Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • Westerners pay for the high returns on commons in exchange for every man a sheri

    Westerners pay for the high returns on commons in exchange for every man a sheriff of the commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-16 12:54:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1151112756445233153

  • Cut your whining and countersignaling. Shut up and Show up. Show the F*k up and

    Cut your whining and countersignaling. Shut up and Show up. Show the F*k up and we win.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 20:10:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150860330492469248

  • @ThePhilosopherAnonymous I can’t figure out what you’re trying to tell me. As fa

    @ThePhilosopherAnonymous

    I can’t figure out what you’re trying to tell me.

    As far as I know a marriage consists of a partnership, which in turn consists of exchanges of powers of attorney(universal), and privately negotiated terms of contract, that are insured by the polity (therefore a corporation), by reciprocal guarantee (between partners and polity) of priority in commons, non-interference, defense, and punishment of those who interfere, in exchange for insulation of the polity from the consequences of reproduction, and the externalization of costs of that reproduction, by moral hazard.

    This is my understanding of the institution of marriage and why it evolved, and why it is necessary for the continuous survival of a polity given human natural externalization of costs whenever possible (cheating, corruption, free riding, etc).

    If by ‘government interference’ you mean, interference in the intergenerational order of marriage and the commons produced therefrom, then yes the government has no such say other that to attempt to preserve it at all costs, and if not, then the peaceful dissolution of corporation (insurance), partnership (exchanges), and contract on terms agreed.

    As far as I know the 20th century interference in marriage has been for the purpose of destroying the family, and the incentives to preserve the family, so that costs are not externalized to the polity by way of moral hazard.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 00:56:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442743473869711

  • Men are super predators of the physical and political. Women are super predators

    —Men are super predators of the physical and political.
    Women are super predators of psychological and sociological.
    Together we tend to mediate the differences between the types of predation we specialize in.—

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 18:33:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150110950554570752

  • Competition between Competition and Cooperation functions as a system of computa

    Competition between Competition and Cooperation functions as a system of computation. The problem with cooperation is that natural selection disfavors intelligence and intelligence favors competition. But the only way to calculate the unknown is competition.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 13:25:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150033614769393666

    Reply addressees: @natjdyer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150008834209058817

    IN REPLY TO:

    @natjdyer

    As the article says, “Modern evolutionary science shows that cooperation is just as important in nature as competition.” This is the crux. That idea has a pedigree and a history which needs to be unearthed.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150008834209058817

  • “If you are going to show up when we need you then your opinions matter. On the

    —“If you are going to show up when we need you then your opinions matter. On the contrary….”— a Friend

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 18:12:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149743373298884608

  • WHY ARE WE DIFFERENT? We have to maintain a militia, control of territory, and t

    WHY ARE WE DIFFERENT?

    We have to maintain a militia, control of territory, and the high trust that makes possible our high returns on our production of commons. They don’t. They parasitically feed off those that do. Make sure you’re using full accounting. Gypsies can’t, They can’t, and women can’t, build a society, polity, nation, civilization. They require hosts to feed upon.
    .
    .
    .
    😉 Just how it is. Truth is enough.
    Edit

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:13:41 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426294423875746

  • Jun 29, 2019, 8:02 AM I had an insight yesterday that’s bothering me, and it’s b

    Jun 29, 2019, 8:02 AM
    I had an insight yesterday that’s bothering me, and it’s bothering me because it’s true.

    the amoral and immoral have an advantage over the moral if we let them.

    The needs for sun tzu’s, aristotle’s machiavelli’s, doolittle’s and martial epistemology, to counter the habituation of morality – while at the same time, the return on the value of the habituation of morality.

    Taleb’s (false) argument about IQ, because he’s talking about amorality and opportunism (semitism), not intelligence and capital accumulation (europeanism).

    The reason the jews have benefitted from polyethicalism (amoralism), so consistently even independent of ashkenazi distributions – vs the problem the english equivalent (“Anglicans, Tories” – the genetic superiority of the british ‘middle'[upper middle]) class at home and in the empire (opportunity diaspora).

    The value of understanding Propertarianism, which, says that we must build that moral civ by due diligence in prosecuting the immoral. The value of P in understanding that much of what appears Amoral is Immoral.

    In other words our strength is our weakness if the “commercial state” (what we have today) or the commercial sector, or the ‘religious’ sector, expand beyond national means into consumption of the accumulated capital in all its forms, including those opportunities that may not be seized amorally.

    In other words, there is an error in our demarcation between moral amoral and immoral commercial, political, religious activity.

    P fixes this implicitly but I don’t TALK about it to provide clarity explicitly.
    Edit

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:59:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426238079433292

  • I am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradicat

    I am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity:

    1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
    2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
    3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,
    4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.

    Faith in the works of jesus. Because the ultimate prisoner’s dilemma strategy – christianity – requires faith that one’s sacrifices will bear fruit in producing high trust cooperation and the outsized returns thereof.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:48:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426196355781885

  • ASK. SEEK TO UNDERSTAND. STRAW MANNING AND DISAPPROVAL AND IGNORANCE ARE NOT REC

    ASK. SEEK TO UNDERSTAND. STRAW MANNING AND DISAPPROVAL AND IGNORANCE ARE NOT RECIPROCITY NOR ARGUMENTS

    We are not equals.
    We are only compatible.
    We are only compatible under reciprocity.

    Truth before face.
    Responsibility before respect.
    Outcome before experience (feelings).

    Meet argument on equal grounds.
    Demand Question instead of Criticism.
    And Punish Laziness and Pride in Ignorance.

    I work for the OUTCOME of the peoples of the world, and there is no reason I should tolerate straw manning, critique, or pretense of argument.

    Ask, don’t tell or criticize what you don’t understand in order to defend your lack of ability, lack of knowledge, lack of work.

    Seek to understand, by asking those who understand to educate you in reciprocity, not to force those who understand to educate you in defense against your ignorance.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:41:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424751126705861