Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • @Clark_Kent @PoisonDartPepe The only possible answer yu would have is that peopl

    @Clark_Kent@PoisonDartPepe The only possible answer yu would have is that people are just imitative monkeys, or semi domesticated animals and are unable to adapt their behavior by reason given the current condition rather than being robots.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-28 13:46:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102519377862117361

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102519372344099753

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    @Clark_Kent @PoisonDartPepe You seem (oddly) to be of the opinion that despite all of human history, it is not possible for men to engage in production as well as police the commons and fight in war, as if people are widgets that cannot perform multiple functions – despite the historical record of the opposite. Markets are competitive. Politics is competitive. Policing is competitive. War is Competitive. Men can either compete and not parasitically depend upon others, or they cannot. That is evolution’s judgement.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102519372344099753

  • @Clark_Kent @PoisonDartPepe You seem (oddly) to be of the opinion that despite a

    @Clark_Kent@PoisonDartPepe You seem (oddly) to be of the opinion that despite all of human history, it is not possible for men to engage in production as well as police the commons and fight in war, as if people are widgets that cannot perform multiple functions – despite the historical record of the opposite. Markets are competitive. Politics is competitive. Policing is competitive. War is Competitive. Men can either compete and not parasitically depend upon others, or they cannot. That is evolution’s judgement.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-28 13:44:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102519372344099753

  • @baerdric We absolutely positively do not HAVE rights. We may want them. But we

    @baerdric We absolutely positively do not HAVE rights. We may want them. But we must CONSTRUCT THEM by cooperating to produce institutions that create and defend them. You can’t ‘prove’ anything close to ‘ having’ rights. YOu can only demonstrate that people desire them. and then demonstrate of those which are rights, which are rents, and which are frauds.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:46:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508292174026531

  • THE FUNDAMENTALS OF A HIGH-TRUST SOCIETY By Alain Dwight and Bill Joslin Alain D

    THE FUNDAMENTALS OF A HIGH-TRUST SOCIETY
    By Alain Dwight and Bill Joslin

    Alain Dwight:

    Quoting;

    —“It is honorable for a man to admit his fears, resistance, and edge of practice. It is simply true that each man has his limit, his capacity for growth, and his destiny. But it is dishonorable for him to lie to himself or others about his real place.

    He shouldn’t pretend he is more enlightened than he is – nor should he stop short of his actual edge. The more a man is playing his real edge, the more valuable he is as good company for other men, the more he can be trusted to be authentic and fully present.

    Where a man’s edge is located is less important than whether he is actually living his edge in truth, rather than being lazy or deluded.”—-David Deida

    Seems a bit on the “spiritual” and “emotional” side; not sure if I like the word destiny; and not sure the location of your “edge” is always less important, but the rest of this passage is solid.

    Bill Joslin:

    I think it’s bang on.

    There is nothing wrong with emotional or spiritual if it’s kept in its proper place (personal meaning) and destiny can be seen as fulfilling ones potential. (Can’t keep a good man down – can’t elevate a bad man for long).

    This, IMO, is the martial spirit. If you don’t report accurately your ability and limitations, you put your brother’s at risk.

    Reliable reporting – truthful reporting i.e. Honesty before face) – along with mitigating conflict between dangerous men, constitute the fundamental foundational requirements of a high-trust society.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:33:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508240868437456

  • CHILDHOOD’S END (Grow up. It’s just natural law.) —“[Your natural law of coope

    CHILDHOOD’S END
    (Grow up. It’s just natural law.)

    —“[Your natural law of cooperation in five rules of christianity is just another form of ] Marshmallow Christianity: lacking any real substance or value, but tastes sweet and is beloved by children. Also known as Universalist or Nondenominational.”— Some Fool Who Shall Remain Nameless

    No, it means Growing Up Into A Rational Scientific Adult that takes responsibility for himself, his polity,and the world around him for no other reason than the good for himself, his kin, his people, and mankind – DESPITE THE COST AND RISK – without false promise of false reward, stated in lies, that make him his kin and his people vulnerable to predation by abrahamism wither supernatural, or pseudoscientific, or sophistry, in the form of equality, marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, and that form of denialism we call political correctness.

