Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • “Propertarianism Is Not an Angry Line of Thought”

    Feb 3, 2020, 10:26 AM

    —“People whom you get along with are likely to be cognitively similar and will likely also like P. Bond with like minded people. Hang out. Laugh. Introduce them to the work. Once you start a group, expand it. Propertarianism is not an angry train of thought. For those who understand can truly laugh. The lost and scared scream at the forest.”—Rick Tavi

    Interesting. I hadn’t thought of that. It’s why we have such a problem with the people who want leadership. They’re so angry. They want angry leadership. The problem is that they NEED differently from what they WANT.

  • Unite the Libertarian, Conservative, and Religious

    Unite the Libertarian, Conservative, and Religious https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/unite-the-libertarian-conservative-and-religious/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 15:03:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264572803044564993

  • The Marriage of Masculine Aristocracy and Feminine Christianity

    —“Love all the work you’ve done with John Mark. I’m just learning more about propertarianism, so far I’m pretty impressed. I hope your alliance with Christians are not just one of convenience. I think there’s a lot to be achieved with reformation Christendom that lines up nicely with the biblical model of good government.”—

    We are all western and as such we are all christian. We just practice our christianity differently. Of our ‘five religions’ christianity is the lowest in my priority and it’s the highest in others. Those religions are, in order of their evolution: Heathen Nature and Ancestors, Pagan Heroes, Aristotelian Science, Christian Deism, and Enlightenment Humanism. Masculine(Dominance) < Paganism < Heathenism < Aristotelianism <- Humanism -> Christianity > The Feminine (Submission) But the age of religious rule never came to be in the west, never could come to be, and never can come to be. The faithful required an aristocracy in Rome. They required an aristocracy in the middle ages. And they required and aristocracy in modernity. And the faith was far more corrupt than the state or burghers could ever seek to be. The faith teaches one to be a good citizen for the aristocracy. For those of us who are aristocracy first and christian second, we understand this is necessary. Christians have always been conquered and destroyed without the aristocracy. Why? Christianity is a feminine religion. The aristocracy could USE christianity to justify their aryanism. But christianity was spread by women and slaves, and even today is largely a religion of the lower classes, not the upper. So, western civilization is a marriage of masculine (dominant) aristocracy and feminine (submissive) christianity. And this is our (my) solution: to continue delivering to caesar and to Jesus as we have in the past.

  • The Marriage of Masculine Aristocracy and Feminine Christianity

    —“Love all the work you’ve done with John Mark. I’m just learning more about propertarianism, so far I’m pretty impressed. I hope your alliance with Christians are not just one of convenience. I think there’s a lot to be achieved with reformation Christendom that lines up nicely with the biblical model of good government.”—

    We are all western and as such we are all christian. We just practice our christianity differently. Of our ‘five religions’ christianity is the lowest in my priority and it’s the highest in others. Those religions are, in order of their evolution: Heathen Nature and Ancestors, Pagan Heroes, Aristotelian Science, Christian Deism, and Enlightenment Humanism. Masculine(Dominance) < Paganism < Heathenism < Aristotelianism <- Humanism -> Christianity > The Feminine (Submission) But the age of religious rule never came to be in the west, never could come to be, and never can come to be. The faithful required an aristocracy in Rome. They required an aristocracy in the middle ages. And they required and aristocracy in modernity. And the faith was far more corrupt than the state or burghers could ever seek to be. The faith teaches one to be a good citizen for the aristocracy. For those of us who are aristocracy first and christian second, we understand this is necessary. Christians have always been conquered and destroyed without the aristocracy. Why? Christianity is a feminine religion. The aristocracy could USE christianity to justify their aryanism. But christianity was spread by women and slaves, and even today is largely a religion of the lower classes, not the upper. So, western civilization is a marriage of masculine (dominant) aristocracy and feminine (submissive) christianity. And this is our (my) solution: to continue delivering to caesar and to Jesus as we have in the past.

