Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • I don’t work in terms of belief, but in colloquial speech,if you mean am I willi

    I don’t work in terms of belief, but in colloquial speech,if you mean am I willing to continue investing time and effort in the further cooperation under the assumption that there is a human somewhere typing rather than a machine,then yes – as I have no reason to think otherwise.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-12 19:02:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160989869843320832

    Reply addressees: @Utleyjacobite @BestyDevosEd @joffiecakes @Boneist @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160988180742627328

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160988180742627328

  • Just man up, show up, follow, fight. 😉 And we win

    Just man up, show up, follow, fight. 😉 And we win.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-12 02:27:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160739497971240962

    Reply addressees: @MrChaoticGaming

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160739002770608129

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160739002770608129

  • THE CONSERVATIVE WEAKNESS OF CONFORMITY TO SELF INTEREST RATHER THAN TO SHARED G

    THE CONSERVATIVE WEAKNESS OF CONFORMITY TO SELF INTEREST RATHER THAN TO SHARED GOALS

    As a person who succeeds at any scale, one develops the habit of judging people on their utility toward achieving ends, not on their shared frames and values, or their utility as a friend, confidant, and equal. But as an allied state with very different interests the present of which are aligned. In some sense this is the universal benefit and weakness of the right: demand for conformity when we are a host of packs, so that conformity to more than a small group is impossible. This is why the herd strategy defeats the pack strategy of the right.
    Libertarian middle and upper middle, churchy lower middle and upper working, fascist working and upper laboring. Just what you would expect in any civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:56:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576514559683383

  • THE GOAL OF FEMINISM ISN’T COOPERATIVE EXCHANGE But that isn’t the goal of femin

    THE GOAL OF FEMINISM ISN’T COOPERATIVE EXCHANGE

    But that isn’t the goal of feminism right? It’s not to achieve market competitive parity, but to exhaust all opportunities for the privilege of unearned hyperconsumption.

    Women vote to marry the state so that they can obtain the benefits of male productivity without the cost of their care. This demonstrates rational their incentives. But it merely enables hyperconsumption by women and places the burden of their irreciprocity upon men. So … ?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:55:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576510091227270

  • MINIMIZE RATHER THAN MAXIMIZE ECONOMIC ENTANGLEMENT —“I sympathize, therefore,

    MINIMIZE RATHER THAN MAXIMIZE ECONOMIC ENTANGLEMENT

    —“I sympathize, therefore, with those who would minimize, rather than with those who would maximize, economic entanglement among nations. Ideas, knowledge, science, hospitality, travel–these are the things which should of their nature be international. But let goods be homespun whenever it is reasonably and conveniently possible, and, above all, let finance be primarily national. Yet, at the same time, those who seek to disembarrass a country of its entanglements should be very slow and wary. It should not be a matter of tearing up roots but of slowly training a plant to grow in a different direction.

    For these strong reasons, therefore, I am inclined to the belief that, after the transition is accomplished, a greater measure of national self-sufficiency and economic isolation among countries than existed in 1914 may tend to serve the cause of peace, rather than otherwise. At any rate, the age of economic internationalism was not particularly successful in avoiding war; and if its friends retort, that the imperfection of its success never gave it a fair chance, it is reasonable to point out that a greater success is scarcely probable in the coming years.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:52:19 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576497596581911

  • IN PROPERTARIANISM, SOCIOLOGY = COMPATIBILISM You see, in Propertarianism, we de

    IN PROPERTARIANISM, SOCIOLOGY = COMPATIBILISM

    You see, in Propertarianism, we deal in a inequality, inequality of interests, compatibilism, and compromise, through exchange between genders and classes, rather than trying to define ideals or utopias. Why? Ideals and utopias are just scams we use to coerce others into your interests against theirs, without engaging in trade.

    We are wealthy enough for the feminine reproductive strategy of the underclasses, and the masculine strategy of the aristocratic classes, to separate, form new polities, new governments, and to return to the speciation we pursued prior to the european unification of the world in the age of sale, trade, industry, technology, science, finance, and law.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:33:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576425050609084

  • THE FUTURE ISN’T WHAT YOU THINK If men and women won’t insure each other in matu

    THE FUTURE ISN’T WHAT YOU THINK

    If men and women won’t insure each other in maturity and old age, then men will develop alternative organizations (again) to insure one another in maturity and old age – and DEVOTE THE CAPITAL TO IT that is currently consumed entirely by women.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:22:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576379796444907

  • COOPERATION BETWEEN GENDERS IS ONLY USEFUL UNTIL IT’S NOT. —“Look after oursel

    COOPERATION BETWEEN GENDERS IS ONLY USEFUL UNTIL IT’S NOT.

    —“Look after ourselves, put our needs first, do whatever we want with our time, you know, just live like a man..”—@alison__wright

    Living “like a man”, during our evolution, in prehistory, in ancient history, and right up until the european era, frequently involved treating women as another domesticated animal – property to be used in his interests. If men want to put our needs first AGAIN, it’s EASY. OK?

    You mean, you MAY as long as it’s in our interests not to revert to prior techniques, and to END the experiment in female defense under rule of law, choice of her fertility, property rights, participation in economic production, freedom of speech, and political enfranchisement.

    Never presume we are equal. The first resource is time, and the second is violence, and cooperation only comes into play when it is more rewarding over time, to cooperate rather than engage in predation. Women have rights and privileges, just like the weak do: it’s just cheaper.

    So don’t make it too ‘expensive’ to ‘tolerate’ you.

    Have we had enough dose of reality yet? Ok. Good. Now have a pat on the head and go back to playing with the garden – that men have made for you.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:22:10 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576378994210790

  • WHEN IT”S NO LONGER “US” BUT “US AND THEM” You see, once it’s no longer “Us”, it

    WHEN IT”S NO LONGER “US” BUT “US AND THEM”

    You see, once it’s no longer “Us”, it’s us and them. And once it’s no longer us, but us and them, we don’t care about them, only us. Which is where we are right now. I don’t care about them. I’m willing to revolt, separate, trade, prosper, and speciate. But no longer willing to cohabitate under the same social, economic and political order. But if separation fails, then every less pleasant option is on the table. And frankly we’d kind of rather use the other options on the table – and have our retribution thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:21:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576376916547170

  • THREE MAJOR RESPONSES – FLIGHT, FREEZE OR FIGHT. by James Dmitro Makienko —“Co

    THREE MAJOR RESPONSES – FLIGHT, FREEZE OR FIGHT.
    by James Dmitro Makienko

    —“Cooperation is only valuable until it isn’t. … Humans can choose always to (a) evade, (b) cooperate with, (c) prey upon, one another.”— CD

    Just like in danger there are three major responses – FLIGHT, FREEZE or FIGHT.

    A small minority would choose to escape the situation or circumstances

    A larger minority would try to confront it, make the most out of it for themselves

    A majority would simply go along and cooperate with each other to ensure their Maslov and status needs are met

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:10:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576331741667050