    It means Grow The F*K Up and be A RESPONSIBLE adult.
    Stop pretending you’re moral when you just evade responsibility for defense of your people from superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death,

    YOU GENERATE DEMAND FOR TYRANNY, IGNORANCE, AND SUPERSTITION

    Which is just what our ancient enemies want from you.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:27:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508214693726084

  • We reciprocally grant you the right of self determination. However, we will not

    We reciprocally grant you the right of self determination. However, we will not the right of cohabitation or political cooperation. The truth is that you cannot survive without us. And ostracization is effectively your ‘end’ sentence. And all we must do is making more desirable to leave than stay.

    And that’s pretty easy.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:14:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508166024056979

  • YOU WANT A RELIGION? WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Y’all want a binding narrative. A syst

    YOU WANT A RELIGION? WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

    Y’all want a binding narrative. A system of belonging that does not require you to adapt to others, but that all others adapt to a third standard. That is the value of these systems of myth, thought, behavior, and rule.

    The west has a system and it is the militia.
    It has a binding narrative and that is our ancient enemy.

    Show up.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:13:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508160719372396

  • CHRISTIANITY: CHURCHY FAMILIES ARE BETTER. PERIOD. The problem is, churchy famil

    CHRISTIANITY: CHURCHY FAMILIES ARE BETTER. PERIOD.

    The problem is, churchy families are better. You gotta deal with the reality of it. Christianity produces mindfulness by exhaustion of forgiveness. It works by the opposite means of islam, which demands obedience and submission. So the five rules of christianity are not only consistent with natural law, they are an enhancement of it it beyond what the law itself implies. They are the via positiva of the via negativa law. But that said, how do we produce a militant, defensive and offensive, kinship-centric means of producing mindfulness, using parable or history, personal and civil ritual, that embodies those five rules – without the cancer of abrahamism that comes with them and the constant reinforcement false promise, lies, and continuously teaching the abrahamic means of lying – which christians are so desperate to practice and develop skill in.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:10:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508149914869187

  • THE PURPOSE OF RELIGIONS AND CHRISTIAN STRATEGY (from twitter) The purpose of re

    THE PURPOSE OF RELIGIONS AND CHRISTIAN STRATEGY
    (from twitter)

    The purpose of religions is to provide mindfulness (neural economy) by intergenerational transfer of group competitive strategy in non-rational terms that are resistant to attack by reason and sophism, truth and lie, science and pseudoscience, and criticism and competition.

    Christianity in 5 rules: the eradication of hatred from the human heart. The extension of familial love to all. The demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment. Faith in doing so despite the risk and cost

    Those rules create both positive and negative consequences: high trust society that can build large productive commons and low corruption institutions – at the cost of pathological altruism for the world’s least kin selected people, making them vulnerable to non-violent enemies.

    I can disambiguate every sentence you speak into your group class and gender strategy – and every other major civilization. We all perpetuate our lies in the vocabulary and grammar we know how to use, in the paradigms we inherited, to produce, free ride, or prey upon competitors.

    Find me any group that doesn’t (a) find excuses to justify it’s group competitive strategy (b) use a specific paradigm, vocabulary and grammar to communicate it in, (c) use gossip, rallying, shaming, loading, framing, obscurantism sophism and straw manning against competitors.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:50:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508070280092828

  • Democracy is sufficient for the selection of priorities given limited resources

    Democracy is sufficient for the selection of priorities given limited resources among an homogenous people with common interests. Only markets serve for a selection uncommon interests among heterogeneous people by providing means of cooperation despite disparate ends.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 02:02:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154572584853417985

    Reply addressees: @QuasLacrimas @KalishJantzen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154558701145137152

    IN REPLY TO:

    @QuasLacrimas

    A democracy is a religion that needs a common theory of collective action in addition to a common cosmology

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154558701145137152