Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • FYI: Mandatory Conformist is a via positiva and that’s wrong. Instead, the via-n

    FYI: Mandatory Conformist is a via positiva and that’s wrong. Instead, the via-negativa term is Zero Tolerance for Defection. In other words, you can do whatever you want as long is it’s not resistance, defection, or treason against the polity.
    (We have rule of law – they don’t)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 14:49:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223981828438183936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223979547848323075

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.) And people prefer it.

    China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.
    #newright https://twitter.com/Tobeech/status/1223886335729115137

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223979547848323075

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.) And people prefer it.

    China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.
    #newright https://t.co/XXx0xcA254

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223979547848323075

  • We must use TRADE to bridge our differences. (Are you starting to see yet?) I’m

    We must use TRADE to bridge our differences.
    (Are you starting to see yet?)

    I’m using male concrete (scientific) terms.
    You’re using female seductive (deceptive) terms.

    Once you see it you can’t un-see it. The question is adaptation possible? No. Hence institutions of trade.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 13:21:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223959529425117186

    Reply addressees: @flancian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482

  • Favorite teacher tactic. Some kid misbehaves. Get the class to turn on him or he

    Favorite teacher tactic. Some kid misbehaves. Get the class to turn on him or her and say they don’t like him or her if they do that kind of thing.

    Completely against current educational protocol.

    Absolutely positively the fastest, most effective means of behavioral modification, with the most durable consequences, and with the most beneficial externalities.

    People don’t know how to teach and we get snowflakes.

    Why?

    Mothers feel guilty.

    Because they deserve to.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 11:18:00 UTC

  • NO, SERVICE ISN’T ENOUGH. —“Curt, I’m sure you’d agree, some of our most galla

    NO, SERVICE ISN’T ENOUGH.

    —“Curt, I’m sure you’d agree, some of our most gallant, extraordinary soldiers, black & brown, native American, come from the worst of ghettos, in every state, every large or small city, maybe, speaking of history, even the war fighter in the tomb of the unknown came from there?”—

    Sure. Although the majority come from intergenerational military families. And sure, you can try to spin my work as other than ‘If you can’t fit into anglo rule-of-law middle class civilization, and you vote the left in to undermine it, then your military service is irrelevant.”

    All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.

    So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.

    And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of genetic, sexual, social, economic and political market value in a world where the european civilizational windfall has been spent on dragging the world out of communism, socialism, and now islamism.

    We have the most ignorant generation in almost two centuries for a reason: by design of the left to manufacture useful idiots under the postwar false promise that their evolutionary condition was a product of oppression rather than market value to others.

    And since evidence has falsified marxism, socialism, and science has falsified feminism, postmodernism, and denial of our substantial differences in gender, class, and race, other than invasive immigration the west would have survived the 20th century of social pseudoscience.

    So we can’t let you take the rest of us down with us.

    It’s over. The century of false promise is over. You killed democracy. And it will die with your names on it for eternity.

    There will be no second fall of the Roman Empire – this time by pseudoscience instead of theology.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 21:23:00 UTC

  • CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERNCES IN SUPREMACY Its easy to be a European Supremacist on

    CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERNCES IN SUPREMACY

    Its easy to be a European Supremacist on the evidence – but european supremacy is due to thousands of years of the european group strategy of entrepreneurial warfare, heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and the commons of markets, reason, empiricism, science, medicine, technology, history, literature, and arts that results from it. But Superiority among europeans has taught us that trying to domesticate others directly doesn’t work. We can only do it by export. Our cost of conquest and rule is too high. (Even if conquest and eradication isn’t)

    Superiority among Ashkenazi hasn’t taught them much at all – hence the lack of heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and all the commons that result from it. Instead we have the Abrahamic method of false promise, baiting into hazard, justified by pilpul defended by critique and GSRRM, unwarrantied, and obfuscated by claims of plausible deniability under the claim of the victim’s volition, and the worlds most harmful lies created using that Abrahamic method of deceit: judaism, christianity, and islam in the ancient world, and marxism, cultural marxism, feminism, postmodernism, political correctness, propaganda, and financialism and denialism in the modern world.

    However, history has a long record of Chinese supremacy in no small part because of the luxury of their fertile river valleys and geographic isolation, by mountains, desert, arctic, and oceans, and relatively homogeneous genetics prohibiting the conflicts of un-isolated fertile crescent peoples. They were able to organize and create a bureaucracy early, and continuously progress – albeit much more slowly that the west. And they are demonstrating once again that national and civilizational self interest will defeat semitic religious monopoly universalism, and european market universalism.

    The future is determined by whether the anglosphere can re-unite, and the indians, chinese, are successful in reversing islamic conquest, and the europeans, north and south americans and africans prevent it.

    China is a fascist (nationalist) state and it has set the tempo for the 21st and 22nd centuries because it is the most competitive strategy a political order can adopt – and none can defeat that strategy over time.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 08:33:00 UTC

  • SHOW UP by Bill Joslin and CD What we have learned from the past thirty years. T

    SHOW UP

    by Bill Joslin and CD

    What we have learned from the past thirty years.

