Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • MUST READ by Luke Weinhagen Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity In much the same way co

    MUST READ

    by Luke Weinhagen

    Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity

    In much the same way common biological markers are a shortcut to trust (represent a reduction in costs) common aesthetic markers as a shortcut to trust. Shared aesthetic signals “I am one of you” like shared biology does. Aesthetic, in this context, is the projection of or our kinship onto our environment and behavior.

    Consumption of the aesthetic produces an externalization of costs onto the development of common trust.

    Globalist Capitalism discounts the aesthetic.

    – It tears down the historic church to put up an Amazon distribution center.

    – It sends the work to India instead of Indiana.

    – It ignores full-accounting to limit trade to material value.

    – It denies the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic.

    – It dissolves the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports.

    Globalist Capitalism consumes our trust, and it does so at a deep discount.

    (because the aesthetic is not common between parties under globalism, aesthetic can not be valued into trade – globalist capitalism has to deny/prevent/ignore full-accounting)

    Kinship Capitalism includes the demand for full-accounting that includes the value of the aesthetic.

    – It prevents the destruction of our history and demands restitution when that history is damaged.

    – It puts the burden of extra costs on the outsider bring business into the kinship.

    – It demands the value of a resource be measured by the cost of its loss to the community as well as any material value

    – It promotes and preserves the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic.

    – Is secures the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports.

    Kinship Capitalism preserves our trust, and insures our interactions to continue to increase that trust.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 11:45:00 UTC

  • THE FUNCTION OF GODS Gods are just characters we use for kings, or pack leaders

    THE FUNCTION OF GODS

    Gods are just characters we use for kings, or pack leaders that circumvent the need for pack-leaders across families, clans, tribes, and nations, that allow us to express loyalty independent of family clan, tribe and nation. Religions are just a means of embodying rules of temporal and intergenerational behavior between families, clans, tribes, nations in ignorant, pre-literate, verbally transmitted form. False promise is a means of addicting us to following those rules despite our increase in powerlessness as the scale of our social and political orders increases – thereby alienating us. Judaism was and remains a means of constructing a mobile networked, organized crime family under the pretense of a religion. Islam is a means of constructing a universal army that conducts warfare against civilization by undermining from within and continuous raiding and attrition. Christianity was just a means of constructing a universal rebellion against civilization – but one that never managed to be able to govern because the military aristocracy and the enfranchisement of men in the military, and continuous warfare prevented it. Although were it not for the restoration of paganism via the vikings it’s not clear that we would have been able to resist islam or conduct the crusades. Christianity is just another untestifiable, unwarrantable, abrahamic false promise, to keep you ignorant and submissive and open to conquest by jews at the top and muslims at the bottom, and now, marxism, postmodernism, feminism use the same technique of false promise in the REAL world (future) instead of in the UNREAL world (after death).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 08:36:00 UTC

  • JUST SHOW UP. The way I’d put it is: 1. Showing up is more important than unders

    JUST SHOW UP.

    The way I’d put it is:

    1. Showing up is more important than understanding perfectly or being able to predict what will happen.

    2. If in doubt, show up.

    3. If we show up, we win.

    4. The more that show up, the more easily we win.

    —John Mark

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 19:59:00 UTC

  • THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF) …(James Brittingham Says:) Un

    THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF)

    …(James Brittingham Says:)
    Under the nuclear family individuals are asked to forgo the comfort, protection of large familiar networks, and… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=557469838183244&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 15:20:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218553654443225089

  • I prefer monogamy. By far. Because I prefer the deep friendship, high trust, hig

    I prefer monogamy. By far. Because I prefer the deep friendship, high trust, high investment relationship not novelty. This is a preference. It’s probably a good. But even if its a good, it’s clearly not a preference. I mean, look at the french – discreet affairs are near universal, but family remains central.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 11:11:00 UTC

