that can predict alternatives and choose by rational incentives.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-18 08:49:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736669943595212804

    Reply addressees: @NewAlexandria

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736602268806308257

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: THE MOST IMPORTANT WORD IN COOPERATION: NO Learn to detect whe

    RT @ThruTheHayes: THE MOST IMPORTANT WORD IN COOPERATION: NO

    Learn to detect when you’re voluntarily complying as opposed to cooperating s…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-17 20:51:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736489318988894400