Jan 28, 2020, 3:21 PM
—“I always remind myself when speaking to men this high minded that they come from speaking about averages.”–AunMarie Grooms
Men see the tribe as a distribution. Women see individuals and exceptions. This is a useful and compatible set of specializations – presuming we both know what the other is talking about and we don’t confuse the general and the particular or visa versa.
Jan 28, 2020, 3:21 PM
—“I always remind myself when speaking to men this high minded that they come from speaking about averages.”–AunMarie Grooms
Men see the tribe as a distribution. Women see individuals and exceptions. This is a useful and compatible set of specializations – presuming we both know what the other is talking about and we don’t confuse the general and the particular or visa versa.
Jan 29, 2020, 10:48 AM by Sysy Carolina Muñoz If my husband has too many boxes open, I have learned to leave him alone and see what I can solve on my own. Usually, I can do more than I initially think and he appreciates getting to work on things without my interference/interruption. I can tell when he has plenty of boxes open because he has to ignore me for a while. I used to take it personally, now I know it’s just his multiple problem-solving mode. The sooner I leave him to it, the sooner his attention comes back. And if I absolutely need him to work on a certain box, it’s true, I just have to get his attention and to do that I have to be feminine and direct. Works every time.
Jan 29, 2020, 10:48 AM by Sysy Carolina Muñoz If my husband has too many boxes open, I have learned to leave him alone and see what I can solve on my own. Usually, I can do more than I initially think and he appreciates getting to work on things without my interference/interruption. I can tell when he has plenty of boxes open because he has to ignore me for a while. I used to take it personally, now I know it’s just his multiple problem-solving mode. The sooner I leave him to it, the sooner his attention comes back. And if I absolutely need him to work on a certain box, it’s true, I just have to get his attention and to do that I have to be feminine and direct. Works every time.
There Are Enough of Us to Get the Job Done https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/there-are-enough-of-us-to-get-the-job-done/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 16:34:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264957923496734721
Jan 30, 2020, 10:29 AM
—“I’m pretty sure there are enough of us to get the job done if necessary. Certainly many of us are willing to die trying.”— Jeremy Standiford
Yes, we need to state our objectives, those objectives need to solve the problem for right and center (and even some of the left) and we must convince them that it is the only win-win solution and that all others solutions are win lose .. and we’re happy to be the winners in win-lose scenarios. And then we need to show up in sufficient numbers. 100K is more than enough. 1M and its deterministically over on day one.
Jan 30, 2020, 10:29 AM
—“I’m pretty sure there are enough of us to get the job done if necessary. Certainly many of us are willing to die trying.”— Jeremy Standiford
Yes, we need to state our objectives, those objectives need to solve the problem for right and center (and even some of the left) and we must convince them that it is the only win-win solution and that all others solutions are win lose .. and we’re happy to be the winners in win-lose scenarios. And then we need to show up in sufficient numbers. 100K is more than enough. 1M and its deterministically over on day one.
Jan 31, 2020, 7:12 AM People Just Need a Binding Narrative and Mindfulness. They do not have to come from the same sources. I just stick with (a) jesus’ teaching is reducible to five points, (b) the ten commandments are just the law of tort, ( c) and europeans don’t need to lie about either because we’ve always practiced sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, jury, tripartism, and aristocratic egalitarianism. It’s just that each of those ideas takes a standard deviation higher intelligence than the semitic religions to grasp. And that’s the net of it right there. There is no evidence people need faith. It’s a normative conclusion. People need a binding intergenerational narrative. It must have an embedded ambition. But most of the world did quite well before nonsense-religions. Ancestor worship and buddhism for the east, and ancestor worship and stoicism for the west are obvious examples. Jesus fits into the indo-european trinary religion just fine and if he had been included into the pantheon we wouldn’t have this problem – but the semites wanted to undermine the great, joyous, greco roman empire (and persian, and egyptian..) with a mandatory authoritarian universalist religion so that they could encourage (warring, lying, cheating, malicious, awful) middle eastern tribal people. But judaism succeeded by separatism, and christianity failed among tribal people, and islam evolved out of a christian sect into a conquering rather than undermining version of abrahamism.
Jan 31, 2020, 7:12 AM People Just Need a Binding Narrative and Mindfulness. They do not have to come from the same sources. I just stick with (a) jesus’ teaching is reducible to five points, (b) the ten commandments are just the law of tort, ( c) and europeans don’t need to lie about either because we’ve always practiced sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, jury, tripartism, and aristocratic egalitarianism. It’s just that each of those ideas takes a standard deviation higher intelligence than the semitic religions to grasp. And that’s the net of it right there. There is no evidence people need faith. It’s a normative conclusion. People need a binding intergenerational narrative. It must have an embedded ambition. But most of the world did quite well before nonsense-religions. Ancestor worship and buddhism for the east, and ancestor worship and stoicism for the west are obvious examples. Jesus fits into the indo-european trinary religion just fine and if he had been included into the pantheon we wouldn’t have this problem – but the semites wanted to undermine the great, joyous, greco roman empire (and persian, and egyptian..) with a mandatory authoritarian universalist religion so that they could encourage (warring, lying, cheating, malicious, awful) middle eastern tribal people. But judaism succeeded by separatism, and christianity failed among tribal people, and islam evolved out of a christian sect into a conquering rather than undermining version of abrahamism.
Jan 31, 2020, 8:33 AM Its easy to be a European Supremacist on the evidence – but european supremacy is due to thousands of years of the european group strategy of entrepreneurial warfare, heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and the commons of markets, reason, empiricism, science, medicine, technology, history, literature, and arts that results from it. But Superiority among europeans has taught us that trying to domesticate others directly doesn’t work. We can only do it by export. Our cost of conquest and rule is too high. (Even if conquest and eradication isn’t) Superiority among Ashkenazi hasn’t taught them much at all – hence the lack of heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and all the commons that result from it. Instead we have the Abrahamic method of false promise, baiting into hazard, justified by pilpul defended by critique and GSRRM, unwarrantied, and obfuscated by claims of plausible deniability under the claim of the victim’s volition, and the worlds most harmful lies created using that Abrahamic method of deceit: judaism, christianity, and islam in the ancient world, and marxism, cultural marxism, feminism, postmodernism, political correctness, propaganda, and financialism and denialism in the modern world. However, history has a long record of Chinese supremacy in no small part because of the luxury of their fertile river valleys and geographic isolation, by mountains, desert, arctic, and oceans, and relatively homogeneous genetics prohibiting the conflicts of un-isolated fertile crescent peoples. They were able to organize and create a bureaucracy early, and continuously progress – albeit much more slowly that the west. And they are demonstrating once again that national and civilizational self interest will defeat semitic religious monopoly universalism, and european market universalism. The future is determined by whether the anglosphere can re-unite, and the indians, chinese, are successful in reversing islamic conquest, and the europeans, north and south americans and africans prevent it. China is a fascist (nationalist) state and it has set the tempo for the 21st and 22nd centuries because it is the most competitive strategy a political order can adopt – and none can defeat that strategy over time.