  • So continuing our thousands of years of civilizational tradition, the aristocrac

    So continuing our thousands of years of civilizational tradition, the aristocracy of the masculine who have agency in reality, agree to use our law of reciprocity, to trade loyalty with the priesthood of the feminine who lack agency in reality, to persist our civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 13:47:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264553571904892933

    Reply addressees: @HanielAzzi @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264552835632545799

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HanielAzzi @DegenRolf And the failure of the British Experiment of an Aristocracy of Everyone, was caused in the modern world as it was in the ancient by over extension of the franchise to those peoples insufficiently genetically pacified by western values, to survive persist, and participate in them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1264552835632545799

  • Utility of Religion

    Feb 6, 2020, 6:10 PM By Bill Joslin I think religious utility is easy (He says with 20-20 hindsight after over a year of participation in king of the hill games hahahah.) Its function is to provide graceful failure.

    1. High agency/autonomy: rational/reason, consequentialism, calculation 2. Mid agency/limited autonomy: rational, emulation, virtue (qualities to emulate) 3. Low agency/highly limited autonomy : emotion(intuition-impulse), rules (deontic ethics), The church (or religions) serve to bridge the bottom two rungs whereby some religions emphasize rules (deontic) and other emphasize emulation (virtues) and have been constructed through a means of ad-hoc post-hoc collection of rules and qualities to emulate that further the particular group’s survivability. (A god(s) exists as behaviour-modifying belief that insures survivability)

  • Utility of Religion

    Feb 6, 2020, 6:10 PM By Bill Joslin I think religious utility is easy (He says with 20-20 hindsight after over a year of participation in king of the hill games hahahah.) Its function is to provide graceful failure.

    1. High agency/autonomy: rational/reason, consequentialism, calculation 2. Mid agency/limited autonomy: rational, emulation, virtue (qualities to emulate) 3. Low agency/highly limited autonomy : emotion(intuition-impulse), rules (deontic ethics), The church (or religions) serve to bridge the bottom two rungs whereby some religions emphasize rules (deontic) and other emphasize emulation (virtues) and have been constructed through a means of ad-hoc post-hoc collection of rules and qualities to emulate that further the particular group’s survivability. (A god(s) exists as behaviour-modifying belief that insures survivability)

  • Diversity Means Division

    Feb 7, 2020, 9:15 AM

    —“Diversity is synonym for Division and Division’s not a strength it’s a weakness. Strength arises from Unity not Division. Diversity between nations is a strength for humanity, but Division within Nations is a weakness.”–Bic Verger —“Diversity isn’t necessarily synonymous with division, it is however necessarily antonymous to equality.”—Martin Štěpán

    Equality is made possible by appealing to ending status and power competition using kin selection. Devolve the federal government once again and restore the constitution to an alliance of nation-states. Europe solved this problem and only napoleon undermined it. A large number of small homogenous nation states produces a market for different commons producing polities and the greatest tolerance for reciprocity and proportionality

  • Diversity Means Division

    Feb 7, 2020, 9:15 AM

    —“Diversity is synonym for Division and Division’s not a strength it’s a weakness. Strength arises from Unity not Division. Diversity between nations is a strength for humanity, but Division within Nations is a weakness.”–Bic Verger —“Diversity isn’t necessarily synonymous with division, it is however necessarily antonymous to equality.”—Martin Štěpán

    Equality is made possible by appealing to ending status and power competition using kin selection. Devolve the federal government once again and restore the constitution to an alliance of nation-states. Europe solved this problem and only napoleon undermined it. A large number of small homogenous nation states produces a market for different commons producing polities and the greatest tolerance for reciprocity and proportionality

  • Women’s Movement for Natural Law

    Feb 7, 2020, 9:49 AM

    —I think it’s better for women to create solidarity with women on ending the program of undermining that women were baited into with the false promise of equality rather than the promise of improving our compatibility under change in the division of labor made possible by the industrial and technological and informational revolutions. I think if you ask women to join to help build this ‘movement’ of getting past GSRRM and ending undermining, thereby restoring compatibility, cooperation, in a division of perceptual, cognitive, and physical labor that this will be a mission women will be attracted to, because it will make women better women with regard to OTHER WOMEN as well as with regard to mates children – and even other men. Men had to learn not to physically retaliate. Law is a vehicle for ending retaliation cycles (feuds). Women have not had the political, economic, or social opportunity to develop female traditions, so that women learn not to SOCIALLY and PSYCHOLOGICALLY retaliate and end women’s retaliation cycles (feuds).—

    We aren’t equal. Genders, Maturity, Generations, Classes, Ethnicities, Nations, Civilizations, or Races. Under natural law of reciprocity and division of labor we are compatible despite all those inequalities. End retaliation cycles by sticking to reciprocity.