  • by Tim Kay Such an important post. There are minimum necessary conditions for ci

    by Tim Kay

    Such an important post. There are minimum necessary conditions for civilisation, undermine any one of them and the castle will fall on you too. A group competitive strategy cannot be ‘wrong’ but it actually can be against one’s interests in the long term. Anyone giving a free pass to those who externalise costs onto the maintainers of those minimum necessary conditions is a laughing fool packing dynamite against the foundations of the castle they live in. It is a strategy to obtain power only – but over a ship with gaping holes in its side. And it doesn’t matter if the vector for those costs does so in ignorance or not; they are carriers of costs. And it doesn’t matter if those who cover up impositions of cost by irreciprocity do so in ignorance or not; they are carriers of lies. The only thing that matters is stopping the water from rushing in, the pillars from collapsing, the castle from falling, all that matters is the outcome and what you stand to lose. The highest moral good is stopping the rot, all others secondary, intuition insufficient.Updated Jan 18, 2020, 10:21 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 10:21:00 UTC

  • THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF) …(James Brittingham Says:) Un

    THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF)

    …(James Brittingham Says:)

    Under the nuclear family individuals are asked to forgo the comfort, protection of large familiar networks, and women face the crucible of spending all day at home alone with infants, in order to pay our surplus production into a national, civilizational or global commons.

    Sorry but this is oppression.

    Mestizoes, Hassids, bourgeois Muslims, and the Amish all live much better than “legacy Americans”, and our interlopers can hardly be blamed for noticing this.

    …(Curt Doolittle Says:)

    Nuclear families in northern europe just meant that you needed to afford a home before having children.

    So houses were nearby and communities swapped children to help each other all the time. So the entire community was an extended family.

    But your criticism is correct. Extended families, particularly

    three generation families are optimum .

    To do that we must move capital to people not people to capital.

    …(Bill Joslin Says:)

    The break in the continuity of absolute nuclear families to their extended families results from urban planners and bankers in the 1920’s which closed the door on multifamily mortgages.

    The “anglo failure” of absolute nuclear families isn’t intrinsic to the the ANF familial strategy but rather due to an extension of the strategy that inadvertently created it in the first place: i.e. usurping intergenerational transfer of wealth for those below the upper middle class.

    The Anglo reaction to the influx in Irish and Italian migrants, both of which were accustomed to multigenerational homes, urban planners and banks removed the possibility of a multigenerational home.

    Urban planners via design and zoning permits (i.e. zoning rental buildings as “single family dwellings” and banks refusing mortgages issued that had more than a single nuclear family on the application. This prevented these migrants from pooling resources and labour to make a stake and establish themselves quickly to American life. It insured the municipalities and landlords capitalized on the new population growth. every generation would pay their rent and live separately as a result.

    Similarly, the church outlawing cousin marriages, a few centuries before, pertained to land and estate grabs by the church. inheritance that would be handed to the next generation now went to the church.

    In both cases the multigenerational home was dismantled in an effort to break them apart as single economic units in order to extract more wealth from them.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 10:19:00 UTC

  • MONOGAMY by Erik Lukovsky Pagans had monogamy and rules to enforce it before Abr

    MONOGAMY

    by Erik Lukovsky

    Pagans had monogamy and rules to enforce it before Abrahamism came along

    Monotheism popularized those rules

    All people have polygamous and monogamous inclinations(genes), usually one more so than the other

    Monogamy existed(and still can exist) as a form of exchange, in which women offer sexual access and a guarantee that the males offspring is his(virginity) in exchange for the mans protection, economic resources, and attention(in some cases)

    It “ can “ be the most optimal strategy under the right conditions – there are also conditions under which other systems can work, but nevertheless, there has yet to be a successful civilization that practices polygamy(because men will revolt and kill other men if they don’t have access to women)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 08:20:00 UTC

  • AFAIK, pairing off via serial monogamy with discreet cheating that doesn’t insul

    AFAIK, pairing off via serial monogamy with discreet cheating that doesn’t insult the other party is the sort of median – but we adapt to monogamy-polygamy or serial marriage, or serial marriage with ‘cheating’ pretty easily. Religion imposed monogamy because men kill over women.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 19:20:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218251823171219457

    Reply addressees: @90_guillem

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218244900640239616

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218244900640239616

  • Dunno. Alll I know is it’s an opportunity. You don’t see antifa trying to be ‘ef

    Dunno. Alll I know is it’s an opportunity.

    You don’t see antifa trying to be ‘efficient’

    They just show up.

    Showing up is 80% of the work.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-16 17:55:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217867889023377408

    Reply addressees: @daily_normie

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217867516413927424

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217867516413927424