    Take a large number of men. Take all the resources you need to feed them. Move as fast as you can from region to region. Deplete the urban supply chain to feed the crew. Take out the power. Light some bonfires. Watch the catastrophe happen.

    The only dam holding back the ‘dependents’ is the financial system, power system, and road transport. That’s it.

    Break the dam and let the ‘water’ do its work.

    In a SHTF scenario everyone fears roaming gangs of men. So the silly folk hunker down and become victims. You cannot defend yourself from war. The only defense is offense.

    The solution is to BE the roaming gang of violent men

    intergenerational solution- become the roaming gang of violent men that win and own the peace.

    Rebels, Fighters and Soldiers…fight to win the war.

    Revolutionaries (i.e warriors) Fight to own the peace. in owning and maintaining the peace they walk the path of gods)

    So Show Up.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 12:19:00 UTC

  • TRUTH SPOKEN BY A WISE WOMAN by Sysy Carolina Muñoz If my husband has too many b

    TRUTH SPOKEN BY A WISE WOMAN

    by Sysy Carolina Muñoz

    If my husband has too many boxes open, I have learned to leave him alone and see what I can solve on my own. Usually, I can do more than I initially think and he appreciates getting to work on things without my interference/interruption. I can tell when he has plenty of boxes open because he has to ignore me for a while. I used to take it personally, now I know it’s just his multiple problem-solving mode. The sooner I leave him to it, the sooner his attention comes back. And if I absolutely need him to work on a certain box, it’s true, I just have to get his attention and to do that I have to be feminine and direct. Works every time.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:48:00 UTC

  • ANOTHER WISE WOMAN SPEAKS —“I always remind myself when speaking to men this h

    ANOTHER WISE WOMAN SPEAKS

    —“I always remind myself when speaking to men this high minded that they come from speaking about averages.”–AunMarie Grooms

    Men see the tribe as a distribution. Women see individuals and exceptions.

    This is a useful and compatible set of specializations – presuming we both know what the other is talking about and we don’t confuse the general and the particular or visa versa.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 15:21:00 UTC

  • TRUTH SPOKEN BY A WISE WOMAN by Christie Lynn Edds Cali I have learned through t

    TRUTH SPOKEN BY A WISE WOMAN

    by Christie Lynn Edds Cali

    I have learned through the years you must be very direct with a man.

    That doesn’t mean being disrespectful or rude.

    I once had it described as guys mind is like a set of boxes. They have a box open and they are working on that box. That is good, a man needs focus.

    We are like a browser with 25 tabs open, flitting from one to another. That is not a bad thing, we are wired that way so we are thinking about the gas gauge, soccer practice and dinner all at the same time.

    If we need them to pay attention to another box we have to get their attention.

    May your marriage have peace and joy.

    —

    (CD: men think in boxes. Femininity takes precedence over most boxes – other than threats. And only femininity can overcome threats.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 10:30:00 UTC

  • IT”S NOT JUST RECIPROCITY: THE METHOD When you’re testing for reciprocity ask: 1

    IT”S NOT JUST RECIPROCITY: THE METHOD

    When you’re testing for reciprocity ask:

    1 – Is it productive? Do we both have more capital under subjective value after the transfer or not?

    2 – Is it fully informed? Meaning, truthful and complete.

    3 – Is it voluntary a voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests?

    4 – Is it free of imposition of costs by externality on the demonstrated interests of others?

    5 – Is the other party warrantying that it is productive, fully informed, voluntary, and free of externality?

    6 – Is it restitutable if it is warrantied? Meaning is is possible to perform restitution, and is the other party capable of paying restitution?

    For example:

    WHEREAS;

    Party A wants to deny party B the right to bear arms.

    WHERE;

    1. Is it productive? Well no. It’s an attempt to reduce some harm at the cost of enabling another harm, but there is a difference in preference over the choice of bearing those harms.

    2. Is it fully informed? Well no. It’s an attempt to circumvent accounting for the tradeoff in risks, under the pretense that a preference is equal to a truth.

    3. Is it voluntary. Well no, it is involuntary or the question would not arise.

    4. Is it free of imposition of costs by externality on the demonstrated interests of others? Well, no, not limiting the right to bear arms imposes costs (risk) upon those who might be harmed by those with arms, and limiting it imposes costs (risk) upon those who defend self family commons and government from usurpation.

    5. Is it warrantied and warrantable. No. Neither side can warrantee the other.

    6. Is it restitutable. No life is not restitutable wither in defense of rights or in defense of self.

    7. Can an alternate solution be made? Of course. Pay the cost of protecting your interests rather than depriving others of the right to protect their interests.

    THEREFORE

    9. The alternative solution is (a)to have those people who wish to bear the risk of a disarmed public pay for their defense, or (b) for those who wish change to finance and move to a separate geography with different limits.

    This is a cursory treatment but you get the idea.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 16:41:00